Cargando…
Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses --Part 2: methods for improving interpretability for decision-makers
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials that include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) often provide crucial information for patients, clinicians and policy-makers facing challenging health care decisions. Based on emerging methods, guidance on improving the interpretability of meta...
Autores principales: | Johnston, Bradley C, Patrick, Donald L, Thorlund, Kristian, Busse, Jason W, da Costa, Bruno R, Schünemann, Holger J, Guyatt, Gordon H |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-211 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses – Part 1: assessing risk of bias and combining outcomes
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: The clinician's perspective
por: Schünemann, Holger J, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure
por: Brożek, Jan L, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Combining scores from different patient reported outcome measures in meta-analyses: when is it justified?
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2006)