Cargando…

Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes

Lewis phenotypes using various types of specimen were compared with the Lewis phenotype predicted from Lewis and Secretor genotypes. This is the first logical step in explaining the association between the Lewis expression and Helicobacter pylori. We performed a study of the followings on 209 patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Yun Ji, Hwang, Sang Mee, Kim, Taek Soo, Song, Eun Young, Park, Kyoung Un, Song, Junghan, Han, Kyou-Sup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3982271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24783214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/573652
_version_ 1782311161558990848
author Hong, Yun Ji
Hwang, Sang Mee
Kim, Taek Soo
Song, Eun Young
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Junghan
Han, Kyou-Sup
author_facet Hong, Yun Ji
Hwang, Sang Mee
Kim, Taek Soo
Song, Eun Young
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Junghan
Han, Kyou-Sup
author_sort Hong, Yun Ji
collection PubMed
description Lewis phenotypes using various types of specimen were compared with the Lewis phenotype predicted from Lewis and Secretor genotypes. This is the first logical step in explaining the association between the Lewis expression and Helicobacter pylori. We performed a study of the followings on 209 patients who underwent routine gastroscopy: erythrocyte and saliva Lewis phenotyping, gastric Lewis phenotyping by the tissue array, and the Lewis and Secretor genes genotyping. The results of phenotyping were as follows [Le(a−b−), Le(a+b−), Le(a−b+), and Le(a+b+), respectively, in order]: erythrocyte (12.4%, 25.8%, 61.2%, and 0.5%); saliva (2.4%, 27.3%, 70.3%, and 0.0%); gastric mucosa (8.1%, 6.7%, 45.5%, and 39.7%). The frequency of Le, le (59/508), le (59/1067) , and le (59) alleles was 74.6%, 21.3%, 3.1%, and 1.0%, respectively, among 418 alleles. The saliva Lewis phenotype was completely consistent with the Lewis phenotype inferred from Lewis and Secretor genotypes, but that of gastric mucosa could not be predicted from genotypes. Lewis phenotyping using erythrocytes is only adequate for transfusion needs. Saliva testing for the Lewis phenotype is a more reliable method for determining the peripheral Lewis phenotype of an individual and the gastric Lewis phenotype must be used for the study on the association between Helicobacter pylori and the Lewis phenotype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3982271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39822712014-04-29 Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes Hong, Yun Ji Hwang, Sang Mee Kim, Taek Soo Song, Eun Young Park, Kyoung Un Song, Junghan Han, Kyou-Sup Biomed Res Int Research Article Lewis phenotypes using various types of specimen were compared with the Lewis phenotype predicted from Lewis and Secretor genotypes. This is the first logical step in explaining the association between the Lewis expression and Helicobacter pylori. We performed a study of the followings on 209 patients who underwent routine gastroscopy: erythrocyte and saliva Lewis phenotyping, gastric Lewis phenotyping by the tissue array, and the Lewis and Secretor genes genotyping. The results of phenotyping were as follows [Le(a−b−), Le(a+b−), Le(a−b+), and Le(a+b+), respectively, in order]: erythrocyte (12.4%, 25.8%, 61.2%, and 0.5%); saliva (2.4%, 27.3%, 70.3%, and 0.0%); gastric mucosa (8.1%, 6.7%, 45.5%, and 39.7%). The frequency of Le, le (59/508), le (59/1067) , and le (59) alleles was 74.6%, 21.3%, 3.1%, and 1.0%, respectively, among 418 alleles. The saliva Lewis phenotype was completely consistent with the Lewis phenotype inferred from Lewis and Secretor genotypes, but that of gastric mucosa could not be predicted from genotypes. Lewis phenotyping using erythrocytes is only adequate for transfusion needs. Saliva testing for the Lewis phenotype is a more reliable method for determining the peripheral Lewis phenotype of an individual and the gastric Lewis phenotype must be used for the study on the association between Helicobacter pylori and the Lewis phenotype. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3982271/ /pubmed/24783214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/573652 Text en Copyright © 2014 Yun Ji Hong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hong, Yun Ji
Hwang, Sang Mee
Kim, Taek Soo
Song, Eun Young
Park, Kyoung Un
Song, Junghan
Han, Kyou-Sup
Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes
title Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes
title_full Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes
title_fullStr Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes
title_full_unstemmed Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes
title_short Significance of Lewis Phenotyping Using Saliva and Gastric Tissue: Comparison with the Lewis Phenotype Inferred from Lewis and Secretor Genotypes
title_sort significance of lewis phenotyping using saliva and gastric tissue: comparison with the lewis phenotype inferred from lewis and secretor genotypes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3982271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24783214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/573652
work_keys_str_mv AT hongyunji significanceoflewisphenotypingusingsalivaandgastrictissuecomparisonwiththelewisphenotypeinferredfromlewisandsecretorgenotypes
AT hwangsangmee significanceoflewisphenotypingusingsalivaandgastrictissuecomparisonwiththelewisphenotypeinferredfromlewisandsecretorgenotypes
AT kimtaeksoo significanceoflewisphenotypingusingsalivaandgastrictissuecomparisonwiththelewisphenotypeinferredfromlewisandsecretorgenotypes
AT songeunyoung significanceoflewisphenotypingusingsalivaandgastrictissuecomparisonwiththelewisphenotypeinferredfromlewisandsecretorgenotypes
AT parkkyoungun significanceoflewisphenotypingusingsalivaandgastrictissuecomparisonwiththelewisphenotypeinferredfromlewisandsecretorgenotypes
AT songjunghan significanceoflewisphenotypingusingsalivaandgastrictissuecomparisonwiththelewisphenotypeinferredfromlewisandsecretorgenotypes
AT hankyousup significanceoflewisphenotypingusingsalivaandgastrictissuecomparisonwiththelewisphenotypeinferredfromlewisandsecretorgenotypes