Cargando…

Pro’s and con’s of the stepped wedge design in cluster randomised trials of quality improvement interventions: two current examples

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Dreischulte, Tobias, Grant, Aileen, Donnan, Peter, Guthrie, Bruce
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2013
Materias:	Oral Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3980706/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-O87

Ejemplares similares

Parallel process evaluation using a proposed framework for the design and reporting of process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions
por: Grant, Aileen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A cluster randomised stepped wedge trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted information technology-based intervention in reducing high-risk prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antiplatelets in primary medical care: The DQIP study protocol
por: Dreischulte, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting
por: Grant, Aileen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Study protocol of a mixed-methods evaluation of a cluster randomized trial to improve the safety of NSAID and antiplatelet prescribing: data-driven quality improvement in primary care
por: Grant, Aileen, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Process evaluation of the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) trial: active and less active ingredients of a multi-component complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribing
por: Grant, Aileen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Process evaluation of the Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care (DQIP) trial: case study evaluation of adoption and maintenance of a complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribing
por: Grant, Aileen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The feedback intervention trial: a national stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to improve hand hygiene
por: Stone, S
Publicado: (2011)

Developing a complex intervention to improve prescribing safety in primary care: mixed methods feasibility and optimisation pilot study
por: Grant, Aileen M, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Process evaluation of the Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care (DQIP) trial: quantitative examination of variation between practices in recruitment, implementation and effectiveness
por: Dreischulte, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of the stepped wedge design efficiency
por: Baio, Gianluca, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: where, when and why?
por: Grayling, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
por: Grayling, Michael J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Bad apples or spoiled barrels? Multilevel modelling analysis of variation in high-risk prescribing in Scotland between general practitioners and between the practices they work in
por: Guthrie, Bruce, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Pros & Cons
por: Herr, Yeek
Publicado: (2011)

Introducing the new CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review
por: Kristunas, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
por: Martin, James Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Assessing sensitivity to assumptions in mixed effects analyses of stepped-wedge trials
por: Davey, Calum, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Robotic exoskeletons: The current pros and cons
por: Gorgey, Ashraf S
Publicado: (2018)

What is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?
por: Chalmers, Katy, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Quality and safety of medication use in primary care: consensus validation of a new set of explicit medication assessment criteria and prioritisation of topics for improvement
por: Dreischulte, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Supercollider: Pros and cons
Publicado: (1993)

Circumcision: Pros and cons
por: Burgu, Berk, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

The pros and cons of degeneracy
por: Goaillard, Jean-Marc, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Considering the design effect for the stepped wedge trial: what can it tell us?
por: Thompson, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: some variations on the common design
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact of a multimodal hand hygiene improvement intervention in a 1000-bed hospital in NE Thailand: a stepped wedge clustered randomized controlled trial
por: Hongsuwan, M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available
por: Barker, D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Sedation AND Weaning In Children (SANDWICH): protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge trial
por: Blackwood, Bronagh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Medical dramas – the pros and the cons
por: Aboud, Khalid Al
Publicado: (2012)

Pros and cons of student journals
por: Aboshady, Omar Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Rheumatology in Greece: pros and cons
por: Moutsopoulos, Haralampos M.
Publicado: (2020)

Veterinary nanomedicine: Pros and cons
por: Jafary, Fariba, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies
por: Prost, Audrey, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessment of the advantage of the serum S100B protein biomonitoring in the management of paediatric mild traumatic brain injury—PROS100B: protocol of a multicentre unblinded stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
por: Bouvier, Damien, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The current use of feasibility studies in the assessment of feasibility for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review
por: Kristunas, Caroline A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Current methods for diagnosis of human coronaviruses: pros and cons
por: Benzigar, Mercy R, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

OPTIMISE: a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised trial of an intervention to improve primary care for refugees in Australia
por: Russell, Grant M, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_09686s35ejd58v4qj4puu2g45l