Cargando…

Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Configuring high quality care for the rapidly increasing number of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major challenge worldwide for both providers and commissioners. In the UK, about two thirds of people with T2D are managed entirely in primary care, with wide variation in management...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Andrew, O’Hare, Joseph Paul, Hardy, Ainsley, Raymond, Neil, Szczepura, Ala, Crossman, Ric, Baines, Darrin, Khunti, Kamlesh, Kumar, Sudhesh, Saravanan, Ponnusamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093964
_version_ 1782311965073342464
author Wilson, Andrew
O’Hare, Joseph Paul
Hardy, Ainsley
Raymond, Neil
Szczepura, Ala
Crossman, Ric
Baines, Darrin
Khunti, Kamlesh
Kumar, Sudhesh
Saravanan, Ponnusamy
author_facet Wilson, Andrew
O’Hare, Joseph Paul
Hardy, Ainsley
Raymond, Neil
Szczepura, Ala
Crossman, Ric
Baines, Darrin
Khunti, Kamlesh
Kumar, Sudhesh
Saravanan, Ponnusamy
author_sort Wilson, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Configuring high quality care for the rapidly increasing number of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major challenge worldwide for both providers and commissioners. In the UK, about two thirds of people with T2D are managed entirely in primary care, with wide variation in management strategies and achievement of targets. Pay for performance, introduced in 2004, initially resulted in improvements but disparities exist in ethnic minorities and the improvements are levelling off. Community based, intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCDs) were considered one solution and are functioning across the UK. However, there is no randomised trial evidence for the effectiveness of such clinics. TRIAL DESIGN, METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a cluster-randomised trial, involving 3 primary care trusts, with 49 general practices randomised to usual care (n = 25) or intervention (ICCDs; n = 24). All eligible adult patients with T2D were invited; 1997 were recruited and 1280 followed-up after 18-months intervention. Primary outcome: achievement of all three of the NICE targets [(HbA1c≤7.0%/53 mmol/mol; Blood Pressure <140/80 mmHg; cholesterol <154 mg/dl (4 mmol/l)]. Primary outcome was achieved in 14.3% in the intervention arm vs. 9.3% in the control arm (p = 0.059 after adjustment for covariates). The odds ratio (95% CI) for achieving primary outcome in the intervention group was 1.56 (0.98, 2.49). Primary care and community clinic costs were significantly higher in the intervention group, but there were no significant differences in hospital costs or overall healthcare costs. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of +£7,778 per QALY gained, indicated ICCD was marginally more expensive at producing health gain. CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate care clinics can contribute to improving target achievement in patients with diabetes. Further work is needed to investigate the optimal scale and organisational structure of ICCD services and whether, over time, their role may change as skill levels in primary care increase. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00945204; National Research Register (NRR) M0014178167.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3988031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39880312014-04-21 Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Wilson, Andrew O’Hare, Joseph Paul Hardy, Ainsley Raymond, Neil Szczepura, Ala Crossman, Ric Baines, Darrin Khunti, Kamlesh Kumar, Sudhesh Saravanan, Ponnusamy PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Configuring high quality care for the rapidly increasing number of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major challenge worldwide for both providers and commissioners. In the UK, about two thirds of people with T2D are managed entirely in primary care, with wide variation in management strategies and achievement of targets. Pay for performance, introduced in 2004, initially resulted in improvements but disparities exist in ethnic minorities and the improvements are levelling off. Community based, intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCDs) were considered one solution and are functioning across the UK. However, there is no randomised trial evidence for the effectiveness of such clinics. TRIAL DESIGN, METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a cluster-randomised trial, involving 3 primary care trusts, with 49 general practices randomised to usual care (n = 25) or intervention (ICCDs; n = 24). All eligible adult patients with T2D were invited; 1997 were recruited and 1280 followed-up after 18-months intervention. Primary outcome: achievement of all three of the NICE targets [(HbA1c≤7.0%/53 mmol/mol; Blood Pressure <140/80 mmHg; cholesterol <154 mg/dl (4 mmol/l)]. Primary outcome was achieved in 14.3% in the intervention arm vs. 9.3% in the control arm (p = 0.059 after adjustment for covariates). The odds ratio (95% CI) for achieving primary outcome in the intervention group was 1.56 (0.98, 2.49). Primary care and community clinic costs were significantly higher in the intervention group, but there were no significant differences in hospital costs or overall healthcare costs. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of +£7,778 per QALY gained, indicated ICCD was marginally more expensive at producing health gain. CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate care clinics can contribute to improving target achievement in patients with diabetes. Further work is needed to investigate the optimal scale and organisational structure of ICCD services and whether, over time, their role may change as skill levels in primary care increase. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00945204; National Research Register (NRR) M0014178167. Public Library of Science 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3988031/ /pubmed/24736243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093964 Text en © 2014 Wilson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson, Andrew
O’Hare, Joseph Paul
Hardy, Ainsley
Raymond, Neil
Szczepura, Ala
Crossman, Ric
Baines, Darrin
Khunti, Kamlesh
Kumar, Sudhesh
Saravanan, Ponnusamy
Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Intermediate Care Clinics for Diabetes (ICCD): A Multicentre Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (iccd): a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093964
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonandrew evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oharejosephpaul evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hardyainsley evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT raymondneil evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT szczepuraala evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT crossmanric evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bainesdarrin evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT khuntikamlesh evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kumarsudhesh evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT saravananponnusamy evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT evaluationoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofintermediatecareclinicsfordiabetesiccdamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial