Cargando…

A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking

Video-based gaze-tracking systems are typically restricted in terms of their effective tracking space. This constraint limits the use of eyetrackers in studying mobile human behavior. Here, we compare two possible approaches for estimating the gaze of participants who are free to walk in a large spa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Browatzki, Björn, Bülthoff, Heinrich H., Chuang, Lewis L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24782737
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00200
_version_ 1782311730902204416
author Browatzki, Björn
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Chuang, Lewis L.
author_facet Browatzki, Björn
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Chuang, Lewis L.
author_sort Browatzki, Björn
collection PubMed
description Video-based gaze-tracking systems are typically restricted in terms of their effective tracking space. This constraint limits the use of eyetrackers in studying mobile human behavior. Here, we compare two possible approaches for estimating the gaze of participants who are free to walk in a large space whilst looking at different regions of a large display. Geometrically, we linearly combined eye-in-head rotations and head-in-world coordinates to derive a gaze vector and its intersection with a planar display, by relying on the use of a head-mounted eyetracker and body-motion tracker. Alternatively, we employed Gaussian process regression to estimate the gaze intersection directly from the input data itself. Our evaluation of both methods indicates that a regression approach can deliver comparable results to a geometric approach. The regression approach is favored, given that it has the potential for further optimization, provides confidence bounds for its gaze estimates and offers greater flexibility in its implementation. Open-source software for the methods reported here is also provided for user implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39865572014-04-29 A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking Browatzki, Björn Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Chuang, Lewis L. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Video-based gaze-tracking systems are typically restricted in terms of their effective tracking space. This constraint limits the use of eyetrackers in studying mobile human behavior. Here, we compare two possible approaches for estimating the gaze of participants who are free to walk in a large space whilst looking at different regions of a large display. Geometrically, we linearly combined eye-in-head rotations and head-in-world coordinates to derive a gaze vector and its intersection with a planar display, by relying on the use of a head-mounted eyetracker and body-motion tracker. Alternatively, we employed Gaussian process regression to estimate the gaze intersection directly from the input data itself. Our evaluation of both methods indicates that a regression approach can deliver comparable results to a geometric approach. The regression approach is favored, given that it has the potential for further optimization, provides confidence bounds for its gaze estimates and offers greater flexibility in its implementation. Open-source software for the methods reported here is also provided for user implementation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3986557/ /pubmed/24782737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00200 Text en Copyright © 2014 Browatzki, Bülthoff and Chuang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Browatzki, Björn
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Chuang, Lewis L.
A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
title A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
title_full A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
title_fullStr A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
title_short A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
title_sort comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24782737
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00200
work_keys_str_mv AT browatzkibjorn acomparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking
AT bulthoffheinrichh acomparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking
AT chuanglewisl acomparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking
AT browatzkibjorn comparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking
AT bulthoffheinrichh comparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking
AT chuanglewisl comparisonofgeometricandregressionbasedmobilegazetracking