Cargando…

Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus is highly prevalent and can lead to serious complications and mortality. Patient education can help to avoid negative outcomes, but up to half of the patients do not participate. The aim of this study was to analyze patients' attitudes towards diabetes education in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schäfer, Ingmar, Pawels, Marc, Küver, Claudia, Pohontsch, Nadine Janis, Scherer, Martin, van den Bussche, Hendrik, Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24733428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095035
_version_ 1782311697226137600
author Schäfer, Ingmar
Pawels, Marc
Küver, Claudia
Pohontsch, Nadine Janis
Scherer, Martin
van den Bussche, Hendrik
Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna
author_facet Schäfer, Ingmar
Pawels, Marc
Küver, Claudia
Pohontsch, Nadine Janis
Scherer, Martin
van den Bussche, Hendrik
Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna
author_sort Schäfer, Ingmar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus is highly prevalent and can lead to serious complications and mortality. Patient education can help to avoid negative outcomes, but up to half of the patients do not participate. The aim of this study was to analyze patients' attitudes towards diabetes education in order to identify barriers to participation and develop strategies for better patient education. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study. Seven GP practices were purposively selected based on socio-demographic data of city districts in Hamburg, Germany. Study participants were selected by their GPs in order to increase participation. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 14 patients. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The sample size was determined by data saturation. Data were analysed by qualitative content analysis. Categories were determined deductively and inductively. RESULTS: The interviews yielded four types of barriers: 1) Statements and behaviour of the attending physician influence the patients' decisions about diabetes education. 2) Both, a good state of health related to diabetes and physical/psychosocial comorbidity can be reasons for non-participation. 3) Manifold motivational factors were discussed. They ranged from giving low priority to diabetes to avoidance of implications of diabetes education as being confronted with illness narratives of others. 4) Barriers also include aspects of the patients' knowledge and activity. CONCLUSIONS: First, physicians should encourage patients to participate in diabetes education and argue that they can profit even if actual treatment and examination results are promising. Second, patients with other priorities, psychic comorbidity or functional limitations might profit more from continuous individualized education adapted to their specific situation instead of group education. Third, it might be justified that patients do not participate in diabetes education if they have slightly increased blood sugar values only and no risk for harmful consequences or if they already have sufficient knowledge on diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39863672014-04-15 Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study Schäfer, Ingmar Pawels, Marc Küver, Claudia Pohontsch, Nadine Janis Scherer, Martin van den Bussche, Hendrik Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus is highly prevalent and can lead to serious complications and mortality. Patient education can help to avoid negative outcomes, but up to half of the patients do not participate. The aim of this study was to analyze patients' attitudes towards diabetes education in order to identify barriers to participation and develop strategies for better patient education. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study. Seven GP practices were purposively selected based on socio-demographic data of city districts in Hamburg, Germany. Study participants were selected by their GPs in order to increase participation. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 14 patients. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The sample size was determined by data saturation. Data were analysed by qualitative content analysis. Categories were determined deductively and inductively. RESULTS: The interviews yielded four types of barriers: 1) Statements and behaviour of the attending physician influence the patients' decisions about diabetes education. 2) Both, a good state of health related to diabetes and physical/psychosocial comorbidity can be reasons for non-participation. 3) Manifold motivational factors were discussed. They ranged from giving low priority to diabetes to avoidance of implications of diabetes education as being confronted with illness narratives of others. 4) Barriers also include aspects of the patients' knowledge and activity. CONCLUSIONS: First, physicians should encourage patients to participate in diabetes education and argue that they can profit even if actual treatment and examination results are promising. Second, patients with other priorities, psychic comorbidity or functional limitations might profit more from continuous individualized education adapted to their specific situation instead of group education. Third, it might be justified that patients do not participate in diabetes education if they have slightly increased blood sugar values only and no risk for harmful consequences or if they already have sufficient knowledge on diabetes. Public Library of Science 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3986367/ /pubmed/24733428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095035 Text en © 2014 Schäfer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schäfer, Ingmar
Pawels, Marc
Küver, Claudia
Pohontsch, Nadine Janis
Scherer, Martin
van den Bussche, Hendrik
Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna
Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study
title Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study
title_full Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study
title_short Strategies for Improving Participation in Diabetes Education. A Qualitative Study
title_sort strategies for improving participation in diabetes education. a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24733428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095035
work_keys_str_mv AT schaferingmar strategiesforimprovingparticipationindiabeteseducationaqualitativestudy
AT pawelsmarc strategiesforimprovingparticipationindiabeteseducationaqualitativestudy
AT kuverclaudia strategiesforimprovingparticipationindiabeteseducationaqualitativestudy
AT pohontschnadinejanis strategiesforimprovingparticipationindiabeteseducationaqualitativestudy
AT scherermartin strategiesforimprovingparticipationindiabeteseducationaqualitativestudy
AT vandenbusschehendrik strategiesforimprovingparticipationindiabeteseducationaqualitativestudy
AT kaduszkiewiczhanna strategiesforimprovingparticipationindiabeteseducationaqualitativestudy