Cargando…

Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly

Royal jelly has been demonstrated to have several physiological activities. However, in the literature, different reactions induced by royal jelly are reported. We describe a case of seven-year-old child that was referred to our observation for two episodes of oral allergy syndrome (OAS) that appear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paola, Fantini, Pantalea, Delle Donne, Gianfranco, Calogiuri, Antonio, Ferrannini, Angelo, Vacca, Eustachio, Nettis, Elisabetta, Di Leo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24799914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/941248
_version_ 1782312059342422016
author Paola, Fantini
Pantalea, Delle Donne
Gianfranco, Calogiuri
Antonio, Ferrannini
Angelo, Vacca
Eustachio, Nettis
Elisabetta, Di Leo
author_facet Paola, Fantini
Pantalea, Delle Donne
Gianfranco, Calogiuri
Antonio, Ferrannini
Angelo, Vacca
Eustachio, Nettis
Elisabetta, Di Leo
author_sort Paola, Fantini
collection PubMed
description Royal jelly has been demonstrated to have several physiological activities. However, in the literature, different reactions induced by royal jelly are reported. We describe a case of seven-year-old child that was referred to our observation for two episodes of oral allergy syndrome (OAS) that appeared ten minutes after ingestion of royal jelly. Skin prick test with standard panel of inhalant and food allergens, a prick-to-prick test using the royal jelly's extract responsible for patient's reactions, and royal jelly patch test with extemporaneous preparation were performed. The specific IgE by ImmunoCAP System method versus Hymenoptera venom, inhalant allergens, food allergens, and lipid transfer proteins was dosed. According to the positive reactions to royal jelly both by prick-by-prick test and by a first reading patch test, royal jelly immediate hypersensitivity was diagnosed. According to the positive response for almond in both in vivo and in vitro tests we can think of the royal jelly contamination with almond pollen as possible cause of patient's reaction. Moreover, from the results of specific IgE titers versus Compositae pollens, we have argued the possibility that this case of royal jelly allergy could be explained also by the mechanism of cross-reaction with Compositae pollens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3988729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39887292014-05-05 Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly Paola, Fantini Pantalea, Delle Donne Gianfranco, Calogiuri Antonio, Ferrannini Angelo, Vacca Eustachio, Nettis Elisabetta, Di Leo Case Rep Med Case Report Royal jelly has been demonstrated to have several physiological activities. However, in the literature, different reactions induced by royal jelly are reported. We describe a case of seven-year-old child that was referred to our observation for two episodes of oral allergy syndrome (OAS) that appeared ten minutes after ingestion of royal jelly. Skin prick test with standard panel of inhalant and food allergens, a prick-to-prick test using the royal jelly's extract responsible for patient's reactions, and royal jelly patch test with extemporaneous preparation were performed. The specific IgE by ImmunoCAP System method versus Hymenoptera venom, inhalant allergens, food allergens, and lipid transfer proteins was dosed. According to the positive reactions to royal jelly both by prick-by-prick test and by a first reading patch test, royal jelly immediate hypersensitivity was diagnosed. According to the positive response for almond in both in vivo and in vitro tests we can think of the royal jelly contamination with almond pollen as possible cause of patient's reaction. Moreover, from the results of specific IgE titers versus Compositae pollens, we have argued the possibility that this case of royal jelly allergy could be explained also by the mechanism of cross-reaction with Compositae pollens. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3988729/ /pubmed/24799914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/941248 Text en Copyright © 2014 Fantini Paola et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Paola, Fantini
Pantalea, Delle Donne
Gianfranco, Calogiuri
Antonio, Ferrannini
Angelo, Vacca
Eustachio, Nettis
Elisabetta, Di Leo
Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly
title Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly
title_full Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly
title_fullStr Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly
title_full_unstemmed Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly
title_short Oral Allergy Syndrome in a Child Provoked by Royal Jelly
title_sort oral allergy syndrome in a child provoked by royal jelly
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24799914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/941248
work_keys_str_mv AT paolafantini oralallergysyndromeinachildprovokedbyroyaljelly
AT pantaleadelledonne oralallergysyndromeinachildprovokedbyroyaljelly
AT gianfrancocalogiuri oralallergysyndromeinachildprovokedbyroyaljelly
AT antonioferrannini oralallergysyndromeinachildprovokedbyroyaljelly
AT angelovacca oralallergysyndromeinachildprovokedbyroyaljelly
AT eustachionettis oralallergysyndromeinachildprovokedbyroyaljelly
AT elisabettadileo oralallergysyndromeinachildprovokedbyroyaljelly