Cargando…

Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not

Green-tree retention is a forest management method in which some living trees are left on a logged area. The aim is to offer ‘lifeboats’ to support species immediately after logging and to provide microhabitats during and after forest re-establishment. Several studies have shown immediate decline in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oldén, Anna, Ovaskainen, Otso, Kotiaho, Janne S., Laaka-Lindberg, Sanna, Halme, Panu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093786
_version_ 1782310507749834752
author Oldén, Anna
Ovaskainen, Otso
Kotiaho, Janne S.
Laaka-Lindberg, Sanna
Halme, Panu
author_facet Oldén, Anna
Ovaskainen, Otso
Kotiaho, Janne S.
Laaka-Lindberg, Sanna
Halme, Panu
author_sort Oldén, Anna
collection PubMed
description Green-tree retention is a forest management method in which some living trees are left on a logged area. The aim is to offer ‘lifeboats’ to support species immediately after logging and to provide microhabitats during and after forest re-establishment. Several studies have shown immediate decline in bryophyte diversity after retention logging and thus questioned the effectiveness of this method, but longer term studies are lacking. Here we studied the epiphytic bryophytes on European aspen (Populus tremula L.) retention trees along a 30-year chronosequence. We compared the bryophyte flora of 102 ‘retention aspens’ on 14 differently aged retention sites with 102 ‘conservation aspens’ on 14 differently aged conservation sites. We used a Bayesian community-level modelling approach to estimate the changes in bryophyte species richness, abundance (area covered) and community structure during 30 years after logging. Using the fitted model, we estimated that two years after logging both species richness and abundance of bryophytes declined, but during the following 20–30 years both recovered to the level of conservation aspens. However, logging-induced changes in bryophyte community structure did not fully recover over the same time period. Liverwort species showed some or low potential to benefit from lifeboating and high potential to re-colonise as time since logging increases. Most moss species responded similarly, but two cushion-forming mosses benefited from the logging disturbance while several weft- or mat-forming mosses declined and did not re-colonise in 20–30 years. We conclude that retention trees do not function as equally effective lifeboats for all bryophyte species but are successful in providing suitable habitats for many species in the long-term. To be most effective, retention cuts should be located adjacent to conservation sites, which may function as sources of re-colonisation and support the populations of species that require old-growth forests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3978069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39780692014-04-11 Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not Oldén, Anna Ovaskainen, Otso Kotiaho, Janne S. Laaka-Lindberg, Sanna Halme, Panu PLoS One Research Article Green-tree retention is a forest management method in which some living trees are left on a logged area. The aim is to offer ‘lifeboats’ to support species immediately after logging and to provide microhabitats during and after forest re-establishment. Several studies have shown immediate decline in bryophyte diversity after retention logging and thus questioned the effectiveness of this method, but longer term studies are lacking. Here we studied the epiphytic bryophytes on European aspen (Populus tremula L.) retention trees along a 30-year chronosequence. We compared the bryophyte flora of 102 ‘retention aspens’ on 14 differently aged retention sites with 102 ‘conservation aspens’ on 14 differently aged conservation sites. We used a Bayesian community-level modelling approach to estimate the changes in bryophyte species richness, abundance (area covered) and community structure during 30 years after logging. Using the fitted model, we estimated that two years after logging both species richness and abundance of bryophytes declined, but during the following 20–30 years both recovered to the level of conservation aspens. However, logging-induced changes in bryophyte community structure did not fully recover over the same time period. Liverwort species showed some or low potential to benefit from lifeboating and high potential to re-colonise as time since logging increases. Most moss species responded similarly, but two cushion-forming mosses benefited from the logging disturbance while several weft- or mat-forming mosses declined and did not re-colonise in 20–30 years. We conclude that retention trees do not function as equally effective lifeboats for all bryophyte species but are successful in providing suitable habitats for many species in the long-term. To be most effective, retention cuts should be located adjacent to conservation sites, which may function as sources of re-colonisation and support the populations of species that require old-growth forests. Public Library of Science 2014-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3978069/ /pubmed/24710329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093786 Text en © 2014 Oldén et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oldén, Anna
Ovaskainen, Otso
Kotiaho, Janne S.
Laaka-Lindberg, Sanna
Halme, Panu
Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not
title Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not
title_full Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not
title_fullStr Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not
title_full_unstemmed Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not
title_short Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not
title_sort bryophyte species richness on retention aspens recovers in time but community structure does not
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093786
work_keys_str_mv AT oldenanna bryophytespeciesrichnessonretentionaspensrecoversintimebutcommunitystructuredoesnot
AT ovaskainenotso bryophytespeciesrichnessonretentionaspensrecoversintimebutcommunitystructuredoesnot
AT kotiahojannes bryophytespeciesrichnessonretentionaspensrecoversintimebutcommunitystructuredoesnot
AT laakalindbergsanna bryophytespeciesrichnessonretentionaspensrecoversintimebutcommunitystructuredoesnot
AT halmepanu bryophytespeciesrichnessonretentionaspensrecoversintimebutcommunitystructuredoesnot