Cargando…

The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF) has been shown to accurately predict significant liver fibrosis in several liver diseases. AIMS: To perform a meta-analysis to assess the performance of the ELF test for the assessment of liver fibrosis. STUDY: Electronic and manual searches were pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Qingsong, Zhou, Xiaohu, Huang, Pengfei, Wei, Jianfeng, Wang, Weilin, Zheng, Shusen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092772
_version_ 1782311962116358144
author Xie, Qingsong
Zhou, Xiaohu
Huang, Pengfei
Wei, Jianfeng
Wang, Weilin
Zheng, Shusen
author_facet Xie, Qingsong
Zhou, Xiaohu
Huang, Pengfei
Wei, Jianfeng
Wang, Weilin
Zheng, Shusen
author_sort Xie, Qingsong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF) has been shown to accurately predict significant liver fibrosis in several liver diseases. AIMS: To perform a meta-analysis to assess the performance of the ELF test for the assessment of liver fibrosis. STUDY: Electronic and manual searches were performed to identify studies of the ELF test. After methodological quality assessment and data extraction, pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) were assessed systematically. The extent of heterogeneity and reasons for it were assessed. RESULTS: Nine studies were identified for analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, negative LR, and DOR values of ELF test, for assessment of significant liver fibrosis, were 83% (95% CI = 0.80–0.86), 73% (95% CI = 0.69–0.77), 4.00 (95% CI = 2.50–6.39), 0.24 (95% CI = 0.17–0.34), and 16.10 (95% CI = 8.27–31.34), respectively; and, for evaluation of severe liver fibrosis, were 78% (95% CI = 0.74–0.81), 76% (95% CI = 0.73–0.78), 4.39 (95% CI = 2.76–6.97), 0.27 (95% CI = 0.16–0.46), and 16.01 (95% CI: 7.15–35.82), respectively; and, for estimation of cirrhosis, were 80% (95% CI = 0.75–0.85), 71% (95% CI = 0.68–0.74), 3.13 (95% CI = 2.01–4.87), 0.29 (95% CI = 0.19–0.44), and 14.09 (95% CI: 5.43–36.59), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ELF test shows good performance and considerable diagnostic value for the prediction of histological fibrosis stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3988013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39880132014-04-21 The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis Xie, Qingsong Zhou, Xiaohu Huang, Pengfei Wei, Jianfeng Wang, Weilin Zheng, Shusen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF) has been shown to accurately predict significant liver fibrosis in several liver diseases. AIMS: To perform a meta-analysis to assess the performance of the ELF test for the assessment of liver fibrosis. STUDY: Electronic and manual searches were performed to identify studies of the ELF test. After methodological quality assessment and data extraction, pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) were assessed systematically. The extent of heterogeneity and reasons for it were assessed. RESULTS: Nine studies were identified for analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, negative LR, and DOR values of ELF test, for assessment of significant liver fibrosis, were 83% (95% CI = 0.80–0.86), 73% (95% CI = 0.69–0.77), 4.00 (95% CI = 2.50–6.39), 0.24 (95% CI = 0.17–0.34), and 16.10 (95% CI = 8.27–31.34), respectively; and, for evaluation of severe liver fibrosis, were 78% (95% CI = 0.74–0.81), 76% (95% CI = 0.73–0.78), 4.39 (95% CI = 2.76–6.97), 0.27 (95% CI = 0.16–0.46), and 16.01 (95% CI: 7.15–35.82), respectively; and, for estimation of cirrhosis, were 80% (95% CI = 0.75–0.85), 71% (95% CI = 0.68–0.74), 3.13 (95% CI = 2.01–4.87), 0.29 (95% CI = 0.19–0.44), and 14.09 (95% CI: 5.43–36.59), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ELF test shows good performance and considerable diagnostic value for the prediction of histological fibrosis stage. Public Library of Science 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3988013/ /pubmed/24736610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092772 Text en © 2014 Xie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xie, Qingsong
Zhou, Xiaohu
Huang, Pengfei
Wei, Jianfeng
Wang, Weilin
Zheng, Shusen
The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis
title The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_short The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort performance of enhanced liver fibrosis (elf) test for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092772
work_keys_str_mv AT xieqingsong theperformanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT zhouxiaohu theperformanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT huangpengfei theperformanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT weijianfeng theperformanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT wangweilin theperformanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT zhengshusen theperformanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT xieqingsong performanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT zhouxiaohu performanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT huangpengfei performanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT weijianfeng performanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT wangweilin performanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis
AT zhengshusen performanceofenhancedliverfibrosiselftestforthestagingofliverfibrosisametaanalysis