Cargando…
Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy
Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocket environment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissue reattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21986651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006 |
_version_ | 1782311416726814720 |
---|---|
author | do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo HIRATA, Fabiana RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar PASSANEZI, Euloir |
author_facet | do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo HIRATA, Fabiana RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar PASSANEZI, Euloir |
author_sort | do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocket environment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissue reattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots. OBJECTIVE: This study compared four commonly used demineralizing agents for their capacity of removing smear layer and opening dentin tubules. METHODS: Fifty fragments of human dental roots previously exposed to periodontal disease were scaled and randomly divided into the following groups of treatment: 1) CA: demineralization with citric acid for 3 min; 2) TC-HCl: demineralization with tetracycline-HCl for 3 min; 3) EDTA: demineralization with EDTA for 3 min; 4) PA: demineralization with 37% phosphoric acid for 3 min; 5)Control: rubbing of saline solution for 3 min. Scanning electron microscopy was used to check for the presence of residual smear layer and for measuring the number and area of exposed dentin tubules. RESULTS: Smear layer was present in 100% of the specimens from the groups PA and control; in 80% from EDTA group; in 33.3% from TC-HCl group and 0% from CA group. The mean numbers of exposed dentin tubules in a standardized area were: TC-HCl=43.8±25.2; CA=39.3±37; PA=12.1±16.3; EDTA=4.4±7.5 and Control=2.3±5.7. The comparison showed significant differences between the following pairs of groups: TC-HCl and Control; TC-HCl and EDTA; CA and Control; and CA and EDTA. The mean percentages of area occupied by exposed dentin tubules were: CA=0.12±0.17%; TC-HCl=0.08±0.06%; PA=0.03±0.05%; EDTA=0.01±0.01% and Control=0±0%. The CA group differed significantly from the others except for the TC-HCl group. CONCLUSION: There was a decreasing ability for smear layer removal and dentin tubule widening as follows: AC>TC-HCl>PA>EDTA. This information can be of value as an extra parameter for choosing one of them for root conditioning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3984192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39841922014-04-14 Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo HIRATA, Fabiana RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar PASSANEZI, Euloir J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocket environment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissue reattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots. OBJECTIVE: This study compared four commonly used demineralizing agents for their capacity of removing smear layer and opening dentin tubules. METHODS: Fifty fragments of human dental roots previously exposed to periodontal disease were scaled and randomly divided into the following groups of treatment: 1) CA: demineralization with citric acid for 3 min; 2) TC-HCl: demineralization with tetracycline-HCl for 3 min; 3) EDTA: demineralization with EDTA for 3 min; 4) PA: demineralization with 37% phosphoric acid for 3 min; 5)Control: rubbing of saline solution for 3 min. Scanning electron microscopy was used to check for the presence of residual smear layer and for measuring the number and area of exposed dentin tubules. RESULTS: Smear layer was present in 100% of the specimens from the groups PA and control; in 80% from EDTA group; in 33.3% from TC-HCl group and 0% from CA group. The mean numbers of exposed dentin tubules in a standardized area were: TC-HCl=43.8±25.2; CA=39.3±37; PA=12.1±16.3; EDTA=4.4±7.5 and Control=2.3±5.7. The comparison showed significant differences between the following pairs of groups: TC-HCl and Control; TC-HCl and EDTA; CA and Control; and CA and EDTA. The mean percentages of area occupied by exposed dentin tubules were: CA=0.12±0.17%; TC-HCl=0.08±0.06%; PA=0.03±0.05%; EDTA=0.01±0.01% and Control=0±0%. The CA group differed significantly from the others except for the TC-HCl group. CONCLUSION: There was a decreasing ability for smear layer removal and dentin tubule widening as follows: AC>TC-HCl>PA>EDTA. This information can be of value as an extra parameter for choosing one of them for root conditioning. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3984192/ /pubmed/21986651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo HIRATA, Fabiana RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar PASSANEZI, Euloir Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy |
title | Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root
conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy |
title_full | Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root
conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy |
title_fullStr | Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root
conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root
conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy |
title_short | Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root
conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy |
title_sort | comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root
conditioning. a scanning electron microscopy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21986651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doamaralnathaliagodoy comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy AT derezendemarialuciarubo comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy AT hiratafabiana comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy AT rodriguesmarcusgustavosilva comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy AT santanaadrianacampospassanezi comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy AT greghisebastiaoluizaguiar comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy AT passanezieuloir comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy |