Cargando…

Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies

BACKGROUND: Automated whole slide imaging (WSI), also known as virtual microscopy is rapidly becoming an important tool in diagnostic pathology. Currently, the primary utilization of the technique is for transmission of digital images, for second opinion consultation, as well as for quality assuranc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reyes, Carolina, Ikpatt, Offiong F., Nadji, Mehrdad, Cote, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24741464
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.127814
_version_ 1782311726074560512
author Reyes, Carolina
Ikpatt, Offiong F.
Nadji, Mehrdad
Cote, Richard J.
author_facet Reyes, Carolina
Ikpatt, Offiong F.
Nadji, Mehrdad
Cote, Richard J.
author_sort Reyes, Carolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Automated whole slide imaging (WSI), also known as virtual microscopy is rapidly becoming an important tool in diagnostic pathology. Currently, the primary utilization of the technique is for transmission of digital images, for second opinion consultation, as well as for quality assurance and education. The high-resolution of digital images along with the refinement of technology could now allow for WSI to be used as an alternative to conventional microscopy (CM) as a first line diagnostic platform. However, the accuracy and reproducibility of the technology for the routine histopathologic diagnosis has not been established yet. This study was undertaken to compare the intra-observer variability of WSI and CM in the primary diagnosis of breast biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three consecutive core needle biopsies of breast were selected for this study. Each slide was digitally scanned and the images were stored in a shared file. Three board-certified pathologists independently reviewed the glass slides by CM first, and in an interval of 2-3 weeks for the 2(nd) time to establish their baseline CM versus CM reproducibility. They then reviewed the digital images of all cases following the same interval of time to compare the reproducibility of WSI versus CM for each observer. The diagnostic categories included the typical range of benign and malignant mammary lesions. RESULTS: The intra-observer variability for CM versus CM was 4%, 7%, and 0% for observers 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The diagnostic variability for WSI versus CM was 1%, 4%, and 1% for the same observers. All diagnostic disagreements were between ductal hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. There was no intra-observer disagreement in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant disease. CONCLUSIONS: The intra-observer variability in the diagnosis of the core needle biopsies of the breast by high-resolution, WSI was the same as conventional glass slide microscopy. These results suggest that, WSI could be used similar to CM for the initial diagnosis of breast biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39865362014-04-16 Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies Reyes, Carolina Ikpatt, Offiong F. Nadji, Mehrdad Cote, Richard J. J Pathol Inform Original Article BACKGROUND: Automated whole slide imaging (WSI), also known as virtual microscopy is rapidly becoming an important tool in diagnostic pathology. Currently, the primary utilization of the technique is for transmission of digital images, for second opinion consultation, as well as for quality assurance and education. The high-resolution of digital images along with the refinement of technology could now allow for WSI to be used as an alternative to conventional microscopy (CM) as a first line diagnostic platform. However, the accuracy and reproducibility of the technology for the routine histopathologic diagnosis has not been established yet. This study was undertaken to compare the intra-observer variability of WSI and CM in the primary diagnosis of breast biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three consecutive core needle biopsies of breast were selected for this study. Each slide was digitally scanned and the images were stored in a shared file. Three board-certified pathologists independently reviewed the glass slides by CM first, and in an interval of 2-3 weeks for the 2(nd) time to establish their baseline CM versus CM reproducibility. They then reviewed the digital images of all cases following the same interval of time to compare the reproducibility of WSI versus CM for each observer. The diagnostic categories included the typical range of benign and malignant mammary lesions. RESULTS: The intra-observer variability for CM versus CM was 4%, 7%, and 0% for observers 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The diagnostic variability for WSI versus CM was 1%, 4%, and 1% for the same observers. All diagnostic disagreements were between ductal hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. There was no intra-observer disagreement in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant disease. CONCLUSIONS: The intra-observer variability in the diagnosis of the core needle biopsies of the breast by high-resolution, WSI was the same as conventional glass slide microscopy. These results suggest that, WSI could be used similar to CM for the initial diagnosis of breast biopsies. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3986536/ /pubmed/24741464 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.127814 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Reyes C. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reyes, Carolina
Ikpatt, Offiong F.
Nadji, Mehrdad
Cote, Richard J.
Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
title Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
title_full Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
title_fullStr Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
title_short Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
title_sort intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24741464
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.127814
work_keys_str_mv AT reyescarolina intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies
AT ikpattoffiongf intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies
AT nadjimehrdad intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies
AT coterichardj intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies