Cargando…

Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India

In order to identify a quick and reliable technique for accurate diagnosis of malaria, study of the efficiency of the tests such as Parahit total (HRPII & aldolase Ag), Advantage mal card (parasite specific LDH), and modified QBC was done in comparison with conventional blood smear microscopy. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kocharekar, Manali M., Sarkar, Sougat S., Dasgupta, Debjani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194651
_version_ 1782311550748459008
author Kocharekar, Manali M.
Sarkar, Sougat S.
Dasgupta, Debjani
author_facet Kocharekar, Manali M.
Sarkar, Sougat S.
Dasgupta, Debjani
author_sort Kocharekar, Manali M.
collection PubMed
description In order to identify a quick and reliable technique for accurate diagnosis of malaria, study of the efficiency of the tests such as Parahit total (HRPII & aldolase Ag), Advantage mal card (parasite specific LDH), and modified QBC was done in comparison with conventional blood smear microscopy. One hundred patients infected with P. vivax and 101 infected with P. falciparum were included in this study. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. falciparum detection was 70.3, 95%, and 98%, and specificity was 98%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. vivax detection was 73%, 97.0%, and 98%, respectively, and specificity of all the tests was 98%. On day 15, in falciparum arm, Advantage mal card and Parahit total showed 8 (7.92%) and 59 (58.41%) false positives. On day 15, in vivax arm, Parahit total revealed 52% false positives. The study indicated that modified QBC could be only used where appropriate facilities are available. Advantage mal card was a better follow-up tool than Parahit total.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3985292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39852922014-05-05 Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India Kocharekar, Manali M. Sarkar, Sougat S. Dasgupta, Debjani J Parasitol Res Research Article In order to identify a quick and reliable technique for accurate diagnosis of malaria, study of the efficiency of the tests such as Parahit total (HRPII & aldolase Ag), Advantage mal card (parasite specific LDH), and modified QBC was done in comparison with conventional blood smear microscopy. One hundred patients infected with P. vivax and 101 infected with P. falciparum were included in this study. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. falciparum detection was 70.3, 95%, and 98%, and specificity was 98%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. The sensitivity of Parahit total, Advantage mal card, and modified QBC for P. vivax detection was 73%, 97.0%, and 98%, respectively, and specificity of all the tests was 98%. On day 15, in falciparum arm, Advantage mal card and Parahit total showed 8 (7.92%) and 59 (58.41%) false positives. On day 15, in vivax arm, Parahit total revealed 52% false positives. The study indicated that modified QBC could be only used where appropriate facilities are available. Advantage mal card was a better follow-up tool than Parahit total. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3985292/ /pubmed/24800057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194651 Text en Copyright © 2014 Manali M. Kocharekar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kocharekar, Manali M.
Sarkar, Sougat S.
Dasgupta, Debjani
Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India
title Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India
title_full Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India
title_short Comparative Study of Modified Quantitative Buffy Coat and Two Rapid Tests in Comparison with Peripheral Blood Smear in Malaria Diagnosis in Mumbai, India
title_sort comparative study of modified quantitative buffy coat and two rapid tests in comparison with peripheral blood smear in malaria diagnosis in mumbai, india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194651
work_keys_str_mv AT kocharekarmanalim comparativestudyofmodifiedquantitativebuffycoatandtworapidtestsincomparisonwithperipheralbloodsmearinmalariadiagnosisinmumbaiindia
AT sarkarsougats comparativestudyofmodifiedquantitativebuffycoatandtworapidtestsincomparisonwithperipheralbloodsmearinmalariadiagnosisinmumbaiindia
AT dasguptadebjani comparativestudyofmodifiedquantitativebuffycoatandtworapidtestsincomparisonwithperipheralbloodsmearinmalariadiagnosisinmumbaiindia