Cargando…

Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor

[Image: see text] The adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) belongs to the superfamily of membrane proteins called the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that form one of the largest superfamilies of drug targets. Deriving thermostable mutants has been one of the strategies used for crystallization of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sangbae, Bhattacharya, Supriyo, Grisshammer, Reinhard, Tate, Christopher, Vaidehi, Nagarajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24579769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp411618h
_version_ 1782311309853851648
author Lee, Sangbae
Bhattacharya, Supriyo
Grisshammer, Reinhard
Tate, Christopher
Vaidehi, Nagarajan
author_facet Lee, Sangbae
Bhattacharya, Supriyo
Grisshammer, Reinhard
Tate, Christopher
Vaidehi, Nagarajan
author_sort Lee, Sangbae
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) belongs to the superfamily of membrane proteins called the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that form one of the largest superfamilies of drug targets. Deriving thermostable mutants has been one of the strategies used for crystallization of A(2A)R in both the agonist and antagonist bound conformational states. The crystal structures do not reveal differences in the activation mechanism of the mutant receptors compared to the wild type receptor, that have been observed experimentally. These differences stem from the dynamic behavior of the mutant receptors. Furthermore, it is not understood how the mutations confer thermostability. Since these details are difficult to obtain from experiments, we have used atomic level simulations to elucidate the dynamic behavior of the agonist and antagonist bound mutants as well the wild type A(2A)R. We found that significant enthalpic contribution leads to stabilization of both the inactive state (StaR2) and active-like state (GL31) thermostable mutants of A(2A)R. Stabilization resulting from mutations of bulky residues to alanine is due to the formation of interhelical hydrogen bonds and van der Waals packing that improves the transmembrane domain packing. The thermostable mutant GL31 shows less movement of the transmembrane helix TM6 with respect to TM3 than the wild type receptor. While restricted dynamics of GL31 is advantageous in its purification and crystallization, it could also be the reason why these mutants are not efficient in activating the G proteins. We observed that the calculated stress on each residue is higher in the wild type receptor compared to the thermostable mutants, and this stress is required for activation to occur. Thus, reduced dynamic behavior of the thermostable mutants leading to lowered activation of these receptors originates from reduced stress on each residue. Finally, accurate calculation of the change in free energy for single mutations shows good correlation with the change in the measured thermostability. These results provide insights into the effect of mutations that can be incorporated in deriving thermostable mutants for other GPCRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3983344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39833442015-02-28 Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor Lee, Sangbae Bhattacharya, Supriyo Grisshammer, Reinhard Tate, Christopher Vaidehi, Nagarajan J Phys Chem B [Image: see text] The adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) belongs to the superfamily of membrane proteins called the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that form one of the largest superfamilies of drug targets. Deriving thermostable mutants has been one of the strategies used for crystallization of A(2A)R in both the agonist and antagonist bound conformational states. The crystal structures do not reveal differences in the activation mechanism of the mutant receptors compared to the wild type receptor, that have been observed experimentally. These differences stem from the dynamic behavior of the mutant receptors. Furthermore, it is not understood how the mutations confer thermostability. Since these details are difficult to obtain from experiments, we have used atomic level simulations to elucidate the dynamic behavior of the agonist and antagonist bound mutants as well the wild type A(2A)R. We found that significant enthalpic contribution leads to stabilization of both the inactive state (StaR2) and active-like state (GL31) thermostable mutants of A(2A)R. Stabilization resulting from mutations of bulky residues to alanine is due to the formation of interhelical hydrogen bonds and van der Waals packing that improves the transmembrane domain packing. The thermostable mutant GL31 shows less movement of the transmembrane helix TM6 with respect to TM3 than the wild type receptor. While restricted dynamics of GL31 is advantageous in its purification and crystallization, it could also be the reason why these mutants are not efficient in activating the G proteins. We observed that the calculated stress on each residue is higher in the wild type receptor compared to the thermostable mutants, and this stress is required for activation to occur. Thus, reduced dynamic behavior of the thermostable mutants leading to lowered activation of these receptors originates from reduced stress on each residue. Finally, accurate calculation of the change in free energy for single mutations shows good correlation with the change in the measured thermostability. These results provide insights into the effect of mutations that can be incorporated in deriving thermostable mutants for other GPCRs. American Chemical Society 2014-02-28 2014-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3983344/ /pubmed/24579769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp411618h Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
spellingShingle Lee, Sangbae
Bhattacharya, Supriyo
Grisshammer, Reinhard
Tate, Christopher
Vaidehi, Nagarajan
Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor
title Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor
title_full Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor
title_fullStr Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor
title_short Dynamic Behavior of the Active and Inactive States of the Adenosine A(2A) Receptor
title_sort dynamic behavior of the active and inactive states of the adenosine a(2a) receptor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24579769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp411618h
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangbae dynamicbehavioroftheactiveandinactivestatesoftheadenosinea2areceptor
AT bhattacharyasupriyo dynamicbehavioroftheactiveandinactivestatesoftheadenosinea2areceptor
AT grisshammerreinhard dynamicbehavioroftheactiveandinactivestatesoftheadenosinea2areceptor
AT tatechristopher dynamicbehavioroftheactiveandinactivestatesoftheadenosinea2areceptor
AT vaidehinagarajan dynamicbehavioroftheactiveandinactivestatesoftheadenosinea2areceptor