Cargando…
Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example
BACKGROUND: Identifying and characterizing how mixtures of exposures are associated with health endpoints is challenging. We demonstrate how classification and regression trees can be used to generate hypotheses regarding joint effects from exposure mixtures. METHODS: We illustrate the approach by i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3977944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24625053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-17 |
_version_ | 1782310482433015808 |
---|---|
author | Gass, Katherine Klein, Mitch Chang, Howard H Flanders, W Dana Strickland, Matthew J |
author_facet | Gass, Katherine Klein, Mitch Chang, Howard H Flanders, W Dana Strickland, Matthew J |
author_sort | Gass, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Identifying and characterizing how mixtures of exposures are associated with health endpoints is challenging. We demonstrate how classification and regression trees can be used to generate hypotheses regarding joint effects from exposure mixtures. METHODS: We illustrate the approach by investigating the joint effects of CO, NO2, O3, and PM2.5 on emergency department visits for pediatric asthma in Atlanta, Georgia. Pollutant concentrations were categorized as quartiles. Days when all pollutants were in the lowest quartile were held out as the referent group (n = 131) and the remaining 3,879 days were used to estimate the regression tree. Pollutants were parameterized as dichotomous variables representing each ordinal split of the quartiles (e.g. comparing CO quartile 1 vs. CO quartiles 2–4) and considered one at a time in a Poisson case-crossover model with control for confounding. The pollutant-split resulting in the smallest P-value was selected as the first split and the dataset was partitioned accordingly. This process repeated for each subset of the data until the P-values for the remaining splits were not below a given alpha, resulting in the formation of a “terminal node”. We used the case-crossover model to estimate the adjusted risk ratio for each terminal node compared to the referent group, as well as the likelihood ratio test for the inclusion of the terminal nodes in the final model. RESULTS: The largest risk ratio corresponded to days when PM2.5 was in the highest quartile and NO2 was in the lowest two quartiles (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.16). A simultaneous Wald test for the inclusion of all terminal nodes in the model was significant, with a chi-square statistic of 34.3 (p = 0.001, with 13 degrees of freedom). CONCLUSIONS: Regression trees can be used to hypothesize about joint effects of exposure mixtures and may be particularly useful in the field of air pollution epidemiology for gaining a better understanding of complex multipollutant exposures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3977944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39779442014-04-08 Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example Gass, Katherine Klein, Mitch Chang, Howard H Flanders, W Dana Strickland, Matthew J Environ Health Methodology BACKGROUND: Identifying and characterizing how mixtures of exposures are associated with health endpoints is challenging. We demonstrate how classification and regression trees can be used to generate hypotheses regarding joint effects from exposure mixtures. METHODS: We illustrate the approach by investigating the joint effects of CO, NO2, O3, and PM2.5 on emergency department visits for pediatric asthma in Atlanta, Georgia. Pollutant concentrations were categorized as quartiles. Days when all pollutants were in the lowest quartile were held out as the referent group (n = 131) and the remaining 3,879 days were used to estimate the regression tree. Pollutants were parameterized as dichotomous variables representing each ordinal split of the quartiles (e.g. comparing CO quartile 1 vs. CO quartiles 2–4) and considered one at a time in a Poisson case-crossover model with control for confounding. The pollutant-split resulting in the smallest P-value was selected as the first split and the dataset was partitioned accordingly. This process repeated for each subset of the data until the P-values for the remaining splits were not below a given alpha, resulting in the formation of a “terminal node”. We used the case-crossover model to estimate the adjusted risk ratio for each terminal node compared to the referent group, as well as the likelihood ratio test for the inclusion of the terminal nodes in the final model. RESULTS: The largest risk ratio corresponded to days when PM2.5 was in the highest quartile and NO2 was in the lowest two quartiles (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.16). A simultaneous Wald test for the inclusion of all terminal nodes in the model was significant, with a chi-square statistic of 34.3 (p = 0.001, with 13 degrees of freedom). CONCLUSIONS: Regression trees can be used to hypothesize about joint effects of exposure mixtures and may be particularly useful in the field of air pollution epidemiology for gaining a better understanding of complex multipollutant exposures. BioMed Central 2014-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3977944/ /pubmed/24625053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gass et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Gass, Katherine Klein, Mitch Chang, Howard H Flanders, W Dana Strickland, Matthew J Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example |
title | Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example |
title_full | Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example |
title_fullStr | Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example |
title_short | Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example |
title_sort | classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research: an air pollution example |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3977944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24625053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gasskatherine classificationandregressiontreesforepidemiologicresearchanairpollutionexample AT kleinmitch classificationandregressiontreesforepidemiologicresearchanairpollutionexample AT changhowardh classificationandregressiontreesforepidemiologicresearchanairpollutionexample AT flanderswdana classificationandregressiontreesforepidemiologicresearchanairpollutionexample AT stricklandmatthewj classificationandregressiontreesforepidemiologicresearchanairpollutionexample |