Cargando…
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results
INTRODUCTION: Rectum-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established treatment for T1 rectal cancer (RC). However, it is associated with an increased rate of local recurrence in comparison with extended resection. In most cases this failure is linked to inappropriate case selec...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.40384 |
_version_ | 1782311341907771392 |
---|---|
author | Wałęga, Piotr Kenig, Jakub Richter, Piotr |
author_facet | Wałęga, Piotr Kenig, Jakub Richter, Piotr |
author_sort | Wałęga, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Rectum-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established treatment for T1 rectal cancer (RC). However, it is associated with an increased rate of local recurrence in comparison with extended resection. In most cases this failure is linked to inappropriate case selection and the presence of clinically non-detectable metastases in the regional lymph nodes. Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection (EPMR) makes it possible to remove the relevant lymphatic drainage of the lower third of the rectum in a minimally invasive way, which in turn can help in adequate tumor staging. AIM: To evaluate the long-term clinical results and influence of combined TEM and EPMR treatment on the anorectal functions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with T1 RC were operated on using TEM and EPMR as a two-stage procedure between 2007 and 2009. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 42.6 (range: 36–80) months, none of our patients complained of symptoms of incontinence apart from one female patient with gas incontinence diagnosed preoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in basal anal pressure, squeeze anal pressure, high pressure zone length or fecal continence assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index before and in follow-up months after the procedure. Postoperative morbidity consisted of one hematoma formation and one male patient complaining about sexual dysfunction until 6 months postoperatively. There was no evidence of locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection in combination with TEM appears to be safe, feasible and with no impact on the basic anorectal functions in the 3-year follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3983548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39835482014-04-11 Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results Wałęga, Piotr Kenig, Jakub Richter, Piotr Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Rectum-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established treatment for T1 rectal cancer (RC). However, it is associated with an increased rate of local recurrence in comparison with extended resection. In most cases this failure is linked to inappropriate case selection and the presence of clinically non-detectable metastases in the regional lymph nodes. Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection (EPMR) makes it possible to remove the relevant lymphatic drainage of the lower third of the rectum in a minimally invasive way, which in turn can help in adequate tumor staging. AIM: To evaluate the long-term clinical results and influence of combined TEM and EPMR treatment on the anorectal functions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with T1 RC were operated on using TEM and EPMR as a two-stage procedure between 2007 and 2009. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 42.6 (range: 36–80) months, none of our patients complained of symptoms of incontinence apart from one female patient with gas incontinence diagnosed preoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in basal anal pressure, squeeze anal pressure, high pressure zone length or fecal continence assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index before and in follow-up months after the procedure. Postoperative morbidity consisted of one hematoma formation and one male patient complaining about sexual dysfunction until 6 months postoperatively. There was no evidence of locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection in combination with TEM appears to be safe, feasible and with no impact on the basic anorectal functions in the 3-year follow-up. Termedia Publishing House 2014-01-30 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3983548/ /pubmed/24729808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.40384 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Wałęga, Piotr Kenig, Jakub Richter, Piotr Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results |
title | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results |
title_full | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results |
title_fullStr | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results |
title_full_unstemmed | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results |
title_short | Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results |
title_sort | transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with t1 rectal cancer – 3-year results |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.40384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wałegapiotr transanalendoscopicmicrosurgerycombinedwithendoscopicposteriormesorectumresectioninthetreatmentofpatientswitht1rectalcancer3yearresults AT kenigjakub transanalendoscopicmicrosurgerycombinedwithendoscopicposteriormesorectumresectioninthetreatmentofpatientswitht1rectalcancer3yearresults AT richterpiotr transanalendoscopicmicrosurgerycombinedwithendoscopicposteriormesorectumresectioninthetreatmentofpatientswitht1rectalcancer3yearresults |