Cargando…

Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis

AIMS: To determine the optimal T1 mapping approach to assess myocardial fibrosis at 3T. METHODS AND RESULTS: T1 mapping was performed at 3T using the modified look-locker-inversion sequence in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin, Calvin W.L., Semple, Scott, Malley, Tamir, White, Audrey C., Mirsadraee, Saeed, Weale, Peter J., Prasad, Sanjay, Newby, David E., Dweck, Marc R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3979453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet245
_version_ 1782310730768318464
author Chin, Calvin W.L.
Semple, Scott
Malley, Tamir
White, Audrey C.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Weale, Peter J.
Prasad, Sanjay
Newby, David E.
Dweck, Marc R.
author_facet Chin, Calvin W.L.
Semple, Scott
Malley, Tamir
White, Audrey C.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Weale, Peter J.
Prasad, Sanjay
Newby, David E.
Dweck, Marc R.
author_sort Chin, Calvin W.L.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine the optimal T1 mapping approach to assess myocardial fibrosis at 3T. METHODS AND RESULTS: T1 mapping was performed at 3T using the modified look-locker-inversion sequence in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1, the partition coefficient (λ; ΔR(myocardium)/ΔR(blood), where ΔR = 1/post-contrast T1 − 1/pre-contrast T1), and extracellular volume fraction [ECV; λ (1 − haematocrit)] were assessed. After establishing the optimal time point and myocardial region for analysis, we compared the reproducibility of these T1 measures and their ability to differentiate asymptomatic patients with AS from healthy volunteers. There was no segmental variation across the ventricle in any of the T1 measures evaluated. λ and ECV did not vary with time, while post-contrast T1 was relatively constant between 15 and 30 min. Thus, mid-cavity myocardium at 20 min was used for subsequent analyses. ECV displayed excellent intra-, inter-observer, and scan–rescan reproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) 1.00, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively], as did λ (ICC 0.99, 0.94, 0.93, respectively). Moreover, ECV and λ were both higher in patients with AS compared with controls (ECV 28.3 ± 1.7 vs. 26.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001; λ 0.46 ± 0.03 vs. 0.44 ± 0.03, P = 0.02), with the former offering improved differentiation. In comparison, scan–rescan reproducibilities for pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1 were only modest (ICC 0.72 and 0.56) with no differences in values observed between cases and controls (both P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ECV appears to be the most promising measure of diffuse myocardial fibrosis at 3T based upon its superior reproducibility and ability to differentiate disease from health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3979453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39794532014-04-08 Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis Chin, Calvin W.L. Semple, Scott Malley, Tamir White, Audrey C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Weale, Peter J. Prasad, Sanjay Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Articles AIMS: To determine the optimal T1 mapping approach to assess myocardial fibrosis at 3T. METHODS AND RESULTS: T1 mapping was performed at 3T using the modified look-locker-inversion sequence in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1, the partition coefficient (λ; ΔR(myocardium)/ΔR(blood), where ΔR = 1/post-contrast T1 − 1/pre-contrast T1), and extracellular volume fraction [ECV; λ (1 − haematocrit)] were assessed. After establishing the optimal time point and myocardial region for analysis, we compared the reproducibility of these T1 measures and their ability to differentiate asymptomatic patients with AS from healthy volunteers. There was no segmental variation across the ventricle in any of the T1 measures evaluated. λ and ECV did not vary with time, while post-contrast T1 was relatively constant between 15 and 30 min. Thus, mid-cavity myocardium at 20 min was used for subsequent analyses. ECV displayed excellent intra-, inter-observer, and scan–rescan reproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) 1.00, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively], as did λ (ICC 0.99, 0.94, 0.93, respectively). Moreover, ECV and λ were both higher in patients with AS compared with controls (ECV 28.3 ± 1.7 vs. 26.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001; λ 0.46 ± 0.03 vs. 0.44 ± 0.03, P = 0.02), with the former offering improved differentiation. In comparison, scan–rescan reproducibilities for pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1 were only modest (ICC 0.72 and 0.56) with no differences in values observed between cases and controls (both P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ECV appears to be the most promising measure of diffuse myocardial fibrosis at 3T based upon its superior reproducibility and ability to differentiate disease from health. Oxford University Press 2014-05 2013-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3979453/ /pubmed/24282220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet245 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chin, Calvin W.L.
Semple, Scott
Malley, Tamir
White, Audrey C.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Weale, Peter J.
Prasad, Sanjay
Newby, David E.
Dweck, Marc R.
Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis
title Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis
title_full Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis
title_fullStr Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis
title_short Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis
title_sort optimization and comparison of myocardial t1 techniques at 3t in patients with aortic stenosis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3979453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet245
work_keys_str_mv AT chincalvinwl optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT semplescott optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT malleytamir optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT whiteaudreyc optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT mirsadraeesaeed optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT wealepeterj optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT prasadsanjay optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT newbydavide optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT dweckmarcr optimizationandcomparisonofmyocardialt1techniquesat3tinpatientswithaorticstenosis