Cargando…

Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the hospital emergency department. Of these, over 40% are considered unstable and require some form of fixation. In recent years with the advent of low profile plating, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Couzens, Gregory B, Peters, Susan E, Cutbush, Kenneth, Hope, Benjamin, Taylor, Fraser, James, Christopher D, Rankin, Carly R, Ross, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-74
_version_ 1782311474731941888
author Couzens, Gregory B
Peters, Susan E
Cutbush, Kenneth
Hope, Benjamin
Taylor, Fraser
James, Christopher D
Rankin, Carly R
Ross, Mark
author_facet Couzens, Gregory B
Peters, Susan E
Cutbush, Kenneth
Hope, Benjamin
Taylor, Fraser
James, Christopher D
Rankin, Carly R
Ross, Mark
author_sort Couzens, Gregory B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the hospital emergency department. Of these, over 40% are considered unstable and require some form of fixation. In recent years with the advent of low profile plating, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using volar plates has become the surgical treatment of choice in many hospitals. However, it is currently unknown which plating system has the lowest complication rate and/or superior clinical and radiological outcomes following surgery. Few studies have compared different types of plates, which may have various features, different plate and screw designs or may be manufactured from different materials (for example, stainless steel or titanium). This study will specifically investigate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and complication rates of two commonly used volar plating systems for fixation of distal radius fractures: one made from stainless steel (Trimed™ Volar Plate, Trimed™, California, USA) and the other made from titanium (Medartis® Aptus Volar Plate, Medartis®, Basel, Switzerland). The primary aim of this study is to determine if there is a difference on the Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation six months following ORIF using a volar plate for adult patients with a distal radius fracture. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will implement a randomized prospective clinical trial study design evaluating the outcomes of two different types of volar plates: one plate manufactured from stainless steel (Trimed™ Volar Plate) and one plate manufactured from titanium (Medartis® Aptus Volar Plate). The surgery will be performed at a major trauma hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Outcome measures including function, adverse events, range of movement, strength, disability, radiological findings and health-related quality of life will be collected at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months following surgery. A parallel economic analysis will also be performed. This randomized clinical trial is due to deliver results in December 2016. DISCUSSION: Results from this trial will contribute to the evidence on operative management of distal radius fractures and plate material type. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612000969864
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3984716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39847162014-04-14 Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial Couzens, Gregory B Peters, Susan E Cutbush, Kenneth Hope, Benjamin Taylor, Fraser James, Christopher D Rankin, Carly R Ross, Mark BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the hospital emergency department. Of these, over 40% are considered unstable and require some form of fixation. In recent years with the advent of low profile plating, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using volar plates has become the surgical treatment of choice in many hospitals. However, it is currently unknown which plating system has the lowest complication rate and/or superior clinical and radiological outcomes following surgery. Few studies have compared different types of plates, which may have various features, different plate and screw designs or may be manufactured from different materials (for example, stainless steel or titanium). This study will specifically investigate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and complication rates of two commonly used volar plating systems for fixation of distal radius fractures: one made from stainless steel (Trimed™ Volar Plate, Trimed™, California, USA) and the other made from titanium (Medartis® Aptus Volar Plate, Medartis®, Basel, Switzerland). The primary aim of this study is to determine if there is a difference on the Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation six months following ORIF using a volar plate for adult patients with a distal radius fracture. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will implement a randomized prospective clinical trial study design evaluating the outcomes of two different types of volar plates: one plate manufactured from stainless steel (Trimed™ Volar Plate) and one plate manufactured from titanium (Medartis® Aptus Volar Plate). The surgery will be performed at a major trauma hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Outcome measures including function, adverse events, range of movement, strength, disability, radiological findings and health-related quality of life will be collected at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months following surgery. A parallel economic analysis will also be performed. This randomized clinical trial is due to deliver results in December 2016. DISCUSSION: Results from this trial will contribute to the evidence on operative management of distal radius fractures and plate material type. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612000969864 BioMed Central 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3984716/ /pubmed/24612524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-74 Text en Copyright © 2014 Couzens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Couzens, Gregory B
Peters, Susan E
Cutbush, Kenneth
Hope, Benjamin
Taylor, Fraser
James, Christopher D
Rankin, Carly R
Ross, Mark
Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial
title Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial
title_full Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial
title_short Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial
title_sort stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-74
work_keys_str_mv AT couzensgregoryb stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT peterssusane stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT cutbushkenneth stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT hopebenjamin stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT taylorfraser stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT jameschristopherd stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT rankincarlyr stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT rossmark stainlesssteelversustitaniumvolarmultiaxiallockingplatesforfixationofdistalradiusfracturesarandomisedclinicaltrial