Cargando…

Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes

[Image: see text] The reliability of free energy simulations (FES) is limited by two factors: (a) the need for correct sampling and (b) the accuracy of the computational method employed. Classical methods (e.g., force fields) are typically used for FES and present a myriad of challenges, with parame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: König, Gerhard, Hudson, Phillip S., Boresch, Stefan, Woodcock, H. Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct401118k
_version_ 1782311633252515840
author König, Gerhard
Hudson, Phillip S.
Boresch, Stefan
Woodcock, H. Lee
author_facet König, Gerhard
Hudson, Phillip S.
Boresch, Stefan
Woodcock, H. Lee
author_sort König, Gerhard
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The reliability of free energy simulations (FES) is limited by two factors: (a) the need for correct sampling and (b) the accuracy of the computational method employed. Classical methods (e.g., force fields) are typically used for FES and present a myriad of challenges, with parametrization being a principle one. On the other hand, parameter-free quantum mechanical (QM) methods tend to be too computationally expensive for adequate sampling. One widely used approach is a combination of methods, where the free energy difference between the two end states is computed by, e.g., molecular mechanics (MM), and the end states are corrected by more accurate methods, such as QM or hybrid QM/MM techniques. Here we report two new approaches that significantly improve the aforementioned scheme; with a focus on how to compute corrections between, e.g., the MM and the more accurate QM calculations. First, a molecular dynamics trajectory that properly samples relevant conformational degrees of freedom is generated. Next, potential energies of each trajectory frame are generated with a QM or QM/MM Hamiltonian. Free energy differences are then calculated based on the QM or QM/MM energies using either a non-Boltzmann Bennett approach (QM-NBB) or non-Boltzmann free energy perturbation (NB-FEP). Both approaches are applied to calculate relative and absolute solvation free energies in explicit and implicit solvent environments. Solvation free energy differences (relative and absolute) between ethane and methanol in explicit solvent are used as the initial test case for QM-NBB. Next, implicit solvent methods are employed in conjunction with both QM-NBB and NB-FEP to compute absolute solvation free energies for 21 compounds. These compounds range from small molecules such as ethane and methanol to fairly large, flexible solutes, such as triacetyl glycerol. Several technical aspects were investigated. Ultimately some best practices are suggested for improving methods that seek to connect MM to QM (or QM/MM) levels of theory in FES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3985817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39858172015-02-11 Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes König, Gerhard Hudson, Phillip S. Boresch, Stefan Woodcock, H. Lee J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The reliability of free energy simulations (FES) is limited by two factors: (a) the need for correct sampling and (b) the accuracy of the computational method employed. Classical methods (e.g., force fields) are typically used for FES and present a myriad of challenges, with parametrization being a principle one. On the other hand, parameter-free quantum mechanical (QM) methods tend to be too computationally expensive for adequate sampling. One widely used approach is a combination of methods, where the free energy difference between the two end states is computed by, e.g., molecular mechanics (MM), and the end states are corrected by more accurate methods, such as QM or hybrid QM/MM techniques. Here we report two new approaches that significantly improve the aforementioned scheme; with a focus on how to compute corrections between, e.g., the MM and the more accurate QM calculations. First, a molecular dynamics trajectory that properly samples relevant conformational degrees of freedom is generated. Next, potential energies of each trajectory frame are generated with a QM or QM/MM Hamiltonian. Free energy differences are then calculated based on the QM or QM/MM energies using either a non-Boltzmann Bennett approach (QM-NBB) or non-Boltzmann free energy perturbation (NB-FEP). Both approaches are applied to calculate relative and absolute solvation free energies in explicit and implicit solvent environments. Solvation free energy differences (relative and absolute) between ethane and methanol in explicit solvent are used as the initial test case for QM-NBB. Next, implicit solvent methods are employed in conjunction with both QM-NBB and NB-FEP to compute absolute solvation free energies for 21 compounds. These compounds range from small molecules such as ethane and methanol to fairly large, flexible solutes, such as triacetyl glycerol. Several technical aspects were investigated. Ultimately some best practices are suggested for improving methods that seek to connect MM to QM (or QM/MM) levels of theory in FES. American Chemical Society 2014-02-11 2014-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3985817/ /pubmed/24803863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct401118k Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
spellingShingle König, Gerhard
Hudson, Phillip S.
Boresch, Stefan
Woodcock, H. Lee
Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes
title Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes
title_full Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes
title_fullStr Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes
title_full_unstemmed Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes
title_short Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes
title_sort multiscale free energy simulations: an efficient method for connecting classical md simulations to qm or qm/mm free energies using non-boltzmann bennett reweighting schemes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3985817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct401118k
work_keys_str_mv AT koniggerhard multiscalefreeenergysimulationsanefficientmethodforconnectingclassicalmdsimulationstoqmorqmmmfreeenergiesusingnonboltzmannbennettreweightingschemes
AT hudsonphillips multiscalefreeenergysimulationsanefficientmethodforconnectingclassicalmdsimulationstoqmorqmmmfreeenergiesusingnonboltzmannbennettreweightingschemes
AT boreschstefan multiscalefreeenergysimulationsanefficientmethodforconnectingclassicalmdsimulationstoqmorqmmmfreeenergiesusingnonboltzmannbennettreweightingschemes
AT woodcockhlee multiscalefreeenergysimulationsanefficientmethodforconnectingclassicalmdsimulationstoqmorqmmmfreeenergiesusingnonboltzmannbennettreweightingschemes