Cargando…

Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters

Background. Bremsstrahlung (BS) imaging during radioembolization (RE) confirms the deposition of radiotracer in hepatic/extrahepatic tumors. The aim of this study is to demonstrate (32)P images and to optimize the imaging parameters. Materials and Methods. Thirty-nine patients with variable types of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pirayesh, Elahe, Amoui, Mahasti, Akhlaghpoor, Shahram, Tolooee, Shahnaz, Khorrami, Maryam, PoorBeigi, Hossain, Sheibani, Shahab, Assadi, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407158
_version_ 1782311568569008128
author Pirayesh, Elahe
Amoui, Mahasti
Akhlaghpoor, Shahram
Tolooee, Shahnaz
Khorrami, Maryam
PoorBeigi, Hossain
Sheibani, Shahab
Assadi, Majid
author_facet Pirayesh, Elahe
Amoui, Mahasti
Akhlaghpoor, Shahram
Tolooee, Shahnaz
Khorrami, Maryam
PoorBeigi, Hossain
Sheibani, Shahab
Assadi, Majid
author_sort Pirayesh, Elahe
collection PubMed
description Background. Bremsstrahlung (BS) imaging during radioembolization (RE) confirms the deposition of radiotracer in hepatic/extrahepatic tumors. The aim of this study is to demonstrate (32)P images and to optimize the imaging parameters. Materials and Methods. Thirty-nine patients with variable types of hepatic tumors, treated with the intra-arterial injection of (32)P, were included. All patients underwent BS SPECT imaging 24–72 h after tracer administration, using low energy high resolution (LEHR) (18 patients) or medium energy general purpose (MEGP) (21 patients) collimators. A grading scale from 1 to 4 was used to express the compatibility of the (32)P images with those obtained from CT/MRI. Results. Although the image quality obtained with the MEGP collimator was visually and quantitatively better than with the LEHR (76% concordance score versus 71%, resp.), there was no statistically significant difference between them. Conclusion. The MEGP collimator is the first choice for BS SPECT imaging. However, if the collimator change is time consuming (as in a busy center) or an MEGP collimator is not available, the LEHR collimator could be practical with acceptable images, especially in a SPECT study. In addition, BS imaging is a useful method to confirm the proper distribution of radiotherapeutic agents and has good correlation with anatomical findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3985385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39853852014-05-05 Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters Pirayesh, Elahe Amoui, Mahasti Akhlaghpoor, Shahram Tolooee, Shahnaz Khorrami, Maryam PoorBeigi, Hossain Sheibani, Shahab Assadi, Majid Radiol Res Pract Research Article Background. Bremsstrahlung (BS) imaging during radioembolization (RE) confirms the deposition of radiotracer in hepatic/extrahepatic tumors. The aim of this study is to demonstrate (32)P images and to optimize the imaging parameters. Materials and Methods. Thirty-nine patients with variable types of hepatic tumors, treated with the intra-arterial injection of (32)P, were included. All patients underwent BS SPECT imaging 24–72 h after tracer administration, using low energy high resolution (LEHR) (18 patients) or medium energy general purpose (MEGP) (21 patients) collimators. A grading scale from 1 to 4 was used to express the compatibility of the (32)P images with those obtained from CT/MRI. Results. Although the image quality obtained with the MEGP collimator was visually and quantitatively better than with the LEHR (76% concordance score versus 71%, resp.), there was no statistically significant difference between them. Conclusion. The MEGP collimator is the first choice for BS SPECT imaging. However, if the collimator change is time consuming (as in a busy center) or an MEGP collimator is not available, the LEHR collimator could be practical with acceptable images, especially in a SPECT study. In addition, BS imaging is a useful method to confirm the proper distribution of radiotherapeutic agents and has good correlation with anatomical findings. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3985385/ /pubmed/24800073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407158 Text en Copyright © 2014 Elahe Pirayesh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pirayesh, Elahe
Amoui, Mahasti
Akhlaghpoor, Shahram
Tolooee, Shahnaz
Khorrami, Maryam
PoorBeigi, Hossain
Sheibani, Shahab
Assadi, Majid
Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters
title Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters
title_full Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters
title_fullStr Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters
title_short Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters
title_sort technical considerations of phosphorous-32 bremsstrahlung spect imaging after radioembolization of hepatic tumors: a clinical assessment with a review of imaging parameters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407158
work_keys_str_mv AT pirayeshelahe technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters
AT amouimahasti technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters
AT akhlaghpoorshahram technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters
AT tolooeeshahnaz technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters
AT khorramimaryam technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters
AT poorbeigihossain technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters
AT sheibanishahab technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters
AT assadimajid technicalconsiderationsofphosphorous32bremsstrahlungspectimagingafterradioembolizationofhepatictumorsaclinicalassessmentwithareviewofimagingparameters