Cargando…
Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
OBJECTIVE: To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24748767 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735 |
_version_ | 1782311691213602816 |
---|---|
author | Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza Silva Cotta, Jose Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo Morgan-Warren, Robert J Maltman, John |
author_facet | Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza Silva Cotta, Jose Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo Morgan-Warren, Robert J Maltman, John |
author_sort | Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and were randomized 1:1 to BTFC or LM. Patients instilled one drop of medication once per day at 8 pm for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 81 patients enrolled, 43 were randomized to BTFC and 38 to LM. Mean (SD) change in IOP from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater for BTFC than for LM: −13.5 mmHg (4.48) versus −11.4 mmHg (3.19), respectively (P=0.003). Similarly, at 12 weeks, significantly more BTFC patients than LM patients had IOP reductions of ≥40% (74.4% versus 47.4%, P=0.015) or ≥50% (46.5% versus 15.8%, P=0.003). Adverse events were more frequent with BTFC than with LM (33 versus 13 events), but most were mild in severity. The only serious adverse event (colon cancer) was adjudged unrelated to the study medication. CONCLUSION: BTFC was effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve patients with OAG at high risk of progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3986331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39863312014-04-18 Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza Silva Cotta, Jose Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo Morgan-Warren, Robert J Maltman, John Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and were randomized 1:1 to BTFC or LM. Patients instilled one drop of medication once per day at 8 pm for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 81 patients enrolled, 43 were randomized to BTFC and 38 to LM. Mean (SD) change in IOP from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater for BTFC than for LM: −13.5 mmHg (4.48) versus −11.4 mmHg (3.19), respectively (P=0.003). Similarly, at 12 weeks, significantly more BTFC patients than LM patients had IOP reductions of ≥40% (74.4% versus 47.4%, P=0.015) or ≥50% (46.5% versus 15.8%, P=0.003). Adverse events were more frequent with BTFC than with LM (33 versus 13 events), but most were mild in severity. The only serious adverse event (colon cancer) was adjudged unrelated to the study medication. CONCLUSION: BTFC was effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve patients with OAG at high risk of progression. Dove Medical Press 2014-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3986331/ /pubmed/24748767 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735 Text en © 2014 Gutierrez-Diaz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza Silva Cotta, Jose Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo Morgan-Warren, Robert J Maltman, John Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study |
title | Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study |
title_full | Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study |
title_short | Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study |
title_sort | bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24748767 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gutierrezdiazesperanza bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy AT silvacottajose bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy AT munoznegretefranciscoj bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy AT gutierrezortizconsuelo bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy AT morganwarrenrobertj bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy AT maltmanjohn bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy |