Cargando…

Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions

The spatial extent of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is of paramount interest for all studies employing this method. It is generally assumed that the induced electric field is the crucial parameter to determine which cortical regions are excited. While it is difficult to directly measure th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Opitz, Alexander, Zafar, Noman, Bockermann, Volker, Rohde, Veit, Paulus, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24818076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.004
_version_ 1782311452664659968
author Opitz, Alexander
Zafar, Noman
Bockermann, Volker
Rohde, Veit
Paulus, Walter
author_facet Opitz, Alexander
Zafar, Noman
Bockermann, Volker
Rohde, Veit
Paulus, Walter
author_sort Opitz, Alexander
collection PubMed
description The spatial extent of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is of paramount interest for all studies employing this method. It is generally assumed that the induced electric field is the crucial parameter to determine which cortical regions are excited. While it is difficult to directly measure the electric field, one usually relies on computational models to estimate the electric field distribution. Direct electrical stimulation (DES) is a local brain stimulation method generally considered the gold standard to map structure–function relationships in the brain. Its application is typically limited to patients undergoing brain surgery. In this study we compare the computationally predicted stimulation area in TMS with the DES area in six patients with tumors near precentral regions. We combine a motor evoked potential (MEP) mapping experiment for both TMS and DES with realistic individual finite element method (FEM) simulations of the electric field distribution during TMS and DES. On average, stimulation areas in TMS and DES show an overlap of up to 80%, thus validating our computational physiology approach to estimate TMS excitation volumes. Our results can help in understanding the spatial spread of TMS effects and in optimizing stimulation protocols to more specifically target certain cortical regions based on computational modeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3984442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39844422014-05-09 Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions Opitz, Alexander Zafar, Noman Bockermann, Volker Rohde, Veit Paulus, Walter Neuroimage Clin Regular Articles The spatial extent of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is of paramount interest for all studies employing this method. It is generally assumed that the induced electric field is the crucial parameter to determine which cortical regions are excited. While it is difficult to directly measure the electric field, one usually relies on computational models to estimate the electric field distribution. Direct electrical stimulation (DES) is a local brain stimulation method generally considered the gold standard to map structure–function relationships in the brain. Its application is typically limited to patients undergoing brain surgery. In this study we compare the computationally predicted stimulation area in TMS with the DES area in six patients with tumors near precentral regions. We combine a motor evoked potential (MEP) mapping experiment for both TMS and DES with realistic individual finite element method (FEM) simulations of the electric field distribution during TMS and DES. On average, stimulation areas in TMS and DES show an overlap of up to 80%, thus validating our computational physiology approach to estimate TMS excitation volumes. Our results can help in understanding the spatial spread of TMS effects and in optimizing stimulation protocols to more specifically target certain cortical regions based on computational modeling. Elsevier 2014-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3984442/ /pubmed/24818076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.004 Text en © 2014 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Opitz, Alexander
Zafar, Noman
Bockermann, Volker
Rohde, Veit
Paulus, Walter
Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions
title Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions
title_full Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions
title_fullStr Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions
title_full_unstemmed Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions
title_short Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions
title_sort validating computationally predicted tms stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24818076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.004
work_keys_str_mv AT opitzalexander validatingcomputationallypredictedtmsstimulationareasusingdirectelectricalstimulationinpatientswithbraintumorsnearprecentralregions
AT zafarnoman validatingcomputationallypredictedtmsstimulationareasusingdirectelectricalstimulationinpatientswithbraintumorsnearprecentralregions
AT bockermannvolker validatingcomputationallypredictedtmsstimulationareasusingdirectelectricalstimulationinpatientswithbraintumorsnearprecentralregions
AT rohdeveit validatingcomputationallypredictedtmsstimulationareasusingdirectelectricalstimulationinpatientswithbraintumorsnearprecentralregions
AT pauluswalter validatingcomputationallypredictedtmsstimulationareasusingdirectelectricalstimulationinpatientswithbraintumorsnearprecentralregions