Cargando…

Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates

Modified Hodge Test (MHT) has been suggested as screening tests for carbapenemases, but concerns regarding its difficult interpretation and common false-positive results obtained in the presence of other β-lactamases have been noted. This study aimed to quantify the enhanced growth formed by the ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley, Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla, Zavascki, Alexandre P., Barth, Afonso Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/139305
_version_ 1782311496463679488
author Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley
Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla
Zavascki, Alexandre P.
Barth, Afonso Luis
author_facet Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley
Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla
Zavascki, Alexandre P.
Barth, Afonso Luis
author_sort Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley
collection PubMed
description Modified Hodge Test (MHT) has been suggested as screening tests for carbapenemases, but concerns regarding its difficult interpretation and common false-positive results obtained in the presence of other β-lactamases have been noted. This study aimed to quantify the enhanced growth formed by the indicator strain and thus evaluate the performance of a quantitative interpretation of MHT for KPC screening. MHT was performed in 50 KPC-producing isolates and 334 non-carbapenemase-producing isolates, using ertapenem (ETP) and meropenem (MEM) as substrates. The size of enhanced growth of indicator strain was measured for each isolate tested and for the positive control used, and a ratio was calculated. Our results revealed 17 different ETP and MEM ratios, with distinct sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP). Higher SN combined to higher SP was achieved when ETP and MEM ratios were 0.45, with a SN value of 96% for both substrates and SP values of 99.4% and 100% for ETP and MEM, respectively. The quantification with both substrates increased SP of the test for KPC detection. Considering that MHT is the unique phenotypic test that is referred to by CLSI, a more accurate approach for its interpretation could be applied to make it a more useful tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3984814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39848142014-04-30 Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla Zavascki, Alexandre P. Barth, Afonso Luis Biomed Res Int Research Article Modified Hodge Test (MHT) has been suggested as screening tests for carbapenemases, but concerns regarding its difficult interpretation and common false-positive results obtained in the presence of other β-lactamases have been noted. This study aimed to quantify the enhanced growth formed by the indicator strain and thus evaluate the performance of a quantitative interpretation of MHT for KPC screening. MHT was performed in 50 KPC-producing isolates and 334 non-carbapenemase-producing isolates, using ertapenem (ETP) and meropenem (MEM) as substrates. The size of enhanced growth of indicator strain was measured for each isolate tested and for the positive control used, and a ratio was calculated. Our results revealed 17 different ETP and MEM ratios, with distinct sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP). Higher SN combined to higher SP was achieved when ETP and MEM ratios were 0.45, with a SN value of 96% for both substrates and SP values of 99.4% and 100% for ETP and MEM, respectively. The quantification with both substrates increased SP of the test for KPC detection. Considering that MHT is the unique phenotypic test that is referred to by CLSI, a more accurate approach for its interpretation could be applied to make it a more useful tool. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3984814/ /pubmed/24790988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/139305 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vanessa Bley Ribeiro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ribeiro, Vanessa Bley
Linhares, Adriano Rostirolla
Zavascki, Alexandre P.
Barth, Afonso Luis
Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
title Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
title_full Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
title_fullStr Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
title_short Performance of Quantification of Modified Hodge Test: An Evaluation with Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
title_sort performance of quantification of modified hodge test: an evaluation with klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae isolates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/139305
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirovanessabley performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates
AT linharesadrianorostirolla performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates
AT zavasckialexandrep performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates
AT barthafonsoluis performanceofquantificationofmodifiedhodgetestanevaluationwithklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemaseproducingenterobacteriaceaeisolates