Cargando…

Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is not yet unanimously considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of acute appendicitis because of its higher operative time, intra-abdominal abscess risk, and costs compared to open appendectomy. This study aimed to compare outcomes and cost of laparoscopi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minutolo, Vincenzo, Licciardello, Alessio, Di Stefano, Biagio, Arena, Manuel, Arena, Goffredo, Antonacci, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24646120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-14
_version_ 1782311449947799552
author Minutolo, Vincenzo
Licciardello, Alessio
Di Stefano, Biagio
Arena, Manuel
Arena, Goffredo
Antonacci, Vincenzo
author_facet Minutolo, Vincenzo
Licciardello, Alessio
Di Stefano, Biagio
Arena, Manuel
Arena, Goffredo
Antonacci, Vincenzo
author_sort Minutolo, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is not yet unanimously considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of acute appendicitis because of its higher operative time, intra-abdominal abscess risk, and costs compared to open appendectomy. This study aimed to compare outcomes and cost of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a district hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 230 patients who underwent appendectomy at the Division of General Surgery of the Civil Hospital of Ragusa, Italy, from May 2008 to May 2012 was performed. The variables analyzed included patients data (age, gender, previous abdominal surgery, preoperative WBC count, duration of symptoms, ASA risk score), rate of uncomplicated or complicated appendicitis, operative time, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and total costs. The patients were divided in two groups according to the surgical approach and compared for each variable. The results were analyzed using the t Student test for quantitative variables, and the Chi-square test with Yates correction and Fisher exact test for categorical. RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 139 patients, open appendectomy in 91. Two cases (1.4%) were converted to open procedure and included in the laparoscopic group data. Patient data and rate of complicated appendicitis were similar in the two study groups. There was no statistical difference (p = 0.476) in the mean operative time between the laparoscopic (52.2 min; range, 20–155) and open appendectomy (49.3 min; range, 20–110) groups. The overall incidence of minor and major complications was significantly lower (p = 0.006) after laparoscopic appendectomy (2.9%, 4 cases) than after open appendectomy (13.2%, 12 cases); rate of intra-abdominal abscess were similar. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (p = 0.001) in laparoscopic group (2.75 days; range, 1–8) than in open group (3.87 days; range, 1–19). The mean total cost was 2282 Euro in laparoscopic group and 2337 Euro in open group, with a no significant difference of 55 Euro (p = 0.812). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, and similar operative time, intra-abdominal abscess rate, and total costs, compared with open appendectomy. Therefore, laparoscopic appendectomy can be recommended as preferred approach in acute appendicitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3984427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39844272014-04-13 Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital Minutolo, Vincenzo Licciardello, Alessio Di Stefano, Biagio Arena, Manuel Arena, Goffredo Antonacci, Vincenzo BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is not yet unanimously considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of acute appendicitis because of its higher operative time, intra-abdominal abscess risk, and costs compared to open appendectomy. This study aimed to compare outcomes and cost of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a district hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 230 patients who underwent appendectomy at the Division of General Surgery of the Civil Hospital of Ragusa, Italy, from May 2008 to May 2012 was performed. The variables analyzed included patients data (age, gender, previous abdominal surgery, preoperative WBC count, duration of symptoms, ASA risk score), rate of uncomplicated or complicated appendicitis, operative time, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and total costs. The patients were divided in two groups according to the surgical approach and compared for each variable. The results were analyzed using the t Student test for quantitative variables, and the Chi-square test with Yates correction and Fisher exact test for categorical. RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 139 patients, open appendectomy in 91. Two cases (1.4%) were converted to open procedure and included in the laparoscopic group data. Patient data and rate of complicated appendicitis were similar in the two study groups. There was no statistical difference (p = 0.476) in the mean operative time between the laparoscopic (52.2 min; range, 20–155) and open appendectomy (49.3 min; range, 20–110) groups. The overall incidence of minor and major complications was significantly lower (p = 0.006) after laparoscopic appendectomy (2.9%, 4 cases) than after open appendectomy (13.2%, 12 cases); rate of intra-abdominal abscess were similar. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (p = 0.001) in laparoscopic group (2.75 days; range, 1–8) than in open group (3.87 days; range, 1–19). The mean total cost was 2282 Euro in laparoscopic group and 2337 Euro in open group, with a no significant difference of 55 Euro (p = 0.812). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, and similar operative time, intra-abdominal abscess rate, and total costs, compared with open appendectomy. Therefore, laparoscopic appendectomy can be recommended as preferred approach in acute appendicitis. BioMed Central 2014-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3984427/ /pubmed/24646120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-14 Text en Copyright © 2014 Minutolo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Minutolo, Vincenzo
Licciardello, Alessio
Di Stefano, Biagio
Arena, Manuel
Arena, Goffredo
Antonacci, Vincenzo
Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
title Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
title_full Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
title_fullStr Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
title_short Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
title_sort outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24646120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-14
work_keys_str_mv AT minutolovincenzo outcomesandcostanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyfortreatmentofacuteappendicitis4yearsexperienceinadistricthospital
AT licciardelloalessio outcomesandcostanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyfortreatmentofacuteappendicitis4yearsexperienceinadistricthospital
AT distefanobiagio outcomesandcostanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyfortreatmentofacuteappendicitis4yearsexperienceinadistricthospital
AT arenamanuel outcomesandcostanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyfortreatmentofacuteappendicitis4yearsexperienceinadistricthospital
AT arenagoffredo outcomesandcostanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyfortreatmentofacuteappendicitis4yearsexperienceinadistricthospital
AT antonaccivincenzo outcomesandcostanalysisoflaparoscopicversusopenappendectomyfortreatmentofacuteappendicitis4yearsexperienceinadistricthospital