Cargando…
Bias, precision and statistical power of analysis of covariance in the analysis of randomized trials with baseline imbalance: a simulation study
BACKGROUND: Analysis of variance (ANOVA), change-score analysis (CSA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) respond differently to baseline imbalance in randomized controlled trials. However, no empirical studies appear to have quantified the differential bias and precision of estimates derived from t...
Autores principales: | Egbewale, Bolaji E, Lewis, Martyn, Sim, Julius |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24712304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-49 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evaluation of bias and precision in methods of analysis for pragmatic trials with missing outcome data: a simulation study
por: Joseph, Royes, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Common Design Concepts in Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Egbewale, Bolaji Emmanuel
Publicado: (2020) -
Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates
por: Pond, G R
Publicado: (2011) -
Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic
por: Leyrat, Clémence, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level
por: Moerbeek, Mirjam, et al.
Publicado: (2016)