Cargando…

Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia

Taxation has been suggested as a possible preventive strategy to address the serious public health concern of childhood obesity. Understanding the public’s viewpoint on the potential role of taxation is vital to inform policy decisions if they are to be acceptable to the wider community. A Citizens’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moretto, Nicole, Kendall, Elizabeth, Whitty, Jennifer, Byrnes, Joshua, Hills, Andrew P., Gordon, Louisa, Turkstra, Erika, Scuffham, Paul, Comans, Tracy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110302456
_version_ 1782311806399676416
author Moretto, Nicole
Kendall, Elizabeth
Whitty, Jennifer
Byrnes, Joshua
Hills, Andrew P.
Gordon, Louisa
Turkstra, Erika
Scuffham, Paul
Comans, Tracy
author_facet Moretto, Nicole
Kendall, Elizabeth
Whitty, Jennifer
Byrnes, Joshua
Hills, Andrew P.
Gordon, Louisa
Turkstra, Erika
Scuffham, Paul
Comans, Tracy
author_sort Moretto, Nicole
collection PubMed
description Taxation has been suggested as a possible preventive strategy to address the serious public health concern of childhood obesity. Understanding the public’s viewpoint on the potential role of taxation is vital to inform policy decisions if they are to be acceptable to the wider community. A Citizens’ Jury is a deliberative method for engaging the public in decision making and can assist in setting policy agendas. A Citizens’ Jury was conducted in Brisbane, Australia in May 2013 to answer the question: Is taxation on food and drinks an acceptable strategy to the public in order to reduce rates of childhood obesity? Citizens were randomly selected from the electoral roll and invited to participate. Thirteen members were purposively sampled from those expressing interest to broadly reflect the diversity of the Australian public. Over two days, participants were presented with evidence on the topic by experts, were able to question witnesses and deliberate on the evidence. The jurors unanimously supported taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks but generally did not support taxation on processed meats, snack foods and foods eaten/ purchased outside the home. They also supported taxation on snack foods on the condition that traffic light labelling was also introduced. Though they were not specifically asked to deliberate strategies outside of taxation, the jurors strongly recommended more nutritional information on all food packaging using the traffic light and teaspoon labelling systems for sugar, salt and fat content. The Citizens’ Jury suggests that the general public may support taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks to reduce rates of obesity in children. Regulatory reforms of taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks and improved labelling of nutritional information on product packaging were strongly supported by all members of the jury. These reforms should be considered by governments to prevent childhood obesity and the future burden on society from the consequences of obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3986986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39869862014-04-15 Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia Moretto, Nicole Kendall, Elizabeth Whitty, Jennifer Byrnes, Joshua Hills, Andrew P. Gordon, Louisa Turkstra, Erika Scuffham, Paul Comans, Tracy Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Taxation has been suggested as a possible preventive strategy to address the serious public health concern of childhood obesity. Understanding the public’s viewpoint on the potential role of taxation is vital to inform policy decisions if they are to be acceptable to the wider community. A Citizens’ Jury is a deliberative method for engaging the public in decision making and can assist in setting policy agendas. A Citizens’ Jury was conducted in Brisbane, Australia in May 2013 to answer the question: Is taxation on food and drinks an acceptable strategy to the public in order to reduce rates of childhood obesity? Citizens were randomly selected from the electoral roll and invited to participate. Thirteen members were purposively sampled from those expressing interest to broadly reflect the diversity of the Australian public. Over two days, participants were presented with evidence on the topic by experts, were able to question witnesses and deliberate on the evidence. The jurors unanimously supported taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks but generally did not support taxation on processed meats, snack foods and foods eaten/ purchased outside the home. They also supported taxation on snack foods on the condition that traffic light labelling was also introduced. Though they were not specifically asked to deliberate strategies outside of taxation, the jurors strongly recommended more nutritional information on all food packaging using the traffic light and teaspoon labelling systems for sugar, salt and fat content. The Citizens’ Jury suggests that the general public may support taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks to reduce rates of obesity in children. Regulatory reforms of taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks and improved labelling of nutritional information on product packaging were strongly supported by all members of the jury. These reforms should be considered by governments to prevent childhood obesity and the future burden on society from the consequences of obesity. MDPI 2014-02-27 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3986986/ /pubmed/24583829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110302456 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moretto, Nicole
Kendall, Elizabeth
Whitty, Jennifer
Byrnes, Joshua
Hills, Andrew P.
Gordon, Louisa
Turkstra, Erika
Scuffham, Paul
Comans, Tracy
Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
title Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
title_full Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
title_fullStr Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
title_short Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
title_sort yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens’ jury in australia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110302456
work_keys_str_mv AT morettonicole yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT kendallelizabeth yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT whittyjennifer yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT byrnesjoshua yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT hillsandrewp yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT gordonlouisa yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT turkstraerika yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT scuffhampaul yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia
AT comanstracy yesthegovernmentshouldtaxsoftdrinksfindingsfromacitizensjuryinaustralia