Cargando…
Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks
Perception is an active inferential process in which prior knowledge is combined with sensory input, the result of which determines the contents of awareness. Accordingly, previous experience is known to help the brain “decide” what to perceive. However, a critical aspect that has not been addressed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3977616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs396 |
_version_ | 1782310448553525248 |
---|---|
author | Schwiedrzik, Caspar M. Ruff, Christian C. Lazar, Andreea Leitner, Frauke C. Singer, Wolf Melloni, Lucia |
author_facet | Schwiedrzik, Caspar M. Ruff, Christian C. Lazar, Andreea Leitner, Frauke C. Singer, Wolf Melloni, Lucia |
author_sort | Schwiedrzik, Caspar M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Perception is an active inferential process in which prior knowledge is combined with sensory input, the result of which determines the contents of awareness. Accordingly, previous experience is known to help the brain “decide” what to perceive. However, a critical aspect that has not been addressed is that previous experience can exert 2 opposing effects on perception: An attractive effect, sensitizing the brain to perceive the same again (hysteresis), or a repulsive effect, making it more likely to perceive something else (adaptation). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and modeling to elucidate how the brain entertains these 2 opposing processes, and what determines the direction of such experience-dependent perceptual effects. We found that although affecting our perception concurrently, hysteresis and adaptation map into distinct cortical networks: a widespread network of higher-order visual and fronto-parietal areas was involved in perceptual stabilization, while adaptation was confined to early visual areas. This areal and hierarchical segregation may explain how the brain maintains the balance between exploiting redundancies and staying sensitive to new information. We provide a Bayesian model that accounts for the coexistence of hysteresis and adaptation by separating their causes into 2 distinct terms: Hysteresis alters the prior, whereas adaptation changes the sensory evidence (the likelihood function). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3977616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39776162014-04-07 Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks Schwiedrzik, Caspar M. Ruff, Christian C. Lazar, Andreea Leitner, Frauke C. Singer, Wolf Melloni, Lucia Cereb Cortex Articles Perception is an active inferential process in which prior knowledge is combined with sensory input, the result of which determines the contents of awareness. Accordingly, previous experience is known to help the brain “decide” what to perceive. However, a critical aspect that has not been addressed is that previous experience can exert 2 opposing effects on perception: An attractive effect, sensitizing the brain to perceive the same again (hysteresis), or a repulsive effect, making it more likely to perceive something else (adaptation). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and modeling to elucidate how the brain entertains these 2 opposing processes, and what determines the direction of such experience-dependent perceptual effects. We found that although affecting our perception concurrently, hysteresis and adaptation map into distinct cortical networks: a widespread network of higher-order visual and fronto-parietal areas was involved in perceptual stabilization, while adaptation was confined to early visual areas. This areal and hierarchical segregation may explain how the brain maintains the balance between exploiting redundancies and staying sensitive to new information. We provide a Bayesian model that accounts for the coexistence of hysteresis and adaptation by separating their causes into 2 distinct terms: Hysteresis alters the prior, whereas adaptation changes the sensory evidence (the likelihood function). Oxford University Press 2014-05 2012-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3977616/ /pubmed/23236204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs396 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Articles Schwiedrzik, Caspar M. Ruff, Christian C. Lazar, Andreea Leitner, Frauke C. Singer, Wolf Melloni, Lucia Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks |
title | Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks |
title_full | Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks |
title_fullStr | Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks |
title_short | Untangling Perceptual Memory: Hysteresis and Adaptation Map into Separate Cortical Networks |
title_sort | untangling perceptual memory: hysteresis and adaptation map into separate cortical networks |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3977616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwiedrzikcasparm untanglingperceptualmemoryhysteresisandadaptationmapintoseparatecorticalnetworks AT ruffchristianc untanglingperceptualmemoryhysteresisandadaptationmapintoseparatecorticalnetworks AT lazarandreea untanglingperceptualmemoryhysteresisandadaptationmapintoseparatecorticalnetworks AT leitnerfraukec untanglingperceptualmemoryhysteresisandadaptationmapintoseparatecorticalnetworks AT singerwolf untanglingperceptualmemoryhysteresisandadaptationmapintoseparatecorticalnetworks AT mellonilucia untanglingperceptualmemoryhysteresisandadaptationmapintoseparatecorticalnetworks |