Cargando…
Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm
BACKGROUND: A peripheral nerve stimulus can enhance or suppress the evoked response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depending on the latency of the preceding peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) pulse. Similarly, somatosensory afference from the passively moving limb can transiently alter c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-31 |
_version_ | 1782310196230488064 |
---|---|
author | Edwards, Dylan J Dipietro, Laura Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli Medeiros, Ana H Thickbroom, Gary W Mastaglia, Francis L Krebs, Hermano I Pascual-Leone, Alvaro |
author_facet | Edwards, Dylan J Dipietro, Laura Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli Medeiros, Ana H Thickbroom, Gary W Mastaglia, Francis L Krebs, Hermano I Pascual-Leone, Alvaro |
author_sort | Edwards, Dylan J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A peripheral nerve stimulus can enhance or suppress the evoked response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depending on the latency of the preceding peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) pulse. Similarly, somatosensory afference from the passively moving limb can transiently alter corticomotor excitability, in a phase-dependent manner. The repeated association of PNS with TMS is known to modulate corticomotor excitability; however, it is unknown whether repeated passive-movement associative stimulation (MAS) has similar effects. METHODS: In a proof-of-principle study, using a cross-over design, seven healthy subjects received in separate sessions: (1) TMS (120% of the resting motor threshold-RMT, optimal site for Flexor Carpi Radialis) with muscle at rest; (2) TMS paired with cyclic passive movement during extension cyclic passive movement (400 pairs, 1 Hz), with the intervention order randomly assigned. Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, then compared to pre-intervention baseline using repeated measures ANOVA with a Dunnet multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: MAS led to a progressive and significant decrease in the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude over the intervention (R(2) = 0.6665, P < 0.0001), which was not evident with TMS alone (R(2) = 0.0068, P = 0.641). Post-intervention excitability reduction, only present with MAS intervention, remained for 20min (0-10min = 68.2 ± 4.9%, P < 0.05; 10-20min = 73.3 ± 9.7%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The association of somatosensory afference from the moving limb with TMS over primary motor cortex in healthy subjects can be used to modulate corticomotor excitability, and may have therapeutic implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3975847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39758472014-04-05 Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm Edwards, Dylan J Dipietro, Laura Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli Medeiros, Ana H Thickbroom, Gary W Mastaglia, Francis L Krebs, Hermano I Pascual-Leone, Alvaro J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: A peripheral nerve stimulus can enhance or suppress the evoked response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depending on the latency of the preceding peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) pulse. Similarly, somatosensory afference from the passively moving limb can transiently alter corticomotor excitability, in a phase-dependent manner. The repeated association of PNS with TMS is known to modulate corticomotor excitability; however, it is unknown whether repeated passive-movement associative stimulation (MAS) has similar effects. METHODS: In a proof-of-principle study, using a cross-over design, seven healthy subjects received in separate sessions: (1) TMS (120% of the resting motor threshold-RMT, optimal site for Flexor Carpi Radialis) with muscle at rest; (2) TMS paired with cyclic passive movement during extension cyclic passive movement (400 pairs, 1 Hz), with the intervention order randomly assigned. Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, then compared to pre-intervention baseline using repeated measures ANOVA with a Dunnet multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: MAS led to a progressive and significant decrease in the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude over the intervention (R(2) = 0.6665, P < 0.0001), which was not evident with TMS alone (R(2) = 0.0068, P = 0.641). Post-intervention excitability reduction, only present with MAS intervention, remained for 20min (0-10min = 68.2 ± 4.9%, P < 0.05; 10-20min = 73.3 ± 9.7%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The association of somatosensory afference from the moving limb with TMS over primary motor cortex in healthy subjects can be used to modulate corticomotor excitability, and may have therapeutic implications. BioMed Central 2014-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3975847/ /pubmed/24597619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-31 Text en Copyright © 2014 Edwards et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Edwards, Dylan J Dipietro, Laura Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli Medeiros, Ana H Thickbroom, Gary W Mastaglia, Francis L Krebs, Hermano I Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm |
title | Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm |
title_full | Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm |
title_fullStr | Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed | Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm |
title_short | Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm |
title_sort | movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardsdylanj movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm AT dipietrolaura movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm AT demirtastatlidedeasli movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm AT medeirosanah movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm AT thickbroomgaryw movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm AT mastagliafrancisl movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm AT krebshermanoi movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm AT pascualleonealvaro movementgeneratedafferencepairedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulationanassociativestimulationparadigm |