Cargando…

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study

We want to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 140 women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayati, Sedigheh, Vahidroodsari, Fatemeh, Farshidi, Farnoosh, Shahabian, Masoud, Afzal Aghaee, Monavar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734084
_version_ 1782311548398600192
author Ayati, Sedigheh
Vahidroodsari, Fatemeh
Farshidi, Farnoosh
Shahabian, Masoud
Afzal Aghaee, Monavar
author_facet Ayati, Sedigheh
Vahidroodsari, Fatemeh
Farshidi, Farnoosh
Shahabian, Masoud
Afzal Aghaee, Monavar
author_sort Ayati, Sedigheh
collection PubMed
description We want to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 140 women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol. In first group, 25 µg misoprostol was placed in the posterior fornix of the vagina and second group received 25 µg misoprostol sublingually, every 6 hours for 24 h. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics between two groups. The main indication for cesarean section in both groups was fetal distress, followed by absence of active labor progress. Evaluation of cesarean indication was not significantly different in two groups; including fetal distress, absence of active labor, uterine over activity and failure to progress. The maternal complication in sublingual group included residual placenta (2%), tachysystole (2%), vomiting (12%), atoni (3.3%) and abdominal pain (5.5%), although there was no significant difference between two groups. Sublingual misoprostol is as effective as vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term. However, sublingual misoprostol has the advantage of easy administration and may be more suitable than vaginal misoprostol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3985259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39852592014-04-14 Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study Ayati, Sedigheh Vahidroodsari, Fatemeh Farshidi, Farnoosh Shahabian, Masoud Afzal Aghaee, Monavar Iran J Pharm Res Original Article We want to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 140 women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol. In first group, 25 µg misoprostol was placed in the posterior fornix of the vagina and second group received 25 µg misoprostol sublingually, every 6 hours for 24 h. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics between two groups. The main indication for cesarean section in both groups was fetal distress, followed by absence of active labor progress. Evaluation of cesarean indication was not significantly different in two groups; including fetal distress, absence of active labor, uterine over activity and failure to progress. The maternal complication in sublingual group included residual placenta (2%), tachysystole (2%), vomiting (12%), atoni (3.3%) and abdominal pain (5.5%), although there was no significant difference between two groups. Sublingual misoprostol is as effective as vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term. However, sublingual misoprostol has the advantage of easy administration and may be more suitable than vaginal misoprostol. Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3985259/ /pubmed/24734084 Text en © 2014 by School of Pharmacy, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ayati, Sedigheh
Vahidroodsari, Fatemeh
Farshidi, Farnoosh
Shahabian, Masoud
Afzal Aghaee, Monavar
Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
title Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
title_full Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
title_fullStr Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
title_short Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
title_sort vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for labor induction at term and post term: a randomized prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734084
work_keys_str_mv AT ayatisedigheh vaginalversussublingualmisoprostolforlaborinductionattermandposttermarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT vahidroodsarifatemeh vaginalversussublingualmisoprostolforlaborinductionattermandposttermarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT farshidifarnoosh vaginalversussublingualmisoprostolforlaborinductionattermandposttermarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT shahabianmasoud vaginalversussublingualmisoprostolforlaborinductionattermandposttermarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT afzalaghaeemonavar vaginalversussublingualmisoprostolforlaborinductionattermandposttermarandomizedprospectivestudy