Cargando…

Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza, Silva Cotta, Jose, Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J, Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo, Morgan-Warren, Robert J, Maltman, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24748767
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735
_version_ 1782311691213602816
author Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza
Silva Cotta, Jose
Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J
Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo
Morgan-Warren, Robert J
Maltman, John
author_facet Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza
Silva Cotta, Jose
Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J
Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo
Morgan-Warren, Robert J
Maltman, John
author_sort Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and were randomized 1:1 to BTFC or LM. Patients instilled one drop of medication once per day at 8 pm for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 81 patients enrolled, 43 were randomized to BTFC and 38 to LM. Mean (SD) change in IOP from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater for BTFC than for LM: −13.5 mmHg (4.48) versus −11.4 mmHg (3.19), respectively (P=0.003). Similarly, at 12 weeks, significantly more BTFC patients than LM patients had IOP reductions of ≥40% (74.4% versus 47.4%, P=0.015) or ≥50% (46.5% versus 15.8%, P=0.003). Adverse events were more frequent with BTFC than with LM (33 versus 13 events), but most were mild in severity. The only serious adverse event (colon cancer) was adjudged unrelated to the study medication. CONCLUSION: BTFC was effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve patients with OAG at high risk of progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39863312014-04-18 Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza Silva Cotta, Jose Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo Morgan-Warren, Robert J Maltman, John Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and were randomized 1:1 to BTFC or LM. Patients instilled one drop of medication once per day at 8 pm for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 81 patients enrolled, 43 were randomized to BTFC and 38 to LM. Mean (SD) change in IOP from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater for BTFC than for LM: −13.5 mmHg (4.48) versus −11.4 mmHg (3.19), respectively (P=0.003). Similarly, at 12 weeks, significantly more BTFC patients than LM patients had IOP reductions of ≥40% (74.4% versus 47.4%, P=0.015) or ≥50% (46.5% versus 15.8%, P=0.003). Adverse events were more frequent with BTFC than with LM (33 versus 13 events), but most were mild in severity. The only serious adverse event (colon cancer) was adjudged unrelated to the study medication. CONCLUSION: BTFC was effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve patients with OAG at high risk of progression. Dove Medical Press 2014-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3986331/ /pubmed/24748767 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735 Text en © 2014 Gutierrez-Diaz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gutierrez-Diaz, Esperanza
Silva Cotta, Jose
Muñoz-Negrete, Francisco J
Gutierrez-Ortiz, Consuelo
Morgan-Warren, Robert J
Maltman, John
Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
title Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
title_full Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
title_fullStr Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
title_short Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
title_sort bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24748767
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezdiazesperanza bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy
AT silvacottajose bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy
AT munoznegretefranciscoj bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy
AT gutierrezortizconsuelo bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy
AT morganwarrenrobertj bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy
AT maltmanjohn bimatoprosttimololfixedcombinationversuslatanoprostintreatmentnaiveglaucomapatientsathighriskofprogressionapilotstudy