Cargando…

Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis

The consequences of phrenic nerve paralysis vary from a considerable reduction in respiratory function to an apparently normal state. Acoustic analysis of lung sound intensity (LSI) could be an indirect non-invasive measurement of respiratory muscle function, comparing activity on the two sides of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiz, José Antonio, Jané, Raimon, Lozano, Manuel, Gómez, Rosa, Ruiz, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3981712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24718599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093595
_version_ 1782311093957296128
author Fiz, José Antonio
Jané, Raimon
Lozano, Manuel
Gómez, Rosa
Ruiz, Juan
author_facet Fiz, José Antonio
Jané, Raimon
Lozano, Manuel
Gómez, Rosa
Ruiz, Juan
author_sort Fiz, José Antonio
collection PubMed
description The consequences of phrenic nerve paralysis vary from a considerable reduction in respiratory function to an apparently normal state. Acoustic analysis of lung sound intensity (LSI) could be an indirect non-invasive measurement of respiratory muscle function, comparing activity on the two sides of the thoracic cage. Lung sounds and airflow were recorded in ten males with unilateral phrenic paralysis and ten healthy subjects (5 men/5 women), during progressive increasing airflow maneuvers. Subjects were in sitting position and two acoustic sensors were placed on their back, on the left and right sides. LSI was determined from 1.2 to 2.4 L/s between 70 and 2000 Hz. LSI was significantly greater on the normal (19.3±4.0 dB) than the affected (5.7±3.5 dB) side in all patients (p = 0.0002), differences ranging from 9.9 to 21.3 dB (13.5±3.5 dB). In the healthy subjects, the LSI was similar on both left (15.1±6.3 dB) and right (17.4±5.7 dB) sides (p = 0.2730), differences ranging from 0.4 to 4.6 dB (2.3±1.6 dB). There was a positive linear relationship between the LSI and the airflow, with clear differences between the slope of patients (about 5 dB/L/s) and healthy subjects (about 10 dB/L/s). Furthermore, the LSI from the affected side of patients was close to the background noise level, at low airflows. As the airflow increases, the LSI from the affected side did also increase, but never reached the levels seen in healthy subjects. Moreover, the difference in LSI between healthy and paralyzed sides was higher in patients with lower FEV(1) (%). The acoustic analysis of LSI is a relevant non-invasive technique to assess respiratory function. This method could reinforce the reliability of the diagnosis of unilateral phrenic paralysis, as well as the monitoring of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3981712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39817122014-04-11 Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis Fiz, José Antonio Jané, Raimon Lozano, Manuel Gómez, Rosa Ruiz, Juan PLoS One Research Article The consequences of phrenic nerve paralysis vary from a considerable reduction in respiratory function to an apparently normal state. Acoustic analysis of lung sound intensity (LSI) could be an indirect non-invasive measurement of respiratory muscle function, comparing activity on the two sides of the thoracic cage. Lung sounds and airflow were recorded in ten males with unilateral phrenic paralysis and ten healthy subjects (5 men/5 women), during progressive increasing airflow maneuvers. Subjects were in sitting position and two acoustic sensors were placed on their back, on the left and right sides. LSI was determined from 1.2 to 2.4 L/s between 70 and 2000 Hz. LSI was significantly greater on the normal (19.3±4.0 dB) than the affected (5.7±3.5 dB) side in all patients (p = 0.0002), differences ranging from 9.9 to 21.3 dB (13.5±3.5 dB). In the healthy subjects, the LSI was similar on both left (15.1±6.3 dB) and right (17.4±5.7 dB) sides (p = 0.2730), differences ranging from 0.4 to 4.6 dB (2.3±1.6 dB). There was a positive linear relationship between the LSI and the airflow, with clear differences between the slope of patients (about 5 dB/L/s) and healthy subjects (about 10 dB/L/s). Furthermore, the LSI from the affected side of patients was close to the background noise level, at low airflows. As the airflow increases, the LSI from the affected side did also increase, but never reached the levels seen in healthy subjects. Moreover, the difference in LSI between healthy and paralyzed sides was higher in patients with lower FEV(1) (%). The acoustic analysis of LSI is a relevant non-invasive technique to assess respiratory function. This method could reinforce the reliability of the diagnosis of unilateral phrenic paralysis, as well as the monitoring of these patients. Public Library of Science 2014-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3981712/ /pubmed/24718599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093595 Text en © 2014 Fiz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fiz, José Antonio
Jané, Raimon
Lozano, Manuel
Gómez, Rosa
Ruiz, Juan
Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis
title Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis
title_full Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis
title_fullStr Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis
title_short Detecting Unilateral Phrenic Paralysis by Acoustic Respiratory Analysis
title_sort detecting unilateral phrenic paralysis by acoustic respiratory analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3981712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24718599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093595
work_keys_str_mv AT fizjoseantonio detectingunilateralphrenicparalysisbyacousticrespiratoryanalysis
AT janeraimon detectingunilateralphrenicparalysisbyacousticrespiratoryanalysis
AT lozanomanuel detectingunilateralphrenicparalysisbyacousticrespiratoryanalysis
AT gomezrosa detectingunilateralphrenicparalysisbyacousticrespiratoryanalysis
AT ruizjuan detectingunilateralphrenicparalysisbyacousticrespiratoryanalysis