Cargando…

Development of a method for adjusting trial results for biases in meta-analysis

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Turner, Rebecca, Savovic, Jelena, Jones, Hayley, Sterne, Jonathan, Welton, Nicky, Higgins, Julian
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2013
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3980294/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-P124

Ejemplares similares

A new large-scale meta-epidemiological study on bias in randomized trials using routinely collected risk-of-bias assessments by cochrane reviewers: results from the robes study
por: Savovic, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Adjusting trial results for biases in meta‐analysis: combining data‐based evidence on bias with detailed trial assessment
por: Rhodes, K. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

External validity of rct evidence in cost-effectiveness analyses. A review of recent technology appraisals for nice and proposed methods of adjustment
por: Mantopoulos, Theodoros, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A novel approach to understanding outcome selection and reporting during the evaluation of innovative surgery from first in human to pragmatic RCT: an evolution review
por: Howes, Noah, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3: Heterogeneity—Subgroups, Meta-Regression, Bias, and Bias-Adjustment
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Outcomes reported in trials of methods for the induction of labour
por: Medley, Nancy, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised clinical trials
por: Towsend, Daisy, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Agreement was moderate between data-based and opinion-based assessments of biases affecting randomized trials within meta-analyses
por: Turner, Rebecca M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis
por: Naci, Huseyin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Estimating the effect of “treatment in the treated” - instrumental variable analysis vs conventional regression methods in the titre-2 trial in cardiac surgery
por: Rogers, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study
por: Moustgaard, Helene, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is innovation in surgery less than ideal? A case study of acellular dermal matrix assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction
por: Potter, Shelley, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
por: Thompson, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Equivalence of entropy balancing and the method of moments for matching‐adjusted indirect comparison
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Sensitivity of treatment recommendations to bias in network meta‐analysis
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of bias and precision in methods of analysis for pragmatic trials with missing outcome data: a simulation study
por: Joseph, Royes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Use of a random effects meta‐analysis in the design and analysis of a new clinical trial
por: Jones, Hayley E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis
por: López-López, José A, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
por: Whiting, Penny, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Characterization of the mechanical ventilator adjustment process
por: Al-Otaibi, H, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Adjusting for informative missing outcome data in clinical trials with longitudinal study designs
por: Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Redesign of quality improvement work methods in the community in the health care organization in Israel
por: Goldfracht, Margalit, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Guidance to detect, evaluate and prevent the problem of selective reporting in trial publications
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Multilevel network meta‐regression for population‐adjusted treatment comparisons
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Titration of analgosedation with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in the ICU
por: Sucre, MJ, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Is neurally adjusted ventilatory assist feasible during anesthesia?
por: Campoccia Jalde, F, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The CONSENSUS Study: Preliminary results of a mixed methods study to develop a core outcome set for late phase clinical trials in Oropharyngeal Cancer
por: Waters, Aoife M I, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The role of cluster size and intra-cluster correlations when adjusting for covariates in the analysis of cluster randomised trials
por: Wright, Neil
Publicado: (2015)

Estimation bias in survival data within clinical trials that use adaptive seamless designs
por: Khan, Josephine, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Rapid molecular test (SeptiFast(®)) reduced time for adjustment of antibiotic treatment in comparison with conventional blood cultures in critically ill sepsis patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial (preliminary results)
por: Rodrigues, Cristhieni, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assistance in patients with critical illness polyneuromyopathy
por: Tuchscherer, D, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Analyzing and minimizing bias in Illumina sequencing libraries
por: Aird, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_f2aj8g9q5n7bf5f8sdmsg0gae4