All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with full-thickness small to large sized tears undergoing all-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair. METHOD: A literature search for electronic databases and references for eligible studies was conducted thro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Liancheng, Fu, Dong, Chen, Kai, Cai, Zhengdong, Li, Guodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24728326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094421
_version_ 1782311414452453376
author Shan, Liancheng
Fu, Dong
Chen, Kai
Cai, Zhengdong
Li, Guodong
author_facet Shan, Liancheng
Fu, Dong
Chen, Kai
Cai, Zhengdong
Li, Guodong
author_sort Shan, Liancheng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with full-thickness small to large sized tears undergoing all-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair. METHOD: A literature search for electronic databases and references for eligible studies was conducted through Medline, Embase and Cochrane library between 1969 and 2013. RESULTS: A total of 12 comparative studies (n = 770 patients) were included. Pooled results showed: there were no differences in function outcome, pain scores, retear rate or the incidence of adhesive capsulitis between all arthroscopic and mini-open repair groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in outcomes between the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair techniques, they should be considered alternative treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Meta analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3984182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39841822014-04-15 All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Shan, Liancheng Fu, Dong Chen, Kai Cai, Zhengdong Li, Guodong PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with full-thickness small to large sized tears undergoing all-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair. METHOD: A literature search for electronic databases and references for eligible studies was conducted through Medline, Embase and Cochrane library between 1969 and 2013. RESULTS: A total of 12 comparative studies (n = 770 patients) were included. Pooled results showed: there were no differences in function outcome, pain scores, retear rate or the incidence of adhesive capsulitis between all arthroscopic and mini-open repair groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in outcomes between the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair techniques, they should be considered alternative treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Meta analysis. Public Library of Science 2014-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3984182/ /pubmed/24728326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094421 Text en © 2014 Shan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shan, Liancheng
Fu, Dong
Chen, Kai
Cai, Zhengdong
Li, Guodong
All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
title All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
title_full All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
title_short All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
title_sort all-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of small to large sized rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24728326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094421
work_keys_str_mv AT shanliancheng allarthroscopicversusminiopenrepairofsmalltolargesizedrotatorcufftearsametaanalysisofclinicaloutcomes
AT fudong allarthroscopicversusminiopenrepairofsmalltolargesizedrotatorcufftearsametaanalysisofclinicaloutcomes
AT chenkai allarthroscopicversusminiopenrepairofsmalltolargesizedrotatorcufftearsametaanalysisofclinicaloutcomes
AT caizhengdong allarthroscopicversusminiopenrepairofsmalltolargesizedrotatorcufftearsametaanalysisofclinicaloutcomes
AT liguodong allarthroscopicversusminiopenrepairofsmalltolargesizedrotatorcufftearsametaanalysisofclinicaloutcomes

Ejemplares similares