Cargando…

Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is at the core of patient-centered care. We examined whether young adults with type 1 diabetes perceived the clinician groups they consulted as practicing SDM. METHODS: In a web-based survey, 150 Australians aged 18–35 years and with type 1 diabetes rated sev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiley, Janice, Westbrook, Mary, Greenfield, Jerry R, Day, Richard O, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3979791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729690
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S57707
_version_ 1782310766147272704
author Wiley, Janice
Westbrook, Mary
Greenfield, Jerry R
Day, Richard O
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Wiley, Janice
Westbrook, Mary
Greenfield, Jerry R
Day, Richard O
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Wiley, Janice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is at the core of patient-centered care. We examined whether young adults with type 1 diabetes perceived the clinician groups they consulted as practicing SDM. METHODS: In a web-based survey, 150 Australians aged 18–35 years and with type 1 diabetes rated seven aspects of SDM in their interactions with endocrinologists, diabetes educators, dieticians, and general practitioners. Additionally, 33 participants in seven focus groups discussed these aspects of SDM. RESULTS: Of the 150 respondents, 90% consulted endocrinologists, 60% diabetes educators, 33% dieticians, and 37% general practitioners. The majority of participants rated all professions as oriented toward all aspects of SDM, but there were professional differences. These ranged from 94.4% to 82.2% for “My clinician enquires about how I manage my diabetes”; 93.4% to 82.2% for “My clinician listens to my opinion about my diabetes management”; 89.9% to 74.1% for “My clinician is supportive of my diabetes management”; 93.2% to 66.1% for “My clinician suggests ways in which I can improve my self-management”; 96.6% to 85.7% for “The advice of my clinician can be understood”; 98.9% to 82.2% for “The advice of my clinician can be trusted”; and 86.5% to 67.9% for “The advice of my clinician is consistent with other members of the diabetes team”. Diabetes educators received the highest ratings on all aspects of SDM. The mean weighted average of agreement to SDM for all consultations was 84.3%. Focus group participants reported actively seeking clinicians who practiced SDM. A lack of SDM was frequently cited as a reason for discontinuing consultation. The dominant three themes in focus group discussions were whether clinicians acknowledged patients’ expertise, encouraged patients’ autonomy, and provided advice that patients could utilize to improve self-management. CONCLUSION: The majority of clinicians engaged in SDM. Young adults with type 1 diabetes prefer such clinicians. They may fail to take up recommended health services when clinicians do not practice this component of patient-centered care. Such findings have implications for patient safety, improved health outcomes, and enhanced health service delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3979791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39797912014-04-11 Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus Wiley, Janice Westbrook, Mary Greenfield, Jerry R Day, Richard O Braithwaite, Jeffrey Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is at the core of patient-centered care. We examined whether young adults with type 1 diabetes perceived the clinician groups they consulted as practicing SDM. METHODS: In a web-based survey, 150 Australians aged 18–35 years and with type 1 diabetes rated seven aspects of SDM in their interactions with endocrinologists, diabetes educators, dieticians, and general practitioners. Additionally, 33 participants in seven focus groups discussed these aspects of SDM. RESULTS: Of the 150 respondents, 90% consulted endocrinologists, 60% diabetes educators, 33% dieticians, and 37% general practitioners. The majority of participants rated all professions as oriented toward all aspects of SDM, but there were professional differences. These ranged from 94.4% to 82.2% for “My clinician enquires about how I manage my diabetes”; 93.4% to 82.2% for “My clinician listens to my opinion about my diabetes management”; 89.9% to 74.1% for “My clinician is supportive of my diabetes management”; 93.2% to 66.1% for “My clinician suggests ways in which I can improve my self-management”; 96.6% to 85.7% for “The advice of my clinician can be understood”; 98.9% to 82.2% for “The advice of my clinician can be trusted”; and 86.5% to 67.9% for “The advice of my clinician is consistent with other members of the diabetes team”. Diabetes educators received the highest ratings on all aspects of SDM. The mean weighted average of agreement to SDM for all consultations was 84.3%. Focus group participants reported actively seeking clinicians who practiced SDM. A lack of SDM was frequently cited as a reason for discontinuing consultation. The dominant three themes in focus group discussions were whether clinicians acknowledged patients’ expertise, encouraged patients’ autonomy, and provided advice that patients could utilize to improve self-management. CONCLUSION: The majority of clinicians engaged in SDM. Young adults with type 1 diabetes prefer such clinicians. They may fail to take up recommended health services when clinicians do not practice this component of patient-centered care. Such findings have implications for patient safety, improved health outcomes, and enhanced health service delivery. Dove Medical Press 2014-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3979791/ /pubmed/24729690 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S57707 Text en © 2014 Wiley et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wiley, Janice
Westbrook, Mary
Greenfield, Jerry R
Day, Richard O
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus
title Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus
title_full Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus
title_short Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus
title_sort shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3979791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729690
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S57707
work_keys_str_mv AT wileyjanice shareddecisionmakingtheperspectivesofyoungadultswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT westbrookmary shareddecisionmakingtheperspectivesofyoungadultswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT greenfieldjerryr shareddecisionmakingtheperspectivesofyoungadultswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT dayrichardo shareddecisionmakingtheperspectivesofyoungadultswithtype1diabetesmellitus
AT braithwaitejeffrey shareddecisionmakingtheperspectivesofyoungadultswithtype1diabetesmellitus