Cargando…

Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer is thought to be important for improving survival. Longer time between the onset of cancer symptoms and receipt of treatment may help explain the poorer survival of UK cancer patients compared to that in other countries. Socio-economic inequalities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forrest, Lynne F, Sowden, Sarah, Rubin, Greg, White, Martin, Adams, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24666556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-30
_version_ 1782311834957643776
author Forrest, Lynne F
Sowden, Sarah
Rubin, Greg
White, Martin
Adams, Jean
author_facet Forrest, Lynne F
Sowden, Sarah
Rubin, Greg
White, Martin
Adams, Jean
author_sort Forrest, Lynne F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer is thought to be important for improving survival. Longer time between the onset of cancer symptoms and receipt of treatment may help explain the poorer survival of UK cancer patients compared to that in other countries. Socio-economic inequalities in receipt of, and time to, treatment may contribute to socio-economic differences in cancer survival. Socio-economic inequalities in receipt of lung cancer treatment have been shown in a recent systematic review. However, no systematic review of the evidence for socio-economic inequalities in time to presentation (patient interval), time to first investigation (primary care interval), time to secondary care investigation (referral interval), time to diagnosis (diagnostic interval), and time to treatment (treatment interval) has been conducted. This review aims to assess the published and grey literature evidence for socio-economic inequalities in the length of time spent on the lung cancer diagnostic and treatment pathway, examining interim intervals on the pathway where inequalities might occur. METHODS: Systematic methods will be used to identify relevant studies, assess study eligibility for inclusion, and evaluate study quality. The online databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL will be searched to locate cohort studies of adults with a primary diagnosis of lung cancer; where the outcome is mean or median time to the interval endpoint (or a suitable proxy measure of this), or the likelihood of longer or shorter time to the endpoint; analysed by a measure of socio-economic position. Meta-analysis will be conducted if there are sufficient studies available with suitable data. DISCUSSION: This review will systematically determine if there are socio-economic inequalities in time from symptom onset to treatment for lung cancer. If such inequalities are present, our review evidence will help inform the development of interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis and treatment, ultimately helping to reduce socio-economic inequalities in survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014007145
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3987127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39871272014-04-16 Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Forrest, Lynne F Sowden, Sarah Rubin, Greg White, Martin Adams, Jean Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer is thought to be important for improving survival. Longer time between the onset of cancer symptoms and receipt of treatment may help explain the poorer survival of UK cancer patients compared to that in other countries. Socio-economic inequalities in receipt of, and time to, treatment may contribute to socio-economic differences in cancer survival. Socio-economic inequalities in receipt of lung cancer treatment have been shown in a recent systematic review. However, no systematic review of the evidence for socio-economic inequalities in time to presentation (patient interval), time to first investigation (primary care interval), time to secondary care investigation (referral interval), time to diagnosis (diagnostic interval), and time to treatment (treatment interval) has been conducted. This review aims to assess the published and grey literature evidence for socio-economic inequalities in the length of time spent on the lung cancer diagnostic and treatment pathway, examining interim intervals on the pathway where inequalities might occur. METHODS: Systematic methods will be used to identify relevant studies, assess study eligibility for inclusion, and evaluate study quality. The online databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL will be searched to locate cohort studies of adults with a primary diagnosis of lung cancer; where the outcome is mean or median time to the interval endpoint (or a suitable proxy measure of this), or the likelihood of longer or shorter time to the endpoint; analysed by a measure of socio-economic position. Meta-analysis will be conducted if there are sufficient studies available with suitable data. DISCUSSION: This review will systematically determine if there are socio-economic inequalities in time from symptom onset to treatment for lung cancer. If such inequalities are present, our review evidence will help inform the development of interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis and treatment, ultimately helping to reduce socio-economic inequalities in survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014007145 BioMed Central 2014-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3987127/ /pubmed/24666556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-30 Text en Copyright © 2014 Forrest et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Forrest, Lynne F
Sowden, Sarah
Rubin, Greg
White, Martin
Adams, Jean
Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24666556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-30
work_keys_str_mv AT forrestlynnef socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientprimarycarereferraldiagnosticandtreatmentintervalsonthelungcancercarepathwayprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sowdensarah socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientprimarycarereferraldiagnosticandtreatmentintervalsonthelungcancercarepathwayprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rubingreg socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientprimarycarereferraldiagnosticandtreatmentintervalsonthelungcancercarepathwayprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT whitemartin socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientprimarycarereferraldiagnosticandtreatmentintervalsonthelungcancercarepathwayprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT adamsjean socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientprimarycarereferraldiagnosticandtreatmentintervalsonthelungcancercarepathwayprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis