Cargando…
Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India
In order to identify a quick and reliable technique for accurate diagnosis of malaria, study of the efficiency of the tests such as Parahit total (HRPII & aldolase Ag), Advantage mal card (parasite specific LDH), and modified QBC was done in comparison with conventional blood smear microscopy. O...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194651 |
_version_ | 1782311550748459008 |
---|---|
author | Kocharekar, Manali M. Sarkar, Sougat S. Dasgupta, Debjani |
author_facet | Kocharekar, Manali M. Sarkar, Sougat S. Dasgupta, Debjani |
author_sort | Kocharekar, Manali M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to identify a quick and reliable technique for accurate diagnosis of malaria, study of the efficiency of the tests such as Parahit total (HRPII & aldolase Ag), Advantage mal card (parasite specific LDH), and modified QBC was done in comparison with conventional blood smear microscopy. One hundred patients infected with P. vivax and 101 infected with P. falciparum were included in this study. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. falciparum detection was 70.3, 95%, and 98%, and specificity was 98%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. vivax detection was 73%, 97.0%, and 98%, respectively, and specificity of all the tests was 98%. On day 15, in falciparum arm, Advantage mal card and Parahit total showed 8 (7.92%) and 59 (58.41%) false positives. On day 15, in vivax arm, Parahit total revealed 52% false positives. The study indicated that modified QBC could be only used where appropriate facilities are available. Advantage mal card was a better follow-up tool than Parahit total. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3985292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39852922014-05-05 Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India Kocharekar, Manali M. Sarkar, Sougat S. Dasgupta, Debjani J Parasitol Res Research Article In order to identify a quick and reliable technique for accurate diagnosis of malaria, study of the efficiency of the tests such as Parahit total (HRPII & aldolase Ag), Advantage mal card (parasite specific LDH), and modified QBC was done in comparison with conventional blood smear microscopy. One hundred patients infected with P. vivax and 101 infected with P. falciparum were included in this study. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. falciparum detection was 70.3, 95%, and 98%, and specificity was 98%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. vivax detection was 73%, 97.0%, and 98%, respectively, and specificity of all the tests was 98%. On day 15, in falciparum arm, Advantage mal card and Parahit total showed 8 (7.92%) and 59 (58.41%) false positives. On day 15, in vivax arm, Parahit total revealed 52% false positives. The study indicated that modified QBC could be only used where appropriate facilities are available. Advantage mal card was a better follow-up tool than Parahit total. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3985292/ /pubmed/24800057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194651 Text en Copyright © 2014 Manali M. Kocharekar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kocharekar, Manali M. Sarkar, Sougat S. Dasgupta, Debjani Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India |
title | Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India |
title_full | Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India |
title_short | Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India |
title_sort | comparative study of modified quantitative buffy coat and two rapid tests in comparison with peripheral blood smear in malaria diagnosis in mumbai, india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocharekarmanalim comparativestudyofmodifiedquantitativebuffycoatandtworapidtestsincomparisonwithperipheralbloodsmearinmalariadiagnosisinmumbaiindia AT sarkarsougats comparativestudyofmodifiedquantitativebuffycoatandtworapidtestsincomparisonwithperipheralbloodsmearinmalariadiagnosisinmumbaiindia AT dasguptadebjani comparativestudyofmodifiedquantitativebuffycoatandtworapidtestsincomparisonwithperipheralbloodsmearinmalariadiagnosisinmumbaiindia |