Cargando…

Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer

BACKGROUND: Changes to sexual wellbeing are acknowledged to be a long-term negative consequence of cancer and cancer treatment. These changes can have a negative effect on psychological well-being, quality of life and couple relationships. Whilst previous conclusions are based on univariate analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perz, Janette, Ussher, Jane M, Gilbert, Emilee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24673768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-228
_version_ 1782311755503894528
author Perz, Janette
Ussher, Jane M
Gilbert, Emilee
author_facet Perz, Janette
Ussher, Jane M
Gilbert, Emilee
author_sort Perz, Janette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Changes to sexual wellbeing are acknowledged to be a long-term negative consequence of cancer and cancer treatment. These changes can have a negative effect on psychological well-being, quality of life and couple relationships. Whilst previous conclusions are based on univariate analysis, multivariate research can facilitate examination of the complex interaction between sexual function and psycho-social variables such as psychological wellbeing, quality of life, and relationship satisfaction and communication in the context of cancer, the aim of the present study. METHOD: Six hundred and fifty seven people with cancer (535 women, 122 men) and 148 partners (87 women, 61 men), across a range of sexual and non-sexual cancers, completed a survey consisting of standardized measures of sexual functioning, depression and anxiety, quality of life, relationship satisfaction, dyadic sexual communication, and self-silencing, as well as ratings of the importance of sex to life and relationships. RESULTS: Men and women participants, reported reductions in sexual functioning after cancer across cancer type, for both people with cancer and partners. Multiple regression analysis examined psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning. Physical quality of life was a predictor for men and women with cancer, and for male partners. Dyadic sexual communication was a predictor for women with cancer, and for men and women partners. Mental quality of life and depression were also predictors for women with cancer, and the lower self-sacrifice subscale of self-silencing a predictor for men with cancer. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that information and supportive interventions developed to alleviate sexual difficulties and facilitate sexual renegotiation should be offered to men and women with both sexual and non-sexual cancers, rather than primarily focused on individuals with sexual and reproductive cancers, as is the case currently. It is also important to include partners in supportive interventions. Interventions aimed at improving sexual functioning should include elements aimed at improving physical quality of life and sexual communication, with a focus on psychological wellbeing also being important for women with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39866912014-04-16 Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer Perz, Janette Ussher, Jane M Gilbert, Emilee BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Changes to sexual wellbeing are acknowledged to be a long-term negative consequence of cancer and cancer treatment. These changes can have a negative effect on psychological well-being, quality of life and couple relationships. Whilst previous conclusions are based on univariate analysis, multivariate research can facilitate examination of the complex interaction between sexual function and psycho-social variables such as psychological wellbeing, quality of life, and relationship satisfaction and communication in the context of cancer, the aim of the present study. METHOD: Six hundred and fifty seven people with cancer (535 women, 122 men) and 148 partners (87 women, 61 men), across a range of sexual and non-sexual cancers, completed a survey consisting of standardized measures of sexual functioning, depression and anxiety, quality of life, relationship satisfaction, dyadic sexual communication, and self-silencing, as well as ratings of the importance of sex to life and relationships. RESULTS: Men and women participants, reported reductions in sexual functioning after cancer across cancer type, for both people with cancer and partners. Multiple regression analysis examined psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning. Physical quality of life was a predictor for men and women with cancer, and for male partners. Dyadic sexual communication was a predictor for women with cancer, and for men and women partners. Mental quality of life and depression were also predictors for women with cancer, and the lower self-sacrifice subscale of self-silencing a predictor for men with cancer. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that information and supportive interventions developed to alleviate sexual difficulties and facilitate sexual renegotiation should be offered to men and women with both sexual and non-sexual cancers, rather than primarily focused on individuals with sexual and reproductive cancers, as is the case currently. It is also important to include partners in supportive interventions. Interventions aimed at improving sexual functioning should include elements aimed at improving physical quality of life and sexual communication, with a focus on psychological wellbeing also being important for women with cancer. BioMed Central 2014-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3986691/ /pubmed/24673768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-228 Text en Copyright © 2014 Perz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perz, Janette
Ussher, Jane M
Gilbert, Emilee
Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
title Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
title_full Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
title_fullStr Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
title_full_unstemmed Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
title_short Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
title_sort feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24673768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-228
work_keys_str_mv AT perzjanette feelingwellandtalkingaboutsexpsychosocialpredictorsofsexualfunctioningaftercancer
AT ussherjanem feelingwellandtalkingaboutsexpsychosocialpredictorsofsexualfunctioningaftercancer
AT gilbertemilee feelingwellandtalkingaboutsexpsychosocialpredictorsofsexualfunctioningaftercancer