Cargando…

Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future

Objective: To review the current knowledge and implementation of preconceptional care (PCC) in the Western world, focusing both on health care workers and the general population, and to analyze pathways to disseminate the influence of preconceptional care on pregnancy outcome. Methods: A systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braspenningx, S., Haagdorens, M., Blaumeiser, B., Jacquemyn, Y., Mortier, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753925
_version_ 1782479658361552896
author Braspenningx, S.
Haagdorens, M.
Blaumeiser, B.
Jacquemyn, Y.
Mortier, G.
author_facet Braspenningx, S.
Haagdorens, M.
Blaumeiser, B.
Jacquemyn, Y.
Mortier, G.
author_sort Braspenningx, S.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To review the current knowledge and implementation of preconceptional care (PCC) in the Western world, focusing both on health care workers and the general population, and to analyze pathways to disseminate the influence of preconceptional care on pregnancy outcome. Methods: A systematic literature study was performed using OvidSP and Pubmed, searching for articles about PCC and its implementation, published between 1966 and October 2012. Only randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews dealing with PCC in the Western world were retained. Results: Forty-six articles were identified for review. PCC might result in better pregnancy outcomes, including e.g. a reduction of congenital abnormalities. There are no proven disadvantages of PCC. Health care workers are in favor of the implementation of PCC, but claim that they don’t have enough knowledge to do so. The general population shows interest in receiving PCC. The implementation of PCC should be improved by e.g. the development of guidelines and checklists. Conclusions: As PCC might improve pregnancy outcomes and is considered important by health care workers and the general population, its implementation should be improved, e.g. by the development of guidelines and checklists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3987351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39873512014-04-21 Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future Braspenningx, S. Haagdorens, M. Blaumeiser, B. Jacquemyn, Y. Mortier, G. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Systematic Review Objective: To review the current knowledge and implementation of preconceptional care (PCC) in the Western world, focusing both on health care workers and the general population, and to analyze pathways to disseminate the influence of preconceptional care on pregnancy outcome. Methods: A systematic literature study was performed using OvidSP and Pubmed, searching for articles about PCC and its implementation, published between 1966 and October 2012. Only randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews dealing with PCC in the Western world were retained. Results: Forty-six articles were identified for review. PCC might result in better pregnancy outcomes, including e.g. a reduction of congenital abnormalities. There are no proven disadvantages of PCC. Health care workers are in favor of the implementation of PCC, but claim that they don’t have enough knowledge to do so. The general population shows interest in receiving PCC. The implementation of PCC should be improved by e.g. the development of guidelines and checklists. Conclusions: As PCC might improve pregnancy outcomes and is considered important by health care workers and the general population, its implementation should be improved, e.g. by the development of guidelines and checklists. Universa Press 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3987351/ /pubmed/24753925 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Braspenningx, S.
Haagdorens, M.
Blaumeiser, B.
Jacquemyn, Y.
Mortier, G.
Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future
title Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future
title_full Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future
title_fullStr Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future
title_full_unstemmed Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future
title_short Preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future
title_sort preconceptional care: a systematic review of the current situation and recommendations for the future
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753925
work_keys_str_mv AT braspenningxs preconceptionalcareasystematicreviewofthecurrentsituationandrecommendationsforthefuture
AT haagdorensm preconceptionalcareasystematicreviewofthecurrentsituationandrecommendationsforthefuture
AT blaumeiserb preconceptionalcareasystematicreviewofthecurrentsituationandrecommendationsforthefuture
AT jacquemyny preconceptionalcareasystematicreviewofthecurrentsituationandrecommendationsforthefuture
AT mortierg preconceptionalcareasystematicreviewofthecurrentsituationandrecommendationsforthefuture