Cargando…
Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) was introduced in 1996 to improve the methodological quality of published reports of randomised controlled trials. By doing a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on reproductive surgery, our group can demonstrate that the overall...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universa Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753872 |
_version_ | 1782479684390354944 |
---|---|
author | Bosteels, J. Weyers, S. Siristatidis, C. Bhattacharya, S. D’Hooghe, T. |
author_facet | Bosteels, J. Weyers, S. Siristatidis, C. Bhattacharya, S. D’Hooghe, T. |
author_sort | Bosteels, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) was introduced in 1996 to improve the methodological quality of published reports of randomised controlled trials. By doing a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on reproductive surgery, our group can demonstrate that the overall quality of the published reports of randomised studies on reproductive surgical interventions has improved after CONSORT. Nevertheless, some problems still remain. By discussing the benefits and pitfalls of randomised trials in reproductive surgery, our opinion paper aims to stimulate the reader’s further interest in evidence-based practice in reproductive surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3987467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Universa Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39874672014-04-21 Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery Bosteels, J. Weyers, S. Siristatidis, C. Bhattacharya, S. D’Hooghe, T. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Opinion Paper The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) was introduced in 1996 to improve the methodological quality of published reports of randomised controlled trials. By doing a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on reproductive surgery, our group can demonstrate that the overall quality of the published reports of randomised studies on reproductive surgical interventions has improved after CONSORT. Nevertheless, some problems still remain. By discussing the benefits and pitfalls of randomised trials in reproductive surgery, our opinion paper aims to stimulate the reader’s further interest in evidence-based practice in reproductive surgery. Universa Press 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3987467/ /pubmed/24753872 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Paper Bosteels, J. Weyers, S. Siristatidis, C. Bhattacharya, S. D’Hooghe, T. Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
title | Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
title_full | Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
title_fullStr | Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
title_short | Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
title_sort | progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
topic | Opinion Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosteelsj progressinevidencebasedreproductivesurgery AT weyerss progressinevidencebasedreproductivesurgery AT siristatidisc progressinevidencebasedreproductivesurgery AT bhattacharyas progressinevidencebasedreproductivesurgery AT dhooghet progressinevidencebasedreproductivesurgery |