Cargando…

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Macefield, Rhiannon, Blencowe, Natalie, Brookes, Sara, Jacobs, Marc, Sprangers, Mirjam, Williamson, Paula, Blazeby, Jane
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2013
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3980343/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-P77

Ejemplares similares

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

What is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?
por: Chalmers, Katy, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The case for a HRQL core outcome set: outcome reporting bias in oesophageal cancer studies
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Choosing outcomes for a core outcome set: does provision of feedback between delphi survey rounds help prioritise items?
por: Coulman, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection
por: McNair, Angus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How are trial outcomes prioritised by stakeholders from different regions? Analysis of an international Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in gastric cancer surgery
por: Alkhaffaf, Bilal, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in gastro-intestinal (GI) cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the need for adequate rationale and integrated reporting
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial
por: Brookes, Sara T., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

‘Trial Exegesis’: Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of a ‘universal-reporter’ outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery
por: Avery, Kerry N. L., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Identification of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for surgical innovation: a targeted review of case studies of novel surgical devices
por: Wilson, Nicholas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery
por: Potter, S., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery
por: Stevens, Daniel J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A Core Outcome Set for Seamless, Standardized Evaluation of Innovative Surgical Procedures and Devices (COHESIVE): A Patient and Professional Stakeholder Consensus Study
por: Avery, Kerry N.L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Patient participation in Delphi surveys to develop core outcome sets: systematic review
por: Barrington, Heather, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (the GASTROS study)
por: Alkhaffaf, Bilal, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set
por: Young, Amber, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methods for selecting health concepts and domains from in-depth qualitative interviews for the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS): a case study
por: Blazeby, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: five years on
por: Williamson, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Exploring methods the for selection and integration of stakeholder views in the development of core outcome sets: a case study in reconstructive breast surgery
por: Potter, Shelley, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A systematic scoping review protocol to summarise and appraise the use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive general surgical procedures
por: King, Anni, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer
por: Fish, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The development of a colorectal cancer surgery core outcome set
por: McNair, AGK, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development
por: Keeley, T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Participating in core outcome set development via Delphi surveys: qualitative interviews provide pointers to inform guidance
por: Biggane, Alice M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Physical Rehabilitation Core Outcomes In Critical illness (PRACTICE): protocol for development of a core outcome set
por: Connolly, Bronwen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6kqbttsqna335orklvc4engs49