Cargando…

Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study

BACKGROUND: No systematic evaluation of smartphone/mobile apps for resuscitation training and real incident support is available to date. To provide medical, usability, and additional quality criteria for the development of apps, we conducted a mixed-methods sequential evaluation combining the persp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalz, Marco, Lenssen, Niklas, Felzen, Marc, Rossaint, Rolf, Tabuenca, Bernardo, Specht, Marcus, Skorning, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24647361
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2951
_version_ 1782310590023204864
author Kalz, Marco
Lenssen, Niklas
Felzen, Marc
Rossaint, Rolf
Tabuenca, Bernardo
Specht, Marcus
Skorning, Max
author_facet Kalz, Marco
Lenssen, Niklas
Felzen, Marc
Rossaint, Rolf
Tabuenca, Bernardo
Specht, Marcus
Skorning, Max
author_sort Kalz, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No systematic evaluation of smartphone/mobile apps for resuscitation training and real incident support is available to date. To provide medical, usability, and additional quality criteria for the development of apps, we conducted a mixed-methods sequential evaluation combining the perspective of medical experts and end-users. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess the quality of current mobile apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and real incident support from expert as well as end-user perspective. METHODS: Two independent medical experts evaluated the medical content of CPR apps from the Google Play store and the Apple App store. The evaluation was based on pre-defined minimum medical content requirements according to current Basic Life Support (BLS) guidelines. In a second phase, non-medical end-users tested usability and appeal of the apps that had at least met the minimum requirements. Usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS); appeal was measured with the self-developed ReactionDeck toolkit. RESULTS: Out of 61 apps, 46 were included in the experts’ evaluation. A consolidated list of 13 apps resulted for the following layperson evaluation. The interrater reliability was substantial (kappa=.61). Layperson end-users (n=14) had a high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation 1 [ICC1]=.83, P<.001, 95% CI 0.75-0.882 and ICC2=.79, P<.001, 95% CI 0.695-0.869). Their evaluation resulted in a list of 5 recommendable apps. CONCLUSIONS: Although several apps for resuscitation training and real incident support are available, very few are designed according to current BLS guidelines and offer an acceptable level of usability and hedonic quality for laypersons. The results of this study are intended to optimize the development of CPR mobile apps. The app ranking supports the informed selection of mobile apps for training situations and CPR campaigns as well as for real incident support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3978555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39785552014-04-08 Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study Kalz, Marco Lenssen, Niklas Felzen, Marc Rossaint, Rolf Tabuenca, Bernardo Specht, Marcus Skorning, Max J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: No systematic evaluation of smartphone/mobile apps for resuscitation training and real incident support is available to date. To provide medical, usability, and additional quality criteria for the development of apps, we conducted a mixed-methods sequential evaluation combining the perspective of medical experts and end-users. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess the quality of current mobile apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and real incident support from expert as well as end-user perspective. METHODS: Two independent medical experts evaluated the medical content of CPR apps from the Google Play store and the Apple App store. The evaluation was based on pre-defined minimum medical content requirements according to current Basic Life Support (BLS) guidelines. In a second phase, non-medical end-users tested usability and appeal of the apps that had at least met the minimum requirements. Usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS); appeal was measured with the self-developed ReactionDeck toolkit. RESULTS: Out of 61 apps, 46 were included in the experts’ evaluation. A consolidated list of 13 apps resulted for the following layperson evaluation. The interrater reliability was substantial (kappa=.61). Layperson end-users (n=14) had a high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation 1 [ICC1]=.83, P<.001, 95% CI 0.75-0.882 and ICC2=.79, P<.001, 95% CI 0.695-0.869). Their evaluation resulted in a list of 5 recommendable apps. CONCLUSIONS: Although several apps for resuscitation training and real incident support are available, very few are designed according to current BLS guidelines and offer an acceptable level of usability and hedonic quality for laypersons. The results of this study are intended to optimize the development of CPR mobile apps. The app ranking supports the informed selection of mobile apps for training situations and CPR campaigns as well as for real incident support. JMIR Publications Inc. 2014-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3978555/ /pubmed/24647361 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2951 Text en ©Marco Kalz, Niklas Lenssen, Marc Felzen, Rolf Rossaint, Bernardo Tabuenca, Marcus Specht, Max Skorning. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 19.03.2014. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kalz, Marco
Lenssen, Niklas
Felzen, Marc
Rossaint, Rolf
Tabuenca, Bernardo
Specht, Marcus
Skorning, Max
Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study
title Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study
title_full Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study
title_fullStr Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study
title_full_unstemmed Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study
title_short Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study
title_sort smartphone apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and real incident support: a mixed-methods evaluation study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24647361
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2951
work_keys_str_mv AT kalzmarco smartphoneappsforcardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingandrealincidentsupportamixedmethodsevaluationstudy
AT lenssenniklas smartphoneappsforcardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingandrealincidentsupportamixedmethodsevaluationstudy
AT felzenmarc smartphoneappsforcardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingandrealincidentsupportamixedmethodsevaluationstudy
AT rossaintrolf smartphoneappsforcardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingandrealincidentsupportamixedmethodsevaluationstudy
AT tabuencabernardo smartphoneappsforcardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingandrealincidentsupportamixedmethodsevaluationstudy
AT spechtmarcus smartphoneappsforcardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingandrealincidentsupportamixedmethodsevaluationstudy
AT skorningmax smartphoneappsforcardiopulmonaryresuscitationtrainingandrealincidentsupportamixedmethodsevaluationstudy