Cargando…

Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The overall caesarean rate in France has increased from 14.3% in 1994–1996 to 21.0% in 2010. This increased rate is a concern in all developed countries: delivery by caesarean induces both short- and long-term maternal complications, and its use requires careful reflection. The principal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vendittelli, Françoise, Tassié, Marie-Caroline, Gerbaud, Laurent, Lémery, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24716672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-135
_version_ 1782311710617501696
author Vendittelli, Françoise
Tassié, Marie-Caroline
Gerbaud, Laurent
Lémery, Didier
author_facet Vendittelli, Françoise
Tassié, Marie-Caroline
Gerbaud, Laurent
Lémery, Didier
author_sort Vendittelli, Françoise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The overall caesarean rate in France has increased from 14.3% in 1994–1996 to 21.0% in 2010. This increased rate is a concern in all developed countries: delivery by caesarean induces both short- and long-term maternal complications, and its use requires careful reflection. The principal objective of this work was to describe the global appropriateness of indications for caesareans among a selected sample of planned caesareans performed within the Auvergne perinatal health network. The secondary objectives were to describe the inappropriate planned caesarean risk according to the maternity unit level and the impact of this medical assessment on the global caesarean rate in this network. METHODS: This audit among maternity units belonging to the Auvergne perinatal network in France included women who had a planned caesarean at term, were nulliparous or primiparous, and had a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation or a twin pregnancy with twin 1 in cephalic presentation. We used the French guidelines issued from 1998 through 2010 as our benchmark for appropriateness. RESULT: We analysed 192 cases (100% of the records eligible for the audit). The rate of appropriate caesareans among these planned caesareans was 65.6%. Among the inappropriate caesareans, the rate of “maternal-preference” caesareans was 12.0% and the rate of “provider-preference” caesareans 22.4%. The risk of an inappropriate caesarean did not differ statistically between the level I and level II maternity wards, each compared to the level III hospital. The overall caesarean rate in our entire network decreased from 20.5% to 18.5% (p < 0.001) in the year after the audit. It also decreased in 8 of the network’s 10 maternity units, although the difference was statistically significant only in 2. CONCLUSIONS: About one third of planned caesareans were inappropriate in our sample and our audit appeared to have some effect on medical practice in the short run.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39864432014-04-16 Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study Vendittelli, Françoise Tassié, Marie-Caroline Gerbaud, Laurent Lémery, Didier BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The overall caesarean rate in France has increased from 14.3% in 1994–1996 to 21.0% in 2010. This increased rate is a concern in all developed countries: delivery by caesarean induces both short- and long-term maternal complications, and its use requires careful reflection. The principal objective of this work was to describe the global appropriateness of indications for caesareans among a selected sample of planned caesareans performed within the Auvergne perinatal health network. The secondary objectives were to describe the inappropriate planned caesarean risk according to the maternity unit level and the impact of this medical assessment on the global caesarean rate in this network. METHODS: This audit among maternity units belonging to the Auvergne perinatal network in France included women who had a planned caesarean at term, were nulliparous or primiparous, and had a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation or a twin pregnancy with twin 1 in cephalic presentation. We used the French guidelines issued from 1998 through 2010 as our benchmark for appropriateness. RESULT: We analysed 192 cases (100% of the records eligible for the audit). The rate of appropriate caesareans among these planned caesareans was 65.6%. Among the inappropriate caesareans, the rate of “maternal-preference” caesareans was 12.0% and the rate of “provider-preference” caesareans 22.4%. The risk of an inappropriate caesarean did not differ statistically between the level I and level II maternity wards, each compared to the level III hospital. The overall caesarean rate in our entire network decreased from 20.5% to 18.5% (p < 0.001) in the year after the audit. It also decreased in 8 of the network’s 10 maternity units, although the difference was statistically significant only in 2. CONCLUSIONS: About one third of planned caesareans were inappropriate in our sample and our audit appeared to have some effect on medical practice in the short run. BioMed Central 2014-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3986443/ /pubmed/24716672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-135 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vendittelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vendittelli, Françoise
Tassié, Marie-Caroline
Gerbaud, Laurent
Lémery, Didier
Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
title Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
title_full Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
title_short Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
title_sort appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24716672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-135
work_keys_str_mv AT vendittellifrancoise appropriatenessofelectivecaesareandeliveriesinaperinatalnetworkacrosssectionalstudy
AT tassiemariecaroline appropriatenessofelectivecaesareandeliveriesinaperinatalnetworkacrosssectionalstudy
AT gerbaudlaurent appropriatenessofelectivecaesareandeliveriesinaperinatalnetworkacrosssectionalstudy
AT lemerydidier appropriatenessofelectivecaesareandeliveriesinaperinatalnetworkacrosssectionalstudy