Cargando…

Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) are associated with greater incidence of metastases and decreased survival. Whether they can be used as prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Methods. The authors performed a meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yibaina, Yao, Xiaoping, Ge, Jie, Hu, Fulan, Zhao, Yashuang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/102736
_version_ 1782311551211929600
author Wang, Yibaina
Yao, Xiaoping
Ge, Jie
Hu, Fulan
Zhao, Yashuang
author_facet Wang, Yibaina
Yao, Xiaoping
Ge, Jie
Hu, Fulan
Zhao, Yashuang
author_sort Wang, Yibaina
collection PubMed
description Background. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) are associated with greater incidence of metastases and decreased survival. Whether they can be used as prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Methods. The authors performed a meta-analysis using the results of a literature search of databases of PubMed and EMBASE, and the references of articles included in the analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect measures. Results. Twenty studies contributed to the analysis of VEGF, of which 16 were used for overall survival (OS) and 9 for disease-free survival (DFS). High VEGF levels has a relationship with unfavorable survival (OS: HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.30–3.02; DFS: HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.26–3.49) and a 4.22-fold increase in the rate of distant metastases. Analysis was performed on 18 studies for MVD; the results showed that patients with high MVD expression in tumors appeared to have poorer overall survival (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.22–1.58) and were at a greater risk of having unfavorable clinical characteristics related to prognosis. Corresponding results were obtained from quantitative and/or qualitative analysis of clinicopathological. Conclusions. The meta-analysis demonstrates that VEGF and MVD can be used as prognostic biomarkers for CRC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3985294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39852942014-08-20 Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Yibaina Yao, Xiaoping Ge, Jie Hu, Fulan Zhao, Yashuang ScientificWorldJournal Review Article Background. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) are associated with greater incidence of metastases and decreased survival. Whether they can be used as prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Methods. The authors performed a meta-analysis using the results of a literature search of databases of PubMed and EMBASE, and the references of articles included in the analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect measures. Results. Twenty studies contributed to the analysis of VEGF, of which 16 were used for overall survival (OS) and 9 for disease-free survival (DFS). High VEGF levels has a relationship with unfavorable survival (OS: HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.30–3.02; DFS: HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.26–3.49) and a 4.22-fold increase in the rate of distant metastases. Analysis was performed on 18 studies for MVD; the results showed that patients with high MVD expression in tumors appeared to have poorer overall survival (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.22–1.58) and were at a greater risk of having unfavorable clinical characteristics related to prognosis. Corresponding results were obtained from quantitative and/or qualitative analysis of clinicopathological. Conclusions. The meta-analysis demonstrates that VEGF and MVD can be used as prognostic biomarkers for CRC patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3985294/ /pubmed/25143961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/102736 Text en Copyright © 2014 Yibaina Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wang, Yibaina
Yao, Xiaoping
Ge, Jie
Hu, Fulan
Zhao, Yashuang
Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Can Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density Be Used as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort can vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density be used as prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/102736
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyibaina canvascularendothelialgrowthfactorandmicrovesseldensitybeusedasprognosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yaoxiaoping canvascularendothelialgrowthfactorandmicrovesseldensitybeusedasprognosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gejie canvascularendothelialgrowthfactorandmicrovesseldensitybeusedasprognosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hufulan canvascularendothelialgrowthfactorandmicrovesseldensitybeusedasprognosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoyashuang canvascularendothelialgrowthfactorandmicrovesseldensitybeusedasprognosticbiomarkersforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis