Cargando…

The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men

Aim. This study aimed to investigate which anthropometric indices could be a better predictor of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the cut-off points for these surrogates to appropriately differentiate MetS in the Iranian elderly. Method. The present cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of Is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gharipour, Mojgan, Sadeghi, Masoumeh, Dianatkhah, Minoo, Bidmeshgi, Shirin, Ahmadi, Alireza, Tahri, Marzieh, Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3981184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24782923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/907149
_version_ 1782310991445360640
author Gharipour, Mojgan
Sadeghi, Masoumeh
Dianatkhah, Minoo
Bidmeshgi, Shirin
Ahmadi, Alireza
Tahri, Marzieh
Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
author_facet Gharipour, Mojgan
Sadeghi, Masoumeh
Dianatkhah, Minoo
Bidmeshgi, Shirin
Ahmadi, Alireza
Tahri, Marzieh
Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
author_sort Gharipour, Mojgan
collection PubMed
description Aim. This study aimed to investigate which anthropometric indices could be a better predictor of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the cut-off points for these surrogates to appropriately differentiate MetS in the Iranian elderly. Method. The present cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of Isfahan Healthy Heart Program (IHHP). MetS was defined according to Third Adult Treatment Panel (ATPIII). In total, 206 elderly subjects with MetS criteria were selected. Anthropometric indices were measured and plotted using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results. WC followed by WHtR yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.683; 95% CI 0.606–0.761 and 0.680; 95% CI 0.602–0.758, resp.) for MetS. WC at a cut of 94.5 cm resulted in the highest Youden index with sensitivity 64% and 68% specificity to predict the presence of ≥2 metabolic risk factors. BMI had the lowest sensitivity and specificity for MetS and MetS components. WC has the best ability to detect MetS which followed by WHtR and BMI had a lower discriminating value comparatively. Conclusion. WC is the best predictor for predicting the presence of ≥2 metabolic risk factors among Iranian elderly population and the best value of WC is 94.5 cm. This cut-off values of WC should be advocated and used in Iranian men until larger cross-sectional studies show different results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3981184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39811842014-04-29 The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men Gharipour, Mojgan Sadeghi, Masoumeh Dianatkhah, Minoo Bidmeshgi, Shirin Ahmadi, Alireza Tahri, Marzieh Sarrafzadegan, Nizal J Obes Research Article Aim. This study aimed to investigate which anthropometric indices could be a better predictor of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the cut-off points for these surrogates to appropriately differentiate MetS in the Iranian elderly. Method. The present cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of Isfahan Healthy Heart Program (IHHP). MetS was defined according to Third Adult Treatment Panel (ATPIII). In total, 206 elderly subjects with MetS criteria were selected. Anthropometric indices were measured and plotted using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results. WC followed by WHtR yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.683; 95% CI 0.606–0.761 and 0.680; 95% CI 0.602–0.758, resp.) for MetS. WC at a cut of 94.5 cm resulted in the highest Youden index with sensitivity 64% and 68% specificity to predict the presence of ≥2 metabolic risk factors. BMI had the lowest sensitivity and specificity for MetS and MetS components. WC has the best ability to detect MetS which followed by WHtR and BMI had a lower discriminating value comparatively. Conclusion. WC is the best predictor for predicting the presence of ≥2 metabolic risk factors among Iranian elderly population and the best value of WC is 94.5 cm. This cut-off values of WC should be advocated and used in Iranian men until larger cross-sectional studies show different results. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3981184/ /pubmed/24782923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/907149 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mojgan Gharipour et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gharipour, Mojgan
Sadeghi, Masoumeh
Dianatkhah, Minoo
Bidmeshgi, Shirin
Ahmadi, Alireza
Tahri, Marzieh
Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men
title The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men
title_full The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men
title_fullStr The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men
title_full_unstemmed The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men
title_short The Cut-Off Values of Anthropometric Indices for Identifying Subjects at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Elderly Men
title_sort cut-off values of anthropometric indices for identifying subjects at risk for metabolic syndrome in iranian elderly men
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3981184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24782923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/907149
work_keys_str_mv AT gharipourmojgan thecutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT sadeghimasoumeh thecutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT dianatkhahminoo thecutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT bidmeshgishirin thecutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT ahmadialireza thecutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT tahrimarzieh thecutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT sarrafzadegannizal thecutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT gharipourmojgan cutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT sadeghimasoumeh cutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT dianatkhahminoo cutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT bidmeshgishirin cutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT ahmadialireza cutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT tahrimarzieh cutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen
AT sarrafzadegannizal cutoffvaluesofanthropometricindicesforidentifyingsubjectsatriskformetabolicsyndromeiniranianelderlymen