Cargando…
Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications are one of the most common treatments for mood disorders. In humans, these medications are taken orally, usually once per day. Unfortunately, administration of antidepressant medications in rodent models is often through injection, oral gavage, or m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/123026 |
_version_ | 1782310352932831232 |
---|---|
author | Pawluski, Jodi L. van Donkelaar, Eva Abrams, Zipporah Houbart, Virginie Fillet, Marianne Steinbusch, Harry W. M. Charlier, Thierry D. |
author_facet | Pawluski, Jodi L. van Donkelaar, Eva Abrams, Zipporah Houbart, Virginie Fillet, Marianne Steinbusch, Harry W. M. Charlier, Thierry D. |
author_sort | Pawluski, Jodi L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications are one of the most common treatments for mood disorders. In humans, these medications are taken orally, usually once per day. Unfortunately, administration of antidepressant medications in rodent models is often through injection, oral gavage, or minipump implant, all relatively stressful procedures. The aim of the present study was to investigate how administration of the commonly used SSRI, fluoxetine, via a wafer cookie, compares to fluoxetine administration using an osmotic minipump, with regards to serum drug levels and hippocampal plasticity. For this experiment, adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided over the two administration methods: (1) cookie and (2) osmotic minipump and three fluoxetine treatment doses: 0, 5, or 10 mg/kg/day. Results show that a fluoxetine dose of 5 mg/kg/day, but not 10 mg/kg/day, results in comparable serum levels of fluoxetine and its active metabolite norfluoxetine between the two administration methods. Furthermore, minipump administration of fluoxetine resulted in higher levels of cell proliferation in the granule cell layer (GCL) at a 5 mg dose compared to a 10 mg dose. Synaptophysin expression in the GCL, but not CA3, was significantly lower after fluoxetine treatment, regardless of administration method. These data suggest that the administration method and dose of fluoxetine can differentially affect hippocampal plasticity in the adult female rat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3976918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39769182014-04-22 Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats Pawluski, Jodi L. van Donkelaar, Eva Abrams, Zipporah Houbart, Virginie Fillet, Marianne Steinbusch, Harry W. M. Charlier, Thierry D. Neural Plast Research Article Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications are one of the most common treatments for mood disorders. In humans, these medications are taken orally, usually once per day. Unfortunately, administration of antidepressant medications in rodent models is often through injection, oral gavage, or minipump implant, all relatively stressful procedures. The aim of the present study was to investigate how administration of the commonly used SSRI, fluoxetine, via a wafer cookie, compares to fluoxetine administration using an osmotic minipump, with regards to serum drug levels and hippocampal plasticity. For this experiment, adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided over the two administration methods: (1) cookie and (2) osmotic minipump and three fluoxetine treatment doses: 0, 5, or 10 mg/kg/day. Results show that a fluoxetine dose of 5 mg/kg/day, but not 10 mg/kg/day, results in comparable serum levels of fluoxetine and its active metabolite norfluoxetine between the two administration methods. Furthermore, minipump administration of fluoxetine resulted in higher levels of cell proliferation in the granule cell layer (GCL) at a 5 mg dose compared to a 10 mg dose. Synaptophysin expression in the GCL, but not CA3, was significantly lower after fluoxetine treatment, regardless of administration method. These data suggest that the administration method and dose of fluoxetine can differentially affect hippocampal plasticity in the adult female rat. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3976918/ /pubmed/24757568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/123026 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jodi L. Pawluski et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pawluski, Jodi L. van Donkelaar, Eva Abrams, Zipporah Houbart, Virginie Fillet, Marianne Steinbusch, Harry W. M. Charlier, Thierry D. Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats |
title | Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats |
title_full | Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats |
title_fullStr | Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats |
title_short | Fluoxetine Dose and Administration Method Differentially Affect Hippocampal Plasticity in Adult Female Rats |
title_sort | fluoxetine dose and administration method differentially affect hippocampal plasticity in adult female rats |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/123026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pawluskijodil fluoxetinedoseandadministrationmethoddifferentiallyaffecthippocampalplasticityinadultfemalerats AT vandonkelaareva fluoxetinedoseandadministrationmethoddifferentiallyaffecthippocampalplasticityinadultfemalerats AT abramszipporah fluoxetinedoseandadministrationmethoddifferentiallyaffecthippocampalplasticityinadultfemalerats AT houbartvirginie fluoxetinedoseandadministrationmethoddifferentiallyaffecthippocampalplasticityinadultfemalerats AT filletmarianne fluoxetinedoseandadministrationmethoddifferentiallyaffecthippocampalplasticityinadultfemalerats AT steinbuschharrywm fluoxetinedoseandadministrationmethoddifferentiallyaffecthippocampalplasticityinadultfemalerats AT charlierthierryd fluoxetinedoseandadministrationmethoddifferentiallyaffecthippocampalplasticityinadultfemalerats |