Cargando…
A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
Video-based gaze-tracking systems are typically restricted in terms of their effective tracking space. This constraint limits the use of eyetrackers in studying mobile human behavior. Here, we compare two possible approaches for estimating the gaze of participants who are free to walk in a large spa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24782737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00200 |
_version_ | 1782311730902204416 |
---|---|
author | Browatzki, Björn Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Chuang, Lewis L. |
author_facet | Browatzki, Björn Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Chuang, Lewis L. |
author_sort | Browatzki, Björn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Video-based gaze-tracking systems are typically restricted in terms of their effective tracking space. This constraint limits the use of eyetrackers in studying mobile human behavior. Here, we compare two possible approaches for estimating the gaze of participants who are free to walk in a large space whilst looking at different regions of a large display. Geometrically, we linearly combined eye-in-head rotations and head-in-world coordinates to derive a gaze vector and its intersection with a planar display, by relying on the use of a head-mounted eyetracker and body-motion tracker. Alternatively, we employed Gaussian process regression to estimate the gaze intersection directly from the input data itself. Our evaluation of both methods indicates that a regression approach can deliver comparable results to a geometric approach. The regression approach is favored, given that it has the potential for further optimization, provides confidence bounds for its gaze estimates and offers greater flexibility in its implementation. Open-source software for the methods reported here is also provided for user implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3986557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39865572014-04-29 A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking Browatzki, Björn Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Chuang, Lewis L. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Video-based gaze-tracking systems are typically restricted in terms of their effective tracking space. This constraint limits the use of eyetrackers in studying mobile human behavior. Here, we compare two possible approaches for estimating the gaze of participants who are free to walk in a large space whilst looking at different regions of a large display. Geometrically, we linearly combined eye-in-head rotations and head-in-world coordinates to derive a gaze vector and its intersection with a planar display, by relying on the use of a head-mounted eyetracker and body-motion tracker. Alternatively, we employed Gaussian process regression to estimate the gaze intersection directly from the input data itself. Our evaluation of both methods indicates that a regression approach can deliver comparable results to a geometric approach. The regression approach is favored, given that it has the potential for further optimization, provides confidence bounds for its gaze estimates and offers greater flexibility in its implementation. Open-source software for the methods reported here is also provided for user implementation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3986557/ /pubmed/24782737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00200 Text en Copyright © 2014 Browatzki, Bülthoff and Chuang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Browatzki, Björn Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Chuang, Lewis L. A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking |
title | A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking |
title_full | A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking |
title_fullStr | A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking |
title_short | A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking |
title_sort | comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24782737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT browatzkibjorn acomparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking AT bulthoffheinrichh acomparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking AT chuanglewisl acomparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking AT browatzkibjorn comparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking AT bulthoffheinrichh comparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking AT chuanglewisl comparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking |