Cargando…

PB.13: Comparison between analogue and digital mammography: a reader's perspective

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gay, H, Pietrosanu, R, George, S, Tzias, D, Mehta, R, Patel, C, Heller, S, Wilkinson, L
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2013
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3980347/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3513

Ejemplares similares

Structured evaluation of the effectiveness of an interactive tool for developing interpretation skills in mammography
por: Pietrosanu, R, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Assessing mammography film-reader performance
por: Wilkinson, LS, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

PB.33: Vacuum-assisted biopsy for lesions of uncertain malignant potential: further evidence of its suitability as a safe alternative to surgery
por: Tzias, D, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PB.37: Screen-detected, noncalcified, mammographic lesions with normal or benign ultrasound findings: is stereotactic biopsy necessary?
por: Tzias, D, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quantification of breast cancer risk based on the UK five-point classification system
por: Tzias, D, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

PB.23: Effect of detector type on cancer detection in digital mammography
por: Mackenzie, A, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PB.16: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: a single-centre experience
por: O'Neill, SB, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PB.37. Does conventional imaging accurately predict the extent of disease in women with dense breasts? If so, does this have a significant impact on patient surgical outcome?
por: Scott, V, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Contrast-enhanced MRI in evaluating the contralateral breast for synchronous malignancy in patients with invasive lobular cancer
por: Pietrosanu, R, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

PB.16. Breast screening mammograms: recall or not to recall. What is the golden ratio?
por: Sever, AR, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

PB.25. Implementation of two new digital mammography technologies for Breast Test Wales: more or less accurate?
por: Evans, T, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Digital mammography: the human factors implications
por: Brace, C, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Every second counts: digital and analogue mammography - comparison of reading times at the Queen Elizabeth Breast Screening Unit, Gateshead, UK
por: Bristow, GD, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

PB.15: Pain in mammography: where and why does it arise?
por: O'Leary, D, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PB.13. Impact on film reading of moving from analogue to digital screening: a service evaluation - South East Scotland Breast Screening Programme
por: Babu, G, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

PB.47: Mammography in symptomatic women aged 35 to 39 years
por: Chan, VW, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PB.14. An analysis of subtle alterations in reading pattern with the introduction of digital mammography screening: South East Scotland Breast Screening Programme
por: Babu, G, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Performance in digital mammography with and without film prior mammograms
por: Taylor-Phillips, S, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Comparison of dedicated digital specimen radiography with direct digital specimen mammography images
por: Morel, JC, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

PB.20. Audit of 5 years of routine screening mammography of the reconstructed breast
por: Ray, A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

PB.41: Audit of screening-detected breast cancers with discordant interpretations on double-read screening mammography
por: Batohi, B, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Eliciting requirements for a mammography training application
por: Taylor, PM, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The feasibility of vision-supported computer-based training in digital mammography
por: Chen, Y, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

A comparison of reading times in full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
por: Connor, SJ, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

PB.19: Investigation of a novel method for breast discomfort reduction during mammography
por: O'Leary, D, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Two-view 2D digital mammography versus one-view digital breast tomosynthesis
por: Michell, MJ, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Image quality and compression force: the forgotten link in optimisation of digital mammography?
por: O'Leary, D, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Study of the availability of digital mammography for premenopausal women in the Valencian Breast Cancer Early Detection Program
por: Ramos, M, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Changes in recall rate, biopsy rate and cancer detection since the introduction of digital mammography
por: Fyall, TG, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The Dutch experience of digital mammography in screening
por: van Engen, R
Publicado: (2006)

Impact of full-field digital mammography on diagnostic work-up and surgical management of mammographic microcalcification
por: Bundred, SM, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

AI in breast screening mammography: breast screening readers' perspectives
por: de Vries, Clarisse Florence, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

DMISTifying digital mammography in the USA
por: D'Orsi, C
Publicado: (2006)

Correlation of ethnicity with breast density as assessed by Quantra™
por: Tzias, D, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Quality assurance of full field digital mammography
por: van Engen, R
Publicado: (2008)

PB.17: Inter-observer agreement in visual analogue scale assessment of percentage breast density
por: Sergeant, JC, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

An audit of women attending for technical repeat mammography at the South West London Breast Screening Service between 1991 and 2004
por: Morris, CM, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Dependence of detectability of microcalcification clusters on quality of mammography images
por: Warren, LM, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Digital mammography in the United Kingdom: the reality
por: Wallis, M
Publicado: (2006)

Comparison of analogue and digital mammographic appearances of screen-detected invasive breast cancers
por: Jones, TW, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_kl85dji6i4r6akpbhdru0of6pt