Cargando…

Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity

Many neurocognitive studies on the role of motor structures in action-language processing have implicitly adopted a “dictionary-like” framework within which lexical meaning is constructed on the basis of an invariant set of semantic features. The debate has thus been centered on the question of whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aravena, Pia, Courson, Mélody, Frak, Victor, Cheylus, Anne, Paulignan, Yves, Deprez, Viviane, Nazir, Tatjana A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163
_version_ 1782310550137470976
author Aravena, Pia
Courson, Mélody
Frak, Victor
Cheylus, Anne
Paulignan, Yves
Deprez, Viviane
Nazir, Tatjana A.
author_facet Aravena, Pia
Courson, Mélody
Frak, Victor
Cheylus, Anne
Paulignan, Yves
Deprez, Viviane
Nazir, Tatjana A.
author_sort Aravena, Pia
collection PubMed
description Many neurocognitive studies on the role of motor structures in action-language processing have implicitly adopted a “dictionary-like” framework within which lexical meaning is constructed on the basis of an invariant set of semantic features. The debate has thus been centered on the question of whether motor activation is an integral part of the lexical semantics (embodied theories) or the result of a post-lexical construction of a situation model (disembodied theories). However, research in psycholinguistics show that lexical semantic processing and context-dependent meaning construction are narrowly integrated. An understanding of the role of motor structures in action-language processing might thus be better achieved by focusing on the linguistic contexts under which such structures are recruited. Here, we therefore analyzed online modulations of grip force while subjects listened to target words embedded in different linguistic contexts. When the target word was a hand action verb and when the sentence focused on that action (John signs the contract) an early increase of grip force was observed. No comparable increase was detected when the same word occurred in a context that shifted the focus toward the agent's mental state (John wants to sign the contract). There mere presence of an action word is thus not sufficient to trigger motor activation. Moreover, when the linguistic context set up a strong expectation for a hand action, a grip force increase was observed even when the tested word was a pseudo-verb. The presence of a known action word is thus not required to trigger motor activation. Importantly, however, the same linguistic contexts that sufficed to trigger motor activation with pseudo-verbs failed to trigger motor activation when the target words were verbs with no motor action reference. Context is thus not by itself sufficient to supersede an “incompatible” word meaning. We argue that motor structure activation is part of a dynamic process that integrates the lexical meaning potential of a term and the context in the online construction of a situation model, which is a crucial process for fluent and efficient online language comprehension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3978346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39783462014-04-17 Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity Aravena, Pia Courson, Mélody Frak, Victor Cheylus, Anne Paulignan, Yves Deprez, Viviane Nazir, Tatjana A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Many neurocognitive studies on the role of motor structures in action-language processing have implicitly adopted a “dictionary-like” framework within which lexical meaning is constructed on the basis of an invariant set of semantic features. The debate has thus been centered on the question of whether motor activation is an integral part of the lexical semantics (embodied theories) or the result of a post-lexical construction of a situation model (disembodied theories). However, research in psycholinguistics show that lexical semantic processing and context-dependent meaning construction are narrowly integrated. An understanding of the role of motor structures in action-language processing might thus be better achieved by focusing on the linguistic contexts under which such structures are recruited. Here, we therefore analyzed online modulations of grip force while subjects listened to target words embedded in different linguistic contexts. When the target word was a hand action verb and when the sentence focused on that action (John signs the contract) an early increase of grip force was observed. No comparable increase was detected when the same word occurred in a context that shifted the focus toward the agent's mental state (John wants to sign the contract). There mere presence of an action word is thus not sufficient to trigger motor activation. Moreover, when the linguistic context set up a strong expectation for a hand action, a grip force increase was observed even when the tested word was a pseudo-verb. The presence of a known action word is thus not required to trigger motor activation. Importantly, however, the same linguistic contexts that sufficed to trigger motor activation with pseudo-verbs failed to trigger motor activation when the target words were verbs with no motor action reference. Context is thus not by itself sufficient to supersede an “incompatible” word meaning. We argue that motor structure activation is part of a dynamic process that integrates the lexical meaning potential of a term and the context in the online construction of a situation model, which is a crucial process for fluent and efficient online language comprehension. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3978346/ /pubmed/24744714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163 Text en Copyright © 2014 Aravena, Courson, Frak, Cheylus, Paulignan, Deprez and Nazir. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Aravena, Pia
Courson, Mélody
Frak, Victor
Cheylus, Anne
Paulignan, Yves
Deprez, Viviane
Nazir, Tatjana A.
Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
title Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
title_full Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
title_fullStr Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
title_full_unstemmed Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
title_short Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
title_sort action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163
work_keys_str_mv AT aravenapia actionrelevanceinlinguisticcontextdriveswordinducedmotoractivity
AT coursonmelody actionrelevanceinlinguisticcontextdriveswordinducedmotoractivity
AT frakvictor actionrelevanceinlinguisticcontextdriveswordinducedmotoractivity
AT cheylusanne actionrelevanceinlinguisticcontextdriveswordinducedmotoractivity
AT paulignanyves actionrelevanceinlinguisticcontextdriveswordinducedmotoractivity
AT deprezviviane actionrelevanceinlinguisticcontextdriveswordinducedmotoractivity
AT nazirtatjanaa actionrelevanceinlinguisticcontextdriveswordinducedmotoractivity