Cargando…

Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy

Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocket environment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissue reattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy, de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo, HIRATA, Fabiana, RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva, SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi, GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar, PASSANEZI, Euloir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21986651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006
_version_ 1782311416726814720
author do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy
de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo
HIRATA, Fabiana
RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva
SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi
GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar
PASSANEZI, Euloir
author_facet do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy
de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo
HIRATA, Fabiana
RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva
SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi
GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar
PASSANEZI, Euloir
author_sort do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy
collection PubMed
description Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocket environment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissue reattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots. OBJECTIVE: This study compared four commonly used demineralizing agents for their capacity of removing smear layer and opening dentin tubules. METHODS: Fifty fragments of human dental roots previously exposed to periodontal disease were scaled and randomly divided into the following groups of treatment: 1) CA: demineralization with citric acid for 3 min; 2) TC-HCl: demineralization with tetracycline-HCl for 3 min; 3) EDTA: demineralization with EDTA for 3 min; 4) PA: demineralization with 37% phosphoric acid for 3 min; 5)Control: rubbing of saline solution for 3 min. Scanning electron microscopy was used to check for the presence of residual smear layer and for measuring the number and area of exposed dentin tubules. RESULTS: Smear layer was present in 100% of the specimens from the groups PA and control; in 80% from EDTA group; in 33.3% from TC-HCl group and 0% from CA group. The mean numbers of exposed dentin tubules in a standardized area were: TC-HCl=43.8±25.2; CA=39.3±37; PA=12.1±16.3; EDTA=4.4±7.5 and Control=2.3±5.7. The comparison showed significant differences between the following pairs of groups: TC-HCl and Control; TC-HCl and EDTA; CA and Control; and CA and EDTA. The mean percentages of area occupied by exposed dentin tubules were: CA=0.12±0.17%; TC-HCl=0.08±0.06%; PA=0.03±0.05%; EDTA=0.01±0.01% and Control=0±0%. The CA group differed significantly from the others except for the TC-HCl group. CONCLUSION: There was a decreasing ability for smear layer removal and dentin tubule widening as follows: AC>TC-HCl>PA>EDTA. This information can be of value as an extra parameter for choosing one of them for root conditioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3984192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39841922014-04-14 Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo HIRATA, Fabiana RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar PASSANEZI, Euloir J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocket environment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissue reattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots. OBJECTIVE: This study compared four commonly used demineralizing agents for their capacity of removing smear layer and opening dentin tubules. METHODS: Fifty fragments of human dental roots previously exposed to periodontal disease were scaled and randomly divided into the following groups of treatment: 1) CA: demineralization with citric acid for 3 min; 2) TC-HCl: demineralization with tetracycline-HCl for 3 min; 3) EDTA: demineralization with EDTA for 3 min; 4) PA: demineralization with 37% phosphoric acid for 3 min; 5)Control: rubbing of saline solution for 3 min. Scanning electron microscopy was used to check for the presence of residual smear layer and for measuring the number and area of exposed dentin tubules. RESULTS: Smear layer was present in 100% of the specimens from the groups PA and control; in 80% from EDTA group; in 33.3% from TC-HCl group and 0% from CA group. The mean numbers of exposed dentin tubules in a standardized area were: TC-HCl=43.8±25.2; CA=39.3±37; PA=12.1±16.3; EDTA=4.4±7.5 and Control=2.3±5.7. The comparison showed significant differences between the following pairs of groups: TC-HCl and Control; TC-HCl and EDTA; CA and Control; and CA and EDTA. The mean percentages of area occupied by exposed dentin tubules were: CA=0.12±0.17%; TC-HCl=0.08±0.06%; PA=0.03±0.05%; EDTA=0.01±0.01% and Control=0±0%. The CA group differed significantly from the others except for the TC-HCl group. CONCLUSION: There was a decreasing ability for smear layer removal and dentin tubule widening as follows: AC>TC-HCl>PA>EDTA. This information can be of value as an extra parameter for choosing one of them for root conditioning. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3984192/ /pubmed/21986651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
do AMARAL, Nathalia Godoy
de REZENDE, Maria Lúcia Rubo
HIRATA, Fabiana
RODRIGUES, Marcus Gustavo Silva
SANT'ANA, Adriana Campos Passanezi
GREGHI, Sebastião Luiz Aguiar
PASSANEZI, Euloir
Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy
title Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy
title_full Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy
title_fullStr Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy
title_short Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy
title_sort comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. a scanning electron microscopy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21986651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006
work_keys_str_mv AT doamaralnathaliagodoy comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy
AT derezendemarialuciarubo comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy
AT hiratafabiana comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy
AT rodriguesmarcusgustavosilva comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy
AT santanaadrianacampospassanezi comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy
AT greghisebastiaoluizaguiar comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy
AT passanezieuloir comparisonamongfourcommonlyuseddemineralizingagentsforrootconditioningascanningelectronmicroscopy