Cargando…

A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of childbirth delivery method on vaginal pressure and abdominal thickness during the Valsalva maneuver (VAL). [Subjects] Thirty healthy female volunteers (26–39 years of age) were selected for this research. Their delivery histories were:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Haroo, Kak, Hwang-Bo, Kim, Boin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24707104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.443
_version_ 1782310229673771008
author Kim, Haroo
Kak, Hwang-Bo
Kim, Boin
author_facet Kim, Haroo
Kak, Hwang-Bo
Kim, Boin
author_sort Kim, Haroo
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of childbirth delivery method on vaginal pressure and abdominal thickness during the Valsalva maneuver (VAL). [Subjects] Thirty healthy female volunteers (26–39 years of age) were selected for this research. Their delivery histories were: nulliparous 10, vaginal delivery 10, and Cesarean delivery 10. None of the participants had a history of incontinence. [Methods] In the crook-lying position, a perineometer probe was inserted into the vagina and the transducer was placed transversely on the right side of the body during the Valsalva maneuver. [Results] There were significant differences in the thickness of the transverses abdominis (TrA) between in all the groups rest and the Valsalva maneuver, and there were significant differences in the internus oblique (IO) in the nulliparous group. During the Valsalva maneuver, there were significant differences in the TrA between the nulliparous group and the vaginal delivery group, and there were significant differences in the IO between the nulliparous delivery group and the vaginal delivery group, and between the nulliparous group and the Cesarean section group. Delivery history changed vaginal pressure, and there were significant differences between the nulliparous group and the vaginal delivery group, and between the nulliparous group and the Cesarean delivery group. [Conclusion] Pregnancy and delivery method may affect pelvic floor and abdominal muscles during the Valsalva maneuver.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3976023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39760232014-04-04 A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver Kim, Haroo Kak, Hwang-Bo Kim, Boin J Phys Ther Sci Original [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of childbirth delivery method on vaginal pressure and abdominal thickness during the Valsalva maneuver (VAL). [Subjects] Thirty healthy female volunteers (26–39 years of age) were selected for this research. Their delivery histories were: nulliparous 10, vaginal delivery 10, and Cesarean delivery 10. None of the participants had a history of incontinence. [Methods] In the crook-lying position, a perineometer probe was inserted into the vagina and the transducer was placed transversely on the right side of the body during the Valsalva maneuver. [Results] There were significant differences in the thickness of the transverses abdominis (TrA) between in all the groups rest and the Valsalva maneuver, and there were significant differences in the internus oblique (IO) in the nulliparous group. During the Valsalva maneuver, there were significant differences in the TrA between the nulliparous group and the vaginal delivery group, and there were significant differences in the IO between the nulliparous delivery group and the vaginal delivery group, and between the nulliparous group and the Cesarean section group. Delivery history changed vaginal pressure, and there were significant differences between the nulliparous group and the vaginal delivery group, and between the nulliparous group and the Cesarean delivery group. [Conclusion] Pregnancy and delivery method may affect pelvic floor and abdominal muscles during the Valsalva maneuver. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014-03-25 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3976023/ /pubmed/24707104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.443 Text en 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original
Kim, Haroo
Kak, Hwang-Bo
Kim, Boin
A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver
title A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver
title_full A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver
title_fullStr A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver
title_short A Comparison of Vaginal Pressures and Abdominal Muscle Thickness According to Childbirth Delivery Method during the Valsalva Maneuver
title_sort comparison of vaginal pressures and abdominal muscle thickness according to childbirth delivery method during the valsalva maneuver
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24707104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.443
work_keys_str_mv AT kimharoo acomparisonofvaginalpressuresandabdominalmusclethicknessaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodduringthevalsalvamaneuver
AT kakhwangbo acomparisonofvaginalpressuresandabdominalmusclethicknessaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodduringthevalsalvamaneuver
AT kimboin acomparisonofvaginalpressuresandabdominalmusclethicknessaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodduringthevalsalvamaneuver
AT kimharoo comparisonofvaginalpressuresandabdominalmusclethicknessaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodduringthevalsalvamaneuver
AT kakhwangbo comparisonofvaginalpressuresandabdominalmusclethicknessaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodduringthevalsalvamaneuver
AT kimboin comparisonofvaginalpressuresandabdominalmusclethicknessaccordingtochildbirthdeliverymethodduringthevalsalvamaneuver