Cargando…
Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis
AIMS: To determine the optimal T1 mapping approach to assess myocardial fibrosis at 3T. METHODS AND RESULTS: T1 mapping was performed at 3T using the modified look-locker-inversion sequence in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1, the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3979453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet245 |
_version_ | 1782310730768318464 |
---|---|
author | Chin, Calvin W.L. Semple, Scott Malley, Tamir White, Audrey C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Weale, Peter J. Prasad, Sanjay Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. |
author_facet | Chin, Calvin W.L. Semple, Scott Malley, Tamir White, Audrey C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Weale, Peter J. Prasad, Sanjay Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. |
author_sort | Chin, Calvin W.L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To determine the optimal T1 mapping approach to assess myocardial fibrosis at 3T. METHODS AND RESULTS: T1 mapping was performed at 3T using the modified look-locker-inversion sequence in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1, the partition coefficient (λ; ΔR(myocardium)/ΔR(blood), where ΔR = 1/post-contrast T1 − 1/pre-contrast T1), and extracellular volume fraction [ECV; λ (1 − haematocrit)] were assessed. After establishing the optimal time point and myocardial region for analysis, we compared the reproducibility of these T1 measures and their ability to differentiate asymptomatic patients with AS from healthy volunteers. There was no segmental variation across the ventricle in any of the T1 measures evaluated. λ and ECV did not vary with time, while post-contrast T1 was relatively constant between 15 and 30 min. Thus, mid-cavity myocardium at 20 min was used for subsequent analyses. ECV displayed excellent intra-, inter-observer, and scan–rescan reproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) 1.00, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively], as did λ (ICC 0.99, 0.94, 0.93, respectively). Moreover, ECV and λ were both higher in patients with AS compared with controls (ECV 28.3 ± 1.7 vs. 26.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001; λ 0.46 ± 0.03 vs. 0.44 ± 0.03, P = 0.02), with the former offering improved differentiation. In comparison, scan–rescan reproducibilities for pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1 were only modest (ICC 0.72 and 0.56) with no differences in values observed between cases and controls (both P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ECV appears to be the most promising measure of diffuse myocardial fibrosis at 3T based upon its superior reproducibility and ability to differentiate disease from health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3979453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39794532014-04-08 Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis Chin, Calvin W.L. Semple, Scott Malley, Tamir White, Audrey C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Weale, Peter J. Prasad, Sanjay Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Articles AIMS: To determine the optimal T1 mapping approach to assess myocardial fibrosis at 3T. METHODS AND RESULTS: T1 mapping was performed at 3T using the modified look-locker-inversion sequence in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1, the partition coefficient (λ; ΔR(myocardium)/ΔR(blood), where ΔR = 1/post-contrast T1 − 1/pre-contrast T1), and extracellular volume fraction [ECV; λ (1 − haematocrit)] were assessed. After establishing the optimal time point and myocardial region for analysis, we compared the reproducibility of these T1 measures and their ability to differentiate asymptomatic patients with AS from healthy volunteers. There was no segmental variation across the ventricle in any of the T1 measures evaluated. λ and ECV did not vary with time, while post-contrast T1 was relatively constant between 15 and 30 min. Thus, mid-cavity myocardium at 20 min was used for subsequent analyses. ECV displayed excellent intra-, inter-observer, and scan–rescan reproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) 1.00, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively], as did λ (ICC 0.99, 0.94, 0.93, respectively). Moreover, ECV and λ were both higher in patients with AS compared with controls (ECV 28.3 ± 1.7 vs. 26.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001; λ 0.46 ± 0.03 vs. 0.44 ± 0.03, P = 0.02), with the former offering improved differentiation. In comparison, scan–rescan reproducibilities for pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1 were only modest (ICC 0.72 and 0.56) with no differences in values observed between cases and controls (both P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ECV appears to be the most promising measure of diffuse myocardial fibrosis at 3T based upon its superior reproducibility and ability to differentiate disease from health. Oxford University Press 2014-05 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3979453/ /pubmed/24282220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet245 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Chin, Calvin W.L. Semple, Scott Malley, Tamir White, Audrey C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Weale, Peter J. Prasad, Sanjay Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis |
title | Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis |
title_full | Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis |
title_fullStr | Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis |
title_short | Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis |
title_sort | optimization and comparison of myocardial t1 techniques at 3t in patients with aortic stenosis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3979453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chincalvinwl optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT semplescott optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT malleytamir optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT whiteaudreyc optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT mirsadraeesaeed optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT wealepeterj optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT prasadsanjay optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT newbydavide optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT dweckmarcr optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis |