Cargando…

Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing

BACKGROUND: Conventional spin-echo (PD-CSE) and fast spin-echo (PD-FSE) techniques are frequently used to detect meniscal tears. However, the time delay for imaging with PD-CSE has resulted in its replacement with faster techniques, such as proton density fast spin-echo (PD-FSE), which has become a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nogueira, Ibevan A, Frère, Annie F, Silva, Alessandro P, de Oliveira, Heverton C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24673813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-33
_version_ 1782311778541109248
author Nogueira, Ibevan A
Frère, Annie F
Silva, Alessandro P
de Oliveira, Heverton C
author_facet Nogueira, Ibevan A
Frère, Annie F
Silva, Alessandro P
de Oliveira, Heverton C
author_sort Nogueira, Ibevan A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventional spin-echo (PD-CSE) and fast spin-echo (PD-FSE) techniques are frequently used to detect meniscal tears. However, the time delay for imaging with PD-CSE has resulted in its replacement with faster techniques, such as proton density fast spin-echo (PD-FSE), which has become a frequent tool at most diagnostic centres. Qualitative analysis shows that the PD-CSE technique is more sensitive, but other authors have not found significant differences between the aforementioned techniques. Therefore, we performed a quantitative analysis in this study that aims to measure differences in the quality of the images obtained with both techniques. METHODS: We compared the PD-CSE and PD-FSE techniques by quantitatively analysing the obtained proton density images: the area shown, as well as the brightness and lesion contrast of the obtained image. A set of 100 images from 50 patients thought to contain meniscal tears of the knee were selected. These 100 images were obtained from all individuals using both the PD-CSE and PD-FSE techniques. The images were processed using software developed in Delphi. In addition to these quantifications, three physicians, who are specialists in radiology and capable of analysing magnetic resonance (MR) images of the musculoskeletal system, qualitatively analysed the diagnostic sensitivity of both techniques. RESULTS: On average, samples obtained via the PD-CSE technique contained 22% more pixels in the lesion area. The contrast differed by 28%, and the brightness differed by 31%. The two techniques were correlated using Student’s t-test, which showed a statistically significant difference. The specialists detected meniscal tears in 30 of the images obtained via the PD-CSE technique, while only 72% of these cases were detected via the PD-FSE technique. CONCLUSIONS: The PD-CSE technique was shown to be superior to PD-FSE for all of the evaluated properties, making its selection preferable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39868512014-04-16 Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing Nogueira, Ibevan A Frère, Annie F Silva, Alessandro P de Oliveira, Heverton C Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Conventional spin-echo (PD-CSE) and fast spin-echo (PD-FSE) techniques are frequently used to detect meniscal tears. However, the time delay for imaging with PD-CSE has resulted in its replacement with faster techniques, such as proton density fast spin-echo (PD-FSE), which has become a frequent tool at most diagnostic centres. Qualitative analysis shows that the PD-CSE technique is more sensitive, but other authors have not found significant differences between the aforementioned techniques. Therefore, we performed a quantitative analysis in this study that aims to measure differences in the quality of the images obtained with both techniques. METHODS: We compared the PD-CSE and PD-FSE techniques by quantitatively analysing the obtained proton density images: the area shown, as well as the brightness and lesion contrast of the obtained image. A set of 100 images from 50 patients thought to contain meniscal tears of the knee were selected. These 100 images were obtained from all individuals using both the PD-CSE and PD-FSE techniques. The images were processed using software developed in Delphi. In addition to these quantifications, three physicians, who are specialists in radiology and capable of analysing magnetic resonance (MR) images of the musculoskeletal system, qualitatively analysed the diagnostic sensitivity of both techniques. RESULTS: On average, samples obtained via the PD-CSE technique contained 22% more pixels in the lesion area. The contrast differed by 28%, and the brightness differed by 31%. The two techniques were correlated using Student’s t-test, which showed a statistically significant difference. The specialists detected meniscal tears in 30 of the images obtained via the PD-CSE technique, while only 72% of these cases were detected via the PD-FSE technique. CONCLUSIONS: The PD-CSE technique was shown to be superior to PD-FSE for all of the evaluated properties, making its selection preferable. BioMed Central 2014-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3986851/ /pubmed/24673813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-33 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nogueira et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nogueira, Ibevan A
Frère, Annie F
Silva, Alessandro P
de Oliveira, Heverton C
Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing
title Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing
title_full Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing
title_fullStr Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing
title_full_unstemmed Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing
title_short Meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing
title_sort meniscal tears: comparison of the conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques through image processing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24673813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-33
work_keys_str_mv AT nogueiraibevana meniscaltearscomparisonoftheconventionalspinechoandfastspinechotechniquesthroughimageprocessing
AT frereannief meniscaltearscomparisonoftheconventionalspinechoandfastspinechotechniquesthroughimageprocessing
AT silvaalessandrop meniscaltearscomparisonoftheconventionalspinechoandfastspinechotechniquesthroughimageprocessing
AT deoliveirahevertonc meniscaltearscomparisonoftheconventionalspinechoandfastspinechotechniquesthroughimageprocessing