Cargando…

Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures

Statement of Problem: For a luting agent to allow complete seating of prosthetic restorations, it must obtain an appropriate flow rate maintaining a minimum film thickness. The performance of recently introduced luting agents in this regard has not been evaluated. Purpose: To measure and compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bagheri, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3977547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724120
_version_ 1782310438632947712
author Bagheri, R
author_facet Bagheri, R
author_sort Bagheri, R
collection PubMed
description Statement of Problem: For a luting agent to allow complete seating of prosthetic restorations, it must obtain an appropriate flow rate maintaining a minimum film thickness. The performance of recently introduced luting agents in this regard has not been evaluated. Purpose: To measure and compare the film thickness and flow properties of seven resin-containing luting cements at different temperatures (37°C, 25°C and10°C). Material and Methods: Specimens were prepared from five resin luting cements; seT (SDI), Panavia F (Kuraray), Varioloink II (Ivoclar), Maxcem (Kerr), Nexus2 (Kerr) and two resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (RM-GICs); GC Fuji Plus (GC Corporation), and RelyX Luting 2 (3 M/ESPE). The film thickness and flow rate of each cement (n=15) was determined using the test described in ISO at three different temperatures. Results: There was a linear correlation between film thickness and flow rate for most of the materials. Cooling increased fluidity of almost all materials while the effect of temperature on film thickness was material dependent. At 37°C, all products revealed a film thickness of less than 25µm except for GC Fuji Plus. At 25°C, all cements produced a film thickness of less than 27 µm except for seT. At 10°C, apart from seT and Rely X Luting 2, the remaining cements showed a film thickness smaller than 20 µm. Conclusion: Cooling increased fluidity of almost all materials, however. the film thickness did not exceed 35 µm in either condition, in spite of the lowest film thickness being demonstrated at the lowest temperature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3977547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39775472014-04-10 Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures Bagheri, R J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article Statement of Problem: For a luting agent to allow complete seating of prosthetic restorations, it must obtain an appropriate flow rate maintaining a minimum film thickness. The performance of recently introduced luting agents in this regard has not been evaluated. Purpose: To measure and compare the film thickness and flow properties of seven resin-containing luting cements at different temperatures (37°C, 25°C and10°C). Material and Methods: Specimens were prepared from five resin luting cements; seT (SDI), Panavia F (Kuraray), Varioloink II (Ivoclar), Maxcem (Kerr), Nexus2 (Kerr) and two resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (RM-GICs); GC Fuji Plus (GC Corporation), and RelyX Luting 2 (3 M/ESPE). The film thickness and flow rate of each cement (n=15) was determined using the test described in ISO at three different temperatures. Results: There was a linear correlation between film thickness and flow rate for most of the materials. Cooling increased fluidity of almost all materials while the effect of temperature on film thickness was material dependent. At 37°C, all products revealed a film thickness of less than 25µm except for GC Fuji Plus. At 25°C, all cements produced a film thickness of less than 27 µm except for seT. At 10°C, apart from seT and Rely X Luting 2, the remaining cements showed a film thickness smaller than 20 µm. Conclusion: Cooling increased fluidity of almost all materials, however. the film thickness did not exceed 35 µm in either condition, in spite of the lowest film thickness being demonstrated at the lowest temperature. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3977547/ /pubmed/24724120 Text en © 2013: Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bagheri, R
Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures
title Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures
title_full Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures
title_fullStr Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures
title_full_unstemmed Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures
title_short Film Thickness and Flow Properties of Resin-Based Cements at Different Temperatures
title_sort film thickness and flow properties of resin-based cements at different temperatures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3977547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724120
work_keys_str_mv AT bagherir filmthicknessandflowpropertiesofresinbasedcementsatdifferenttemperatures