Cargando…
Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
Modified Hodge Test (MHT) has been suggested as screening tests for carbapenemases, but concerns regarding its difficult interpretation and common false-positive results obtained in the presence of other β-lactamases have been noted. This study aimed to quantify the enhanced growth formed by the ind...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/139305 |
_version_ | 1782311496463679488 |
---|---|
author | Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla Zavascki, Alexandre P. Barth, Afonso Luis |
author_facet | Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla Zavascki, Alexandre P. Barth, Afonso Luis |
author_sort | Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modified Hodge Test (MHT) has been suggested as screening tests for carbapenemases, but concerns regarding its difficult interpretation and common false-positive results obtained in the presence of other β-lactamases have been noted. This study aimed to quantify the enhanced growth formed by the indicator strain and thus evaluate the performance of a quantitative interpretation of MHT for KPC screening. MHT was performed in 50 KPC-producing isolates and 334 non-carbapenemase-producing isolates, using ertapenem (ETP) and meropenem (MEM) as substrates. The size of enhanced growth of indicator strain was measured for each isolate tested and for the positive control used, and a ratio was calculated. Our results revealed 17 different ETP and MEM ratios, with distinct sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP). Higher SN combined to higher SP was achieved when ETP and MEM ratios were 0.45, with a SN value of 96% for both substrates and SP values of 99.4% and 100% for ETP and MEM, respectively. The quantification with both substrates increased SP of the test for KPC detection. Considering that MHT is the unique phenotypic test that is referred to by CLSI, a more accurate approach for its interpretation could be applied to make it a more useful tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3984814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39848142014-04-30 Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla Zavascki, Alexandre P. Barth, Afonso Luis Biomed Res Int Research Article Modified Hodge Test (MHT) has been suggested as screening tests for carbapenemases, but concerns regarding its difficult interpretation and common false-positive results obtained in the presence of other β-lactamases have been noted. This study aimed to quantify the enhanced growth formed by the indicator strain and thus evaluate the performance of a quantitative interpretation of MHT for KPC screening. MHT was performed in 50 KPC-producing isolates and 334 non-carbapenemase-producing isolates, using ertapenem (ETP) and meropenem (MEM) as substrates. The size of enhanced growth of indicator strain was measured for each isolate tested and for the positive control used, and a ratio was calculated. Our results revealed 17 different ETP and MEM ratios, with distinct sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP). Higher SN combined to higher SP was achieved when ETP and MEM ratios were 0.45, with a SN value of 96% for both substrates and SP values of 99.4% and 100% for ETP and MEM, respectively. The quantification with both substrates increased SP of the test for KPC detection. Considering that MHT is the unique phenotypic test that is referred to by CLSI, a more accurate approach for its interpretation could be applied to make it a more useful tool. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3984814/ /pubmed/24790988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/139305 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vanessa Bley Ribeiro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla Zavascki, Alexandre P. Barth, Afonso Luis Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates |
title | Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates |
title_full | Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates |
title_fullStr | Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates |
title_short | Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates |
title_sort | performance of quantification of modified hodge test: an evaluation with klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae isolates |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/139305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribeirovanessabley performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates AT linharesadrianorostirolla performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates AT zavasckialexandrep performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates AT barthafonsoluis performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates |