Cargando…

Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model

BACKGROUND: Workers with persistent disabilities after orthopaedic trauma may need occupational rehabilitation. Despite various risk profiles for non-return-to-work (non-RTW), there is no available predictive model. Moreover, injured workers may have various origins (immigrant workers), which may ei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luthi, François, Deriaz, Olivier, Vuistiner, Philippe, Burrus, Cyrille, Hilfiker, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3981787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24718689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094268
_version_ 1782311109639798784
author Luthi, François
Deriaz, Olivier
Vuistiner, Philippe
Burrus, Cyrille
Hilfiker, Roger
author_facet Luthi, François
Deriaz, Olivier
Vuistiner, Philippe
Burrus, Cyrille
Hilfiker, Roger
author_sort Luthi, François
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Workers with persistent disabilities after orthopaedic trauma may need occupational rehabilitation. Despite various risk profiles for non-return-to-work (non-RTW), there is no available predictive model. Moreover, injured workers may have various origins (immigrant workers), which may either affect their return to work or their eligibility for research purposes. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model that estimates the likelihood of non-RTW after occupational rehabilitation using predictors which do not rely on the worker’s background. METHODS: Prospective cohort study (3177 participants, native (51%) and immigrant workers (49%)) with two samples: a) Development sample with patients from 2004 to 2007 with Full and Reduced Models, b) External validation of the Reduced Model with patients from 2008 to March 2010. We collected patients’ data and biopsychosocial complexity with an observer rated interview (INTERMED). Non-RTW was assessed two years after discharge from the rehabilitation. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and calibration was evaluated with a calibration plot. The model was reduced with random forests. RESULTS: At 2 years, the non-RTW status was known for 2462 patients (77.5% of the total sample). The prevalence of non-RTW was 50%. The full model (36 items) and the reduced model (19 items) had acceptable discrimination performance (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.78 and 0.74, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.76, respectively) and good calibration. For the validation model, the discrimination performance was acceptable (AUC 0.73; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.77) and calibration was also adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Non-RTW may be predicted with a simple model constructed with variables independent of the patient’s education and language fluency. This model is useful for all kinds of trauma in order to adjust for case mix and it is applicable to vulnerable populations like immigrant workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3981787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39817872014-04-11 Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model Luthi, François Deriaz, Olivier Vuistiner, Philippe Burrus, Cyrille Hilfiker, Roger PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Workers with persistent disabilities after orthopaedic trauma may need occupational rehabilitation. Despite various risk profiles for non-return-to-work (non-RTW), there is no available predictive model. Moreover, injured workers may have various origins (immigrant workers), which may either affect their return to work or their eligibility for research purposes. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model that estimates the likelihood of non-RTW after occupational rehabilitation using predictors which do not rely on the worker’s background. METHODS: Prospective cohort study (3177 participants, native (51%) and immigrant workers (49%)) with two samples: a) Development sample with patients from 2004 to 2007 with Full and Reduced Models, b) External validation of the Reduced Model with patients from 2008 to March 2010. We collected patients’ data and biopsychosocial complexity with an observer rated interview (INTERMED). Non-RTW was assessed two years after discharge from the rehabilitation. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and calibration was evaluated with a calibration plot. The model was reduced with random forests. RESULTS: At 2 years, the non-RTW status was known for 2462 patients (77.5% of the total sample). The prevalence of non-RTW was 50%. The full model (36 items) and the reduced model (19 items) had acceptable discrimination performance (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.78 and 0.74, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.76, respectively) and good calibration. For the validation model, the discrimination performance was acceptable (AUC 0.73; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.77) and calibration was also adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Non-RTW may be predicted with a simple model constructed with variables independent of the patient’s education and language fluency. This model is useful for all kinds of trauma in order to adjust for case mix and it is applicable to vulnerable populations like immigrant workers. Public Library of Science 2014-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3981787/ /pubmed/24718689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094268 Text en © 2014 Luthi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luthi, François
Deriaz, Olivier
Vuistiner, Philippe
Burrus, Cyrille
Hilfiker, Roger
Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model
title Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model
title_full Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model
title_fullStr Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model
title_short Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model
title_sort predicting non return to work after orthopaedic trauma: the wallis occupational rehabilitation risk (worrk) model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3981787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24718689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094268
work_keys_str_mv AT luthifrancois predictingnonreturntoworkafterorthopaedictraumathewallisoccupationalrehabilitationriskworrkmodel
AT deriazolivier predictingnonreturntoworkafterorthopaedictraumathewallisoccupationalrehabilitationriskworrkmodel
AT vuistinerphilippe predictingnonreturntoworkafterorthopaedictraumathewallisoccupationalrehabilitationriskworrkmodel
AT burruscyrille predictingnonreturntoworkafterorthopaedictraumathewallisoccupationalrehabilitationriskworrkmodel
AT hilfikerroger predictingnonreturntoworkafterorthopaedictraumathewallisoccupationalrehabilitationriskworrkmodel