Cargando…
Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China
Shigellosis is a major public health concern in China, where waterborne disease outbreaks are common. Shigellosis-containing strategies, mostly single or multiple interventions, are implemented by primary-level health departments. Systematic assessment of the effectiveness of these measures is scarc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095006 |
_version_ | 1782311982951563264 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Tianmu Leung, Ross Ka-kit Zhou, Zi Liu, Ruchun Zhang, Xixing Zhang, Lijie |
author_facet | Chen, Tianmu Leung, Ross Ka-kit Zhou, Zi Liu, Ruchun Zhang, Xixing Zhang, Lijie |
author_sort | Chen, Tianmu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Shigellosis is a major public health concern in China, where waterborne disease outbreaks are common. Shigellosis-containing strategies, mostly single or multiple interventions, are implemented by primary-level health departments. Systematic assessment of the effectiveness of these measures is scarce. To estimate the efficacy of commonly used intervention strategies, we developed a Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious/Asymptomatic–Recovered–Water model. No intervention was predicted to result in a total attack rate (TAR) of 90% of the affected population (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.65–92.80) and duration of outbreak (DO) of 89 days, and the use of single-intervention strategies can be futile or even counter-productive. Prophylactics and water disinfection did not improve TAR or DO. School closure for up to 3 weeks did not help but only increased DO. Isolation alone significantly increased DO. Only antibiotics treatment could shorten the DO to 35 days with TAR unaffected. We observed that these intervention effects were additive when in combined usage under most circumstances. Combined intervention “Isolation+antibiotics+prophylactics+water disinfection” was predicted to result in the lowest TAR (41.9%, 95%CI: 36.97–47.04%) and shortest DO (28 days). Our actual Shigellosis control implementation that also included school closure for 1 week, attained comparable results and the modeling produced an epidemic curve of Shigellosis highly similar to our actual outbreak data. This lends a strong support to the reality of our model that provides a possible reference for public health professionals to evaluate their strategies towards Shigellosis control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3988114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39881142014-04-21 Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China Chen, Tianmu Leung, Ross Ka-kit Zhou, Zi Liu, Ruchun Zhang, Xixing Zhang, Lijie PLoS One Research Article Shigellosis is a major public health concern in China, where waterborne disease outbreaks are common. Shigellosis-containing strategies, mostly single or multiple interventions, are implemented by primary-level health departments. Systematic assessment of the effectiveness of these measures is scarce. To estimate the efficacy of commonly used intervention strategies, we developed a Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious/Asymptomatic–Recovered–Water model. No intervention was predicted to result in a total attack rate (TAR) of 90% of the affected population (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.65–92.80) and duration of outbreak (DO) of 89 days, and the use of single-intervention strategies can be futile or even counter-productive. Prophylactics and water disinfection did not improve TAR or DO. School closure for up to 3 weeks did not help but only increased DO. Isolation alone significantly increased DO. Only antibiotics treatment could shorten the DO to 35 days with TAR unaffected. We observed that these intervention effects were additive when in combined usage under most circumstances. Combined intervention “Isolation+antibiotics+prophylactics+water disinfection” was predicted to result in the lowest TAR (41.9%, 95%CI: 36.97–47.04%) and shortest DO (28 days). Our actual Shigellosis control implementation that also included school closure for 1 week, attained comparable results and the modeling produced an epidemic curve of Shigellosis highly similar to our actual outbreak data. This lends a strong support to the reality of our model that provides a possible reference for public health professionals to evaluate their strategies towards Shigellosis control. Public Library of Science 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3988114/ /pubmed/24736407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095006 Text en © 2014 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Tianmu Leung, Ross Ka-kit Zhou, Zi Liu, Ruchun Zhang, Xixing Zhang, Lijie Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China |
title | Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China |
title_full | Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China |
title_fullStr | Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China |
title_short | Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China |
title_sort | investigation of key interventions for shigellosis outbreak control in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chentianmu investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina AT leungrosskakit investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina AT zhouzi investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina AT liuruchun investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina AT zhangxixing investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina AT zhanglijie investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina |