Cargando…

Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China

Shigellosis is a major public health concern in China, where waterborne disease outbreaks are common. Shigellosis-containing strategies, mostly single or multiple interventions, are implemented by primary-level health departments. Systematic assessment of the effectiveness of these measures is scarc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Tianmu, Leung, Ross Ka-kit, Zhou, Zi, Liu, Ruchun, Zhang, Xixing, Zhang, Lijie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095006
_version_ 1782311982951563264
author Chen, Tianmu
Leung, Ross Ka-kit
Zhou, Zi
Liu, Ruchun
Zhang, Xixing
Zhang, Lijie
author_facet Chen, Tianmu
Leung, Ross Ka-kit
Zhou, Zi
Liu, Ruchun
Zhang, Xixing
Zhang, Lijie
author_sort Chen, Tianmu
collection PubMed
description Shigellosis is a major public health concern in China, where waterborne disease outbreaks are common. Shigellosis-containing strategies, mostly single or multiple interventions, are implemented by primary-level health departments. Systematic assessment of the effectiveness of these measures is scarce. To estimate the efficacy of commonly used intervention strategies, we developed a Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious/Asymptomatic–Recovered–Water model. No intervention was predicted to result in a total attack rate (TAR) of 90% of the affected population (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.65–92.80) and duration of outbreak (DO) of 89 days, and the use of single-intervention strategies can be futile or even counter-productive. Prophylactics and water disinfection did not improve TAR or DO. School closure for up to 3 weeks did not help but only increased DO. Isolation alone significantly increased DO. Only antibiotics treatment could shorten the DO to 35 days with TAR unaffected. We observed that these intervention effects were additive when in combined usage under most circumstances. Combined intervention “Isolation+antibiotics+prophylactics+water disinfection” was predicted to result in the lowest TAR (41.9%, 95%CI: 36.97–47.04%) and shortest DO (28 days). Our actual Shigellosis control implementation that also included school closure for 1 week, attained comparable results and the modeling produced an epidemic curve of Shigellosis highly similar to our actual outbreak data. This lends a strong support to the reality of our model that provides a possible reference for public health professionals to evaluate their strategies towards Shigellosis control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3988114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39881142014-04-21 Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China Chen, Tianmu Leung, Ross Ka-kit Zhou, Zi Liu, Ruchun Zhang, Xixing Zhang, Lijie PLoS One Research Article Shigellosis is a major public health concern in China, where waterborne disease outbreaks are common. Shigellosis-containing strategies, mostly single or multiple interventions, are implemented by primary-level health departments. Systematic assessment of the effectiveness of these measures is scarce. To estimate the efficacy of commonly used intervention strategies, we developed a Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious/Asymptomatic–Recovered–Water model. No intervention was predicted to result in a total attack rate (TAR) of 90% of the affected population (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.65–92.80) and duration of outbreak (DO) of 89 days, and the use of single-intervention strategies can be futile or even counter-productive. Prophylactics and water disinfection did not improve TAR or DO. School closure for up to 3 weeks did not help but only increased DO. Isolation alone significantly increased DO. Only antibiotics treatment could shorten the DO to 35 days with TAR unaffected. We observed that these intervention effects were additive when in combined usage under most circumstances. Combined intervention “Isolation+antibiotics+prophylactics+water disinfection” was predicted to result in the lowest TAR (41.9%, 95%CI: 36.97–47.04%) and shortest DO (28 days). Our actual Shigellosis control implementation that also included school closure for 1 week, attained comparable results and the modeling produced an epidemic curve of Shigellosis highly similar to our actual outbreak data. This lends a strong support to the reality of our model that provides a possible reference for public health professionals to evaluate their strategies towards Shigellosis control. Public Library of Science 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3988114/ /pubmed/24736407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095006 Text en © 2014 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Tianmu
Leung, Ross Ka-kit
Zhou, Zi
Liu, Ruchun
Zhang, Xixing
Zhang, Lijie
Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China
title Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China
title_full Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China
title_fullStr Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China
title_short Investigation of Key Interventions for Shigellosis Outbreak Control in China
title_sort investigation of key interventions for shigellosis outbreak control in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095006
work_keys_str_mv AT chentianmu investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina
AT leungrosskakit investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina
AT zhouzi investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina
AT liuruchun investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina
AT zhangxixing investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina
AT zhanglijie investigationofkeyinterventionsforshigellosisoutbreakcontrolinchina