Cargando…

Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares

BACKGROUND: Endometritis is a major cause of infertility in the mare. Therefore, the diagnosis of this disease is very important in veterinary practice. The objective of this study was to compare bacteriological and cytological results obtained from the mare uterus using biopsy (EB) and cytobrush (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buczkowska, Justyna, Kozdrowski, Roland, Nowak, Marcin, Raś, Andrzej, Staroniewicz, Zdzisław, Siemieniuch, Marta J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-27
_version_ 1782311709706289152
author Buczkowska, Justyna
Kozdrowski, Roland
Nowak, Marcin
Raś, Andrzej
Staroniewicz, Zdzisław
Siemieniuch, Marta J
author_facet Buczkowska, Justyna
Kozdrowski, Roland
Nowak, Marcin
Raś, Andrzej
Staroniewicz, Zdzisław
Siemieniuch, Marta J
author_sort Buczkowska, Justyna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endometritis is a major cause of infertility in the mare. Therefore, the diagnosis of this disease is very important in veterinary practice. The objective of this study was to compare bacteriological and cytological results obtained from the mare uterus using biopsy (EB) and cytobrush (CB) techniques and relating these findings to the presence of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) in endometrial tissue as the gold standard for detection of endometritis. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that endometrial cytology and microbiology data obtained from material collected using the EB and CB techniques are similar, so that the CB technique could preferentially be used to detect subclinical endometritis in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 69 mares suspected of subclinical endometritis because of previous reproductive history and 15 maiden mares were enrolled in this study. Material collected from both EB and CB was smeared on sterile glass slides for cytological examinations and on culture media for microbiological examinations. Bacteriological cultures and cytological samples were classified as negative (no growth or mixed cultures of more than three microorganisms; <2% PMNs) or positive (pure growth of microorganisms; >2% PMNs) for endometritis. RESULTS: Positive growth was observed in 43% of CB samples and in 54% of EB samples (difference not significant). The growth of β-hemolytic streptococci was always connected with positive cytology. This relationship was not observed for growth of E. coli or for non-pathogenic flora. The sensitivity of bacterial growth and cytology from EB was 0.63 and 0.73 respectively. The sensitivities of bacterial growth and cytology from CB were 0.50 and 0.71 respectively. CONCLUSION: Microbiological and cytological results obtained from CB are similar to those obtained from EB and based on these findings the CB technique may be recommended for collection of materials from the mare’s uterus in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39864392014-04-16 Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares Buczkowska, Justyna Kozdrowski, Roland Nowak, Marcin Raś, Andrzej Staroniewicz, Zdzisław Siemieniuch, Marta J Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Endometritis is a major cause of infertility in the mare. Therefore, the diagnosis of this disease is very important in veterinary practice. The objective of this study was to compare bacteriological and cytological results obtained from the mare uterus using biopsy (EB) and cytobrush (CB) techniques and relating these findings to the presence of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) in endometrial tissue as the gold standard for detection of endometritis. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that endometrial cytology and microbiology data obtained from material collected using the EB and CB techniques are similar, so that the CB technique could preferentially be used to detect subclinical endometritis in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 69 mares suspected of subclinical endometritis because of previous reproductive history and 15 maiden mares were enrolled in this study. Material collected from both EB and CB was smeared on sterile glass slides for cytological examinations and on culture media for microbiological examinations. Bacteriological cultures and cytological samples were classified as negative (no growth or mixed cultures of more than three microorganisms; <2% PMNs) or positive (pure growth of microorganisms; >2% PMNs) for endometritis. RESULTS: Positive growth was observed in 43% of CB samples and in 54% of EB samples (difference not significant). The growth of β-hemolytic streptococci was always connected with positive cytology. This relationship was not observed for growth of E. coli or for non-pathogenic flora. The sensitivity of bacterial growth and cytology from EB was 0.63 and 0.73 respectively. The sensitivities of bacterial growth and cytology from CB were 0.50 and 0.71 respectively. CONCLUSION: Microbiological and cytological results obtained from CB are similar to those obtained from EB and based on these findings the CB technique may be recommended for collection of materials from the mare’s uterus in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2014-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3986439/ /pubmed/24708825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-27 Text en Copyright © 2014 Buczkowska et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Buczkowska, Justyna
Kozdrowski, Roland
Nowak, Marcin
Raś, Andrzej
Staroniewicz, Zdzisław
Siemieniuch, Marta J
Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares
title Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares
title_full Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares
title_fullStr Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares
title_short Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares
title_sort comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-27
work_keys_str_mv AT buczkowskajustyna comparisonofthebiopsyandcytobrushtechniquesfordiagnosisofsubclinicalendometritisinmares
AT kozdrowskiroland comparisonofthebiopsyandcytobrushtechniquesfordiagnosisofsubclinicalendometritisinmares
AT nowakmarcin comparisonofthebiopsyandcytobrushtechniquesfordiagnosisofsubclinicalendometritisinmares
AT rasandrzej comparisonofthebiopsyandcytobrushtechniquesfordiagnosisofsubclinicalendometritisinmares
AT staroniewiczzdzisław comparisonofthebiopsyandcytobrushtechniquesfordiagnosisofsubclinicalendometritisinmares
AT siemieniuchmartaj comparisonofthebiopsyandcytobrushtechniquesfordiagnosisofsubclinicalendometritisinmares